Demand pull or supply push? Metro-level analysis of start-ups in the United States

References

• Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography, and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510816
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 757–774.10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alañón-Pardo, Á., & Arauzo-Carod, J. (2013). Agglomeration, accessibility and industrial location: Evidence from Spain. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25, 135–173.10.1080/08985626.2012.710263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422–448.10.1006/juec.1997.2032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arauzo-Carod, J., & Manjón-Antolín, M. (2012). (Optimal) spatial aggregation in the determinants of industrial location. Small Business Economics, 39, 645–658.10.1007/s11187-011-9335-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcroft, B., & Love, J. H. (1996). Firm births and employment change in the British counties: 1981-89. Papers in Regional Science, 75, 483–500.10.1007/BF02412291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In J. Vernon Henderson & J.-F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of urban and regional economics (pp. 2713–2740). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competiveness, university spillovers and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39, 587–601.10.1007/s11187-011-9332-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2002). Public/private technology partnerships: Evaluating SBIR-supported research. Research Policy, 31, 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AUTM. (2012). AUTM U.S. Licensing activity survey. Deerfield, IL: Association of University Technology Managers.
   Google Scholar
• AUTM. (2016). Principles and guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.autm.net/advocacy-topics/government-issues/principles-and-guidelines/
   Google Scholar
• Birch, D. L. (1987). Job creation in America: How our smallest companies put the most people to work. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business economics, Online First, 1–20
   Google Scholar
• Chapple, K., Markusen, A., Schrock, G., Yamamoto, D., & Yu, P. (2004). Gauging metropolitan “High-Tech” and “I-Tech” activity. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 10–29.10.1177/0891242403257948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinitz, B. (1961). Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. American Economic Review, 51, 279–289.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. S. (2003). Purpose and performance of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. Small Business Economics, 30, 137–151.10.1023/A:1022212015154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. (2003). Health, inequality, and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 113–158.10.1257/jel.41.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degroof, J.-J., & Roberts, E. B. (2004). Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures ( Industrial Performance Center Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• DeVol, R. C., Klowden, K., Bedroussian, A., & Yeo, B. (2009). North America’s high-tech economy: The geography of knowledge-based industries. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, J., McCarthy, N., & O’Connor, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship and employment growth across European regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3, 121–128.10.1080/21681376.2015.1135406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. (2011). Regional industrial structure concentration in the United States: Trends and implications. Economic Geography, 87, 421–452.10.1111/ecge.2011.87.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J., & Feser, E. (2012). Regional industrial structure and agglomeration economies: An analysis of productivity in three manufacturing industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 1–14.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Kerr, W. R. (2015). The logic of agglomeration ( NBER Working Paper 21452). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, February.10.3386/w21452
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. W. (1986). Comparisons of agglomeration: Or what Chinitz really said. Urban Studies, 23, 387–389.10.1080/00420988620080561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggian, A., & McCann, P. (2006). Human capital and regional knowledge assets: A simultaneous equation model. Oxford Economic Papers, 583, 475–500.10.1093/oep/gpl010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairie, R. (2010). Kauffman index of entrepreneurial activity. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Fairlie, R. (2014). Kauffman index of entrepreneurial activity. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84, 210–229.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. (2002). Measuring the quality of regional innovation systems: A knowledge production function approach. International Regional Science Review, 25, 86–101.10.1177/016001702762039394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. (2008). How does new business formation affect regional development? Small Business Economics, 30(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: The case of German. Small Business Economics, 30, 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152.10.1086/261856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29–47.10.2307/3440244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haltiwanger, J. (2012). Job creation and firm dynamics in the U.S. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 12, 17–38.10.1086/663154
   Google Scholar
• Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 347–361.10.1162/REST_a_00288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker, D. E. (2005). High-technology employment: A NAICS-based update. Monthly Labor Review, July, 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V. (1986). Efficiency of resource usage and city size. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 47–70.10.1016/0094-1190(86)90030-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V. (2003). Marshall’s scale economies. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(1), 1–28.10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00505-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindle, K. (2010). How community context affects entrepreneurial process: A diagnostic framework. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22, 599–647.10.1080/08985626.2010.522057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Fogarty, M. S., & Banks, B. A. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVI, 183–205.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic location of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63, 577–598.10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jofre-Monseny, J., Marín-López, R., & Viladecans-Marsal, E. (2011). The mechanisms of agglomeration: Evidence from the effect of inter-industry relations on the location of new firms. Journal of Urban Economics, 70, 61–74.10.1016/j.jue.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kask, C., & Sieber, E. (2002). Productivity growth in ‘high-tech’ manufacturing industries. Monthly Labor Review, March, 16–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. (2000). Government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. The Journal of Private Equity, 3, 55–78.10.3905/jpe.2000.319960
   Google Scholar
• Losch, A. (1954). Economics of location. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1898). Principles of economics (4th ed.). London: Macmillan and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, H. (2007). What is the role of the university in creating a high-technology region? Journal of Urban Technology, 14, 33–58.10.1080/10630730801924225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2007). Sketching out a model of innovation, face-to-face interaction and economic geography. Spatial Economic Analysis, 2, 117–134.10.1080/17421770701346622
   Google Scholar
• McCray, W. P. (2005). Will small be beautiful? Making policies for our nanotech future. History and Technology, 21, 177–203.10.1080/07341510500103735
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. (2012). The new geography of jobs. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Motoyama, Y. (2015). The state-level analysis of high-growth firms. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 27, 213–227.
   Google Scholar
• Motoyama, Y., Appelbaum, R. P., & Parker, R. (2011). The national nanotechnology initiative: Federal support for science and technology, or hidden industrial policy? Technology in Society, 33, 109–118.10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.010
   Google Scholar
• Motoyama, Y., & Mayer, H. (2017). Revisiting the role of university in regional economic development: A triangulation of data. Growth and Change.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, R. D. (1992). Agglomeration and competitiveness: From Marshall to Chinitz. Urban Studies, 29, 155–170.10.1080/00420989220080241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plosila, W. H. (2004). State science- and technology-based economic development policy: History, trends and developments, and future directions. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 113–126.10.1177/0891242404263621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations. New York, NY: Free Press.10.1007/978-1-349-14865-3
   Google Scholar
• Puga, D. (2010). The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies. Journal of Regional Science, 50, 203–219.10.1111/jors.2010.50.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa, C. M., Geiger, R. L., & Hallacher, P. M. (2008). Universities and state policy formation: Rationalizing a nanotechnology strategy in Pennsylvania. Review of Policy Research, 25, 3–19.10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. L. (1999). Silicon Valley’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A., Motoyama, Y., & Quan, X. (2002). Local and global networks of immigrant professionals in Silicon Valley. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1926). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgley, N., & Elmslie, B. (2004). The geographic concentration of knowledge: Scale, agglomeration, and congestion in innovation across U.S. States. International Regional Science Review, 27, 111–137.10.1177/0160017603262401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, C. J., & Nardinelli, C. (2002). “Human capital and the rise of American cities”. 1900–1999. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32, 59–96.10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00069-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, H. M., Partridge, M. D., & Faggian, A. (2013). Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth in lagging regions. Journal of Regional Science, 53, 778–812.10.1111/jors.2013.53.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau (2013). New measures for accessions, separations, and turnover in the Quarterly Workforce Indicators. In LEHD Program Staff (Ed.), Washington DC: US Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. (2012). Patterns of metropolitan and micropolitan population change: 2000 to 2010. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/reports/c2010sr-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R. D. (1986). Through the eye of the needle: Immigrants and enterprise in New York’s garment trades. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R. D., Aldrich, H., & Ward, R. (1990). Ethnic entrepreneurs: Immigrant business in industrial societies. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar