Fracture of geometric bone models. Multiscale simulation issues

References

• Andreaus U, Colloca M. 2009. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 223(5):589–605. doi:10.1243/09544119jeim559.
   Google Scholar
• Andreaus U, Colloca M, Iacoviello D. 2011. Coupling image processing and stress analysis for damage identification in a human premolar tooth. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 103(2):61–73. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• Burr DB, Forwood MR, Fyhrie DP, Martin RB, Schaffler MB, Turner CH. 1997. Bone microdamage and skeletal fragility in osteoporotic and stress fractures. J Bone Min Res. 12(1):6–15. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Egol KA, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. 2010. Handbook of fractures. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Glondu L, Muguercia L, Marchal M, Bosch C, Rushmeier H, Dumont G, Drettakis G. 2012. Example-based fractured appearance. Comput Graph Forum. 31(4):1547–1556. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03151.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gobron S, Chiba N. 2001. Crack pattern simulation based on 3d surface cellular automata. Vis Comput. 17(5):287–309. doi:10.1007/s003710100099.
   Google Scholar
• Hambli R, Bettamer A, Allaoui S. 2012. Finite element prediction of proximal femur fracture pattern based on orthotropic behaviour law coupled to quasi-brittle damage. Med Eng Phys. 34(2):202–210. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.011.
   Google Scholar
• Kazhdan M, Hoppe H. 2013. Screened poisson surface reconstruction. ACM Trans Graph. 32(3):1–13. doi:10.1145/2487228.2487237.
   Google Scholar
• Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA, Berger M. 2010. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: A summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Min Res. 15(4):721–739. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.721.
   Google Scholar
• Muguercia L, Bosch C, Patow G. 2014. Fracture modeling in computer graphics. Comput Graph. 45:86–100. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2014.08.006.
   Google Scholar
• Müller M, Chentanez N, Kim TY. 2013. Real time dynamic fracture with volumetric approximate convex decompositions. ACM Trans Graph. 32(4):1. doi:10.1145/2461912.2461934.
   Google Scholar
• NVI. 2019. Nvidia gameworks; [accessed 2019 Jan 20]. https://developer.nvidia.com/what-is-gameworks.
   Google Scholar
• Oh S, Shin S, Jun H. 2012. Practical simulation of hierarchical brittle fracture. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds. 23(3–4):291–300. doi:10.1002/cav.1443.
   Google Scholar
• Pacevič R, Kačeniauskas A, Markauskas D. 2015. Visualization of cracks by using the local voronoi decompositions and distributed software. Adv Eng Softw. 84:85–94. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Paulano F, Jiménez JJ, Pulido R. 2014. 3d segmentation and labeling of fractured bone from CT images. Vis Comput. 30(6–8):939–948. doi:10.1007/s00371-014-0963-0.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cano FD, Jiménez-Delgado JJ 2019. Towards the modelling of osseous tissue. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (GRAPP 2019); Febrero 25–27; Praga (República Checa). p. 340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cano FD, Jiménez-Delgado JJ, Jiménez-Pérez JR 2018. Blast features and requirements for fracturing osseous models. In: Congreso Español de Informática Gráfica 2018 (CEIG); Junio 27–29; Madrid (España).
   Google Scholar
• Sabet FA, Najafi AR, Hamed E, Jasiuk I. 2016. Modelling of bone fracture and strength at different length scales: a review. Interf Focus. 6(1):20150055. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2015.0055.
   Google Scholar
• Standring S, editor. 2008. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Ural A. 2011. Cohesive modeling of bone fracture at multiple scales. Proc Eng. 10:2827–2832. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.470.
   Google Scholar