Severity and Cobb angle of scoliosis patients quantified with markerless trunk surface topography using k-NN search and multivariate regression analysis

References

• Applebaum A, Ference R, Cho W. 2020. Evaluating the role of surface topography in the surveillance of scoliosis. Spine Deform. 8(3):397–404. eng. Epub 2020 Jan 21. 10.1007/s43390-019-00001-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Betsch M, Wild M, Rath B, Tingart M, Schulze A, Quack V. 2015. Strahlenfreie Diagnostik bei Skoliosen: Ein Überblick über die Oberflächen- und Wirbelsäulentopographie [Radiation-free diagnosis of scoliosis: An overview of the surface and spine topography]. Orthopäde. 44(11):845–851. ger. doi:10.1007/s00132-015-3175-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cimić M, Kovac V, Smiljanić I, Kovac I, Cimić A, Smoljanović T. 2009. Relationship between clinical contourometric measurements and vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Coll Antropol. 33 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):127–133. eng.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cobb RJ. 1948. Outline for the study of scoliosis, instructional course lectures. J Bone Jt Surg. 5:261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE. 2000. Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25(16):2052–2063. eng. doi:10.1097/00007632-200008150-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass MJJ. 2022. Can optical scanning technologies replace CT for 3D printed medical devices in radiation oncology? J Med Radiat Sci. 69(2):139–142. eng. Epub 2022 Apr 2. 10.1002/jmrs.579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drerup B. 2014. Rasterstereographic measurement of scoliotic deformity. Scoliosis. 9(1):22. eng. Epub 2014 Dec 12. 10.1186/s13013-014-0022-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faria R, McKenna C, Wade R, Yang H, Woolacott N, Sculpher M. 2013. The EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a cost-effectiveness analysis quantifying the health benefits from reduced radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. 82:e342–9. Epub 2013 Mar 7. eng. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer MCM, Krooß F, Habor J, Radermacher K. 2019. A robust method for automatic identification of landmarks on surface models of the pelvis. Sci Rep. 9(1):13322. eng. Epub 2019 Sep 16. 10.1038/s41598-019-49573-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frerich JM, Hertzler K, Knott P, Mardjetko S. 2012. Comparison of radiographic and surface topography measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthop J. 6:261–265. Epub 2012 Jul 27. eng. 10.2174/1874325001206010261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghaneei M, Ekyalimpa R, Westover L, Parent EC, Adeeb S. 2019. Customized k-nearest neighbourhood analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using 3D markerless asymmetry analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 22:696–705. Epub 2019 Mar 8. eng. 10.1080/10255842.2019.1584795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaneei M, Komeili A, Li Y, Parent EC, Adeeb S. 2018. 3D markerless asymmetry analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 19(1):385. eng. Epub 2018 Oct 24. 10.1186/s12891-018-2303-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• González-Ruiz JM, Pérez-Núñez MI, García-Alfaro MD, Bastir M. 2021a. Geometric morphometrics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective observational study. Eur Spine J. 30(3):612–619. eng. Epub 2020 Sep 5. 10.1007/s00586-020-06583-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ruiz JM, Pérez-Núñez MI, García-Alfaro MD, Bastir M. 2021b. How can directional and fluctuating asymmetry help in the prognosis of scoliosis along the course of the condition? J Anat. 239(6):1400–1408. eng. Epub 2021 Jul 14. 10.1111/joa.13509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ruiz JM, Pérez-Núñez MI, García-Alfaro MD, Bastir M. 2021c. Investigating human torso asymmetries: an observational longitudinal study of fluctuating and directional asymmetry in the Scoliotic Torso. Symmetry. 13(10):1821. doi: 10.3390/sym13101821.
   Google Scholar
• Goris BCE, Kuipers M, de Vries J, Wever DJ, Verkerke GJ, Veldhuizen AG. 2002. On the determination of the angular orientation of a vertebra. J Biomech Eng. 124:134–136. eng. doi:10.1115/1.1431265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E. 2002. 3-D back surface analysis of severe idiopathic scoliosis by rasterstereography: comparison of rasterstereographic and digitized radiometric data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 88:86–89. eng.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hui SCN, Pialasse J-P, Wong JYH, Lam T-P, BKW N, Cheng JCY, Chu WCW. 2016. Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” winner in imaging research. Winner In Imaging Research Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 11(1):46. eng. Epub 2016 Dec 29. 10.1186/s13013-016-0106-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komeili A, Westover L, Parent EC, El-Rich M, Adeeb S. 2015a. Correlation between a novel surface topography asymmetry analysis and radiographic data in scoliosis. Spine Deform. 3(4):303–311. eng. Epub 2015 Jun 11. 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.02.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komeili A, Westover L, Parent EC, El-Rich M, Adeeb S. 2015b. Monitoring for idiopathic scoliosis curve progression using surface topography asymmetry analysis of the torso in adolescents. Spine J. 15:743–751. Epub 2015 Jan 20. eng. 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komeili A, Westover LM, Parent EC, Moreau M, El-Rich M, Adeeb S. 2014. Surface topography asymmetry maps categorizing external deformity in scoliosis. Spine J. 14(6):973–83.e2. eng. Epub 2013 Oct 17. 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. 2013. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop. 7:3–9. Epub 2012 Dec 11. eng. 10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nowak R, Tokarowski A, Mrozek S, Wojciechowski P. 1995. Porównanie trzech róznych metod oceny kata rotacji osiowej w idiopatycznych bocznych skrzywieniach kregosłupa [Comparison of three different methods of axial rotation assessment in idiopathic scoliosis]. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 60(3):161–166. pol.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peeters CMM, Bos GJFJ, Kempen DHR, Jutte PC, Faber C, Wapstra FH. 2022. Assessment of spine length in scoliosis patients using EOS imaging: a validity and reliability study. Eur Spine J. 31(12):3527–3535. eng. Epub 2022 Oct 15. 10.1007/s00586-022-07326-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestigiacomo FG, Hulsbosch MHHM, Bruls VEJ, Nieuwenhuis JJ. 2022. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 10(1):79–86. eng. Epub 2021 Aug 12. 10.1007/s43390-021-00398-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS, Stovall M, Lonstein JE, Doody MM. 2010. Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders. Radiat Res. 174:83–90. eng. doi: 10.1667/RR2022.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstock S, Weiss H-R, Krueger D, Kleban V, Paul L. 2020. Innovative decision support for scoliosis brace therapy based on statistical modelling of markerless 3D trunk surface data. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 23:923–933. Epub 2020 Jun 16. eng. 10.1080/10255842.2020.1773449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su X, Dong R, Wen Z, Liu Y. 2022. Reliability and validity of scoliosis measurements obtained with surface topography techniques: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 11(23):11. eng. Epub 2022 Nov 26. 10.3390/jcm11236998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trobisch P, Suess O, Schwab F. 2010. Idiopathic scoliosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 107:875–883. quiz 884. Epub 2010 Dec 10. eng. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer J. 1999. Improved laplacian smoothing of noisy surfacemeshes. EUROGRAPHICS ‘99.
   Google Scholar
• Wade R, Yang H, McKenna C, Faria R, Gummerson N, Woolacott N. 2013. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system. Eur Spine J. 22(2):296–304. eng. Epub 2012 Aug 19. 10.1007/s00586-012-2469-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar