Principal component-based image segmentation: a new approach to outline in vitro cell colonies

References

• Abdi H, Williams LJ. 2010. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2(4):433–459. doi:10.1002/wics.101.
   Google Scholar
• Akram SU, Kannala J, Eklund L, and Heikkilä J. 2016. Cell segmentation proposal network for microscopy image analysis. In: Deep learning and data labeling for medical applications. New York (NY): Springer; p. 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Albaradei SA, Napolitano F, Uludag M, Thafar M, Napolitano S, Essack M, Bajic VB, Gao X. 2020. Automated counting of colony forming units using deep transfer learning from a model for congested scenes analysis. IEEE Access. 8:164340–164346. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021656.
   Google Scholar
• Arous D, Schrunner S, Hanson I, FJ Edin N, and Malinen E. 2021. Cell colony image segmentation dataset 1 for T-47D breast cancer cells. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4593510.
   Google Scholar
• Bewes J, Suchowerska N, McKenzie D. 2008. Automated cell colony counting and analysis using the circular Hough image transform algorithm (chita). Phys Med Biol. 53(21):5991. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/21/007.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Google Scholar
• Cai Z, Chattopadhyay N, Liu WJ, Chan C, Pignol JP, Reilly RM. 2011. Optimized digital counting colonies of clonogenic assays using ImageJ software and customized macros: comparison with manual counting. Int J Radiat Biol. 87(11):1135–1146. doi:10.3109/09553002.2011.622033.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, Clarke C, Kang IH, Friman O, Guertin DA, Chang JH, Lindquist RA, Moffat J, et al. 2006. Cellprofiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7(10):R100. doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang PJ, Tseng MJ, He ZS, Li CH. 2015. Automated counting of bacterial colonies by image analysis. J Microbiol Methods. 108:74–82. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2014.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhry P. 2016. High-throughput method for automated colony and cell counting by digital image analysis based on edge detection. PloS one. 11(2):e0148469. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148469.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke ML, Burton RL, Hill AN, Litorja M, Nahm MH, Hwang J. 2010. Low-cost, high-throughput, automated counting of bacterial colonies. Cytometry Part A. 77A(8):790–797. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20864.
   Google Scholar
• Edin NJ, Olsen DR, Sandvik JA, Malinen E, Pettersen EO. 2012. Low dose hyper-radiosensitivity is eliminated during exposure to cycling hypoxia but returns after reoxygenation. Int J Radiat Biol. 88(4):311–319. doi:10.3109/09553002.2012.646046.
   Google Scholar
• Falk T, Mai D, Bensch R, Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Marrakchi Y, Böhm A, Deubner J, Jäckel Z, Seiwald K, et al. 2019. U-net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat Methods. 16(1):67–70. doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0261-2.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari A, Lombardi S, Signoroni A. 2017. Bacterial colony counting with convolutional neural networks in digital microbiology imaging. Pattern Recognit. 61:629–640. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.07.016.
   Google Scholar
• Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, Van Bree C. 2006. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 1(5):2315. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.339.
   Google Scholar
• Geissmann Q. 2013. Opencfu, a new free and open-source software to count cell colonies and other circular objects. PloS one. 8(2):e54072. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054072.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. 2018. Digital image processing. New York (NY): Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 6(6):610–621. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314.
   Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, and Shapiro LG. 1992. Computer and robot vision. Vol. 1. Boston (MA): Addison-wesley Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Junkin M, Tay S. 2014. Microfluidic single-cell analysis for systems immunology. Lab Chip. 14(7):1246–1260. doi:10.1039/c3lc51182k.
   Google Scholar
• Khan AUM, Mikut R, Reischl M. 2016. A new feedback-based method for parameter adaptation in image processing routines. PloS one. 11(10):e0165180. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165180.
   Google Scholar
• Khan A.u.M, Torelli A, and Wolf I, et al. 2018. AutoCellSeg: robust automatic colony forming unit (CFU)/cell analysis using adaptive image segmentation and easy-to-use post-editing techniques. Sci Rep. 8(1):1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17765-5.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev DB, Slabicki M, Paszkowski-Rogacz M, Hubner NC, Junqueira M, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Neugebauer KM, Buchholz F. 2011. A systematic RNAi synthetic interaction screen reveals a link between p53 and snornp assembly. Nat Cell Biol. 13(7):809–818. doi:10.1038/ncb2264.
   Google Scholar
• Lay DC, Lay SR, McDonald J. 2020. Linear algebra and its applications. Boston (MA): Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd S. 1982. Least squares quantization in pcm. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 28(2):129–137. doi:10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489.
   Google Scholar
• Mansberg H. 1957. Automatic particle and bacterial colony counter. Science. 126(3278):823–827. doi:10.1126/science.126.3278.823.
   Google Scholar
• Militello C, Rundo L, Conti V, Minafra L, Cammarata FP, Mauri G, Gilardi MC, Porcino N. 2017. Area-based cell colony surviving fraction evaluation: a novel fully automatic approach using general-purpose acquisition hardware. Comput Biol Med. 89:454–465. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Militello C, Rundo L, Minafra L, Cammarata FP, Calvaruso M, Conti V, Russo G. 2020. Mf2c3: multi-feature fuzzy clustering to enhance cell colony detection in automated clonogenic assay evaluation. Symmetry. 12(5):773. doi:10.3390/sym12050773.
   Google Scholar
• Moiseenko V, Duzenli C, Durand RE. 2007. In vitro study of cell survival following dynamic MLC intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose delivery. Med Phys. 34(4):1514–1520. doi:10.1118/1.2712044.
   Google Scholar
• Otsu N. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 9(1):62–66. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076.
   Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, and Brox T 2015. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, 2015 Munich, Germany. Springer. p. 234–241 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.
   Google Scholar
• Sadanandan SK, Ranefall P, Le Guyader S, Wählby C. 2017. Automated training of deep convolutional neural networks for cell segmentation. Sci Rep. 7(1):1–7. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07599-6.
   Google Scholar
• Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 9(7):676–682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sergioli G, Militello C, Rundo L, Minafra L, Torrisi F, Russo G, Chow KL, Giuntini R. 2021. A quantum-inspired classifier for clonogenic assay evaluations. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82085-8.
   Google Scholar
• Siragusa M, Dall’Olio S, Fredericia PM, Jensen M, Groesser T. 2018. Cell colony counter called coconut. PloS one. 13(11):e0205823. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205823.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer C, Straehle C, Koethe U, and Hamprecht FA 2011. Ilastik: interactive learning and segmentation toolkit. In: 2011 IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: From nano to macro, 2011 Chicago (IL). IEEE. p. 230–233 doi:10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872394.
   Google Scholar
• Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2(1–3):37–52. doi:10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9.
   Google Scholar
• Xie W, Noble JA, Zisserman A. 2018. Microscopy cell counting and detection with fully convolutional regression networks. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & Visualization. 6(3):283–292.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderveld K. 1994. Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. Graphics Gems. 474–485.
   Google Scholar