2,582
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special issue: Universities, innovation and regional development

Why do academics engage locally? Insights from the University of Stavanger

ORCID Icon
Pages 250-264 | Received 24 Sep 2018, Accepted 12 Feb 2019, Published online: 08 May 2019

REFERENCES

  • Agrawal, A. K. (2001). University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 285–302.
  • Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45, 905–917.
  • Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31, 387–408.
  • Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Benner, M., & Sandström, U. (2000). Institutionalizing the triple helix: Research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29, 291–301.
  • Benneworth, P., Charles, D., & Madanipour, A. (2010). Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university Spatial development. European Planning Studies, 18, 1611–1629.
  • Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies, 38, 1001–1014.
  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74.
  • Breznitz, S. M., & Feldman, M. P. (2012). The engaged university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 139–157.
  • Charles, D. (2006). Universities as key knowledge infrastructures in regional innovation systems. Innovation: European Journal of Social Science Research, 19, 117–130.
  • Charles, D. (2011). The role of universities in building knowledge cities in Australia. Built Environment, 37, 281–298.
  • Charles, D. (2016). The rural university campus and support for rural innovation. Science and Public Policy, 43, 763–773.
  • Chertow, M., & Miyata, Y. (2011). Assessing collective firm behavior: Comparing industrial symbiosis with possible alternatives for individual companies in Oahu, HI. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 266–280.
  • Christopherson, S., & Clark, J. (2010). Limits to ‘The learning region’: What university-centered economic development Can (and cannot) do to create knowledge-based regional economies. Local Economy: Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 25, 120–130.
  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Coe, N. M., & Bunnell, T. G. (2003). ‘Spatializing’ knowledge communities: Towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks. Global Networks, 3, 437–456.
  • Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5–15.
  • D’este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36, 1295–1313.
  • D’este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 316–339.
  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Minerva, 36, 271–288.
  • Fitjar, R. D., & Gjelsvik, M. (2018). Why do firms collaborate with local universities? Regional Studies, 52 (11), 1–12. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1413237
  • Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region. Futures, 27, 527–536.
  • Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega, 36, 173–187.
  • Franco, M., & Haase, H. (2015). University–industry cooperation: Researchers’ motivations and interaction channels. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 36, 41–51.
  • Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34, 47–68.
  • Goddard, J. B., & Chatterton, P. (1999). Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: Harnessing the potential of universities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17, 685–699.
  • Gunasekara, C. (2006). Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 101–113.
  • Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & De Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31, 498–501.
  • Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2000). Spatialising knowledge: Placing the knowledge community of Motor Sport Valley. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 31, 191–208.
  • Hossain, L., & Fazio, D. (2009). The social networks of collaborative process. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20, 119–130.
  • Lambooy, J. (2004). The transmission of knowledge, emerging networks, and the role of universities: An evolutionary approach. European Planning Studies, 12, 643–657.
  • Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011). Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 45, 507–523.
  • Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies, 33, 305–317.
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 5, 14–37.
  • Norn, T. N. (2016). What Lies Beneath the Surface? A Review of Academic and Policy Studies on Collaboration Between Public Research and Private Firms. Copenhagen: The Think Tank DEA/CFA (Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy), Aarhus University.
  • Pataraia, N., Margaryan, A., Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Discovering academics’ key learning connections: An ego-centric network approach to analysing learning about teaching. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26, 56–72.
  • Pataraia, N., Margaryan, A., Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). How and what do academics learn through their personal networks. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39, 336–357.
  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’este, P., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423–442.
  • Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259–280.
  • Pittz, T. G., & Intindola, M. (2015). Exploring absorptive capacity in cross-sector social partnerships. Management Decision, 53, 1170–1183.
  • Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., Macpherson, G., Baaken, T., & Rampersad, G. C. (2013). The evolution of university–industry linkages – A framework. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30, 21–44.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.
  • Ramos-Vielba, I., Fernández-Esquinas, M., & Espinosa-De-Los-Monteros, E. (2010). Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system. Scientometrics, 84, 649–667.
  • Ramos-Vielba, I., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., & Woolley, R. (2016). Scientific research groups’ cooperation with firms and government agencies: Motivations and barriers. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 558–585.
  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shaw, J. K., & Allison, J. (1999). The intersection of the learning region and local and regional economic development: Analysing the role of higher education. Regional Studies, 33, 896–902.
  • Sternberg, R. (2000). Innovation networks and regional development – evidence from the European regional innovation Survey (ERIS): Theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue. European Planning Studies, 8, 389–407.
  • Stuck, J., Broekel, T., & Revilla Diez, J. (2016). Network structures in regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 24, 423–442.
  • Tartari, V., Perkmann, M., & Salter, A. (2014). In good Company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Research Policy doi:10.2139/ssrn.1598456. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1598456.
  • Taylor, M., & Asheim, B. (2001). The concept of the firm in economic geography. Economic Geography, 77, 315–328.
  • Thune, T., Reymert, I., Gulbrandsen, M., & Olaf Aamodt, P. (2016). Universities and external engagement activities: Particular profiles for particular universities? Science and Public Policy, 43, 774–786.
  • Uyarra, E. (2010). Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, Implications and Contradictions. European Planning Studies, 18, 1227–1246.
  • Vorley, T., & Nelles, J. (2009). Building entrepreneurial architectures: A conceptual interpretation of the third mission. Policy Futures in Education, 7, 284–296.
  • Wilson, J. R. (2014). Essentials of business research, A guide to doing you research project. London: Sage publications Ltd.
  • Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.