Third mission and regional context: assessing universities’ entrepreneurial architecture in rural regions

REFERENCES

• Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 9. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R., & Karlsen, J. (2016). One size does not fit all! New perspectives on the university in the social knowledge economy. Science and Public Policy, 46(6), 731–735.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R., & Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2017). Strategic agency and institutional change: Investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs). Regional Studies, 51(2), 235–248. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1215599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., & Sanderson, A. (2009). The regional engagement of universities: Building capacity in a sparse innovation environment. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1787/hemp-v21-art8-en
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, G., Conway, C., & Van der Meer, E. (2003). Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Regional Studies, 37(9), 887–897. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000143896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, M. S., & Feldman, M. P. (2012). The engaged university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 139–157. doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9183-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Educational research and innovation. (1982). The university and the community: The problems of changing relationships. Paris: OECD-CERI.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, D. (2016). The rural university campus and support for rural innovation. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 763–773. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, D., Kitagawa, F., & Uyarra, E. (2014). University in Crisis? – New challenges and strategies in two English city-regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 327–348. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rst029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P., & Goddard, J. (2000). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 475–496. doi: 10.1111/1467-3435.00041
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. (1998). Entrepreneurial universities. Organizational pathways of transformation. IAU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Science Information, 52(3), 486–511. doi: 10.1177/0539018413485832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Kloften, M. (2005). The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, L., & Gibson (Eds.). (2015). The entrepreneurial university. Context and institutional change Routledge studies in Innovation, Organization and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greater Lincolnshire Local Economic Partnership Strategic Economic Plan 2014–2030. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.greaterlincolnshirelep.co.uk/assets/documents/Strategic_Economic_Plan_2016_Refresh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303–324. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, F., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., & Uyarra, E. (2016). Third mission as institutional strategies: Between isomorphic forces and heterogeneous pathways. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 736–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, A. (2015). Kymenlaakso University of Applied Sciences, Finland in search of university-wide. In L. Foss & Gibson (Eds.), The entrepreneurial university. Context and institutional change (pp. 167–190). Abingdon: Routledge. Studies in Innovation, Organization and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., & Vorley, T. (2010a). Constructing an entrepreneurial architecture: An emergent framework for studying the contemporary university beyond the entrepreneurial turn. Innovative Higher Education, 35(3), 161–176. doi: 10.1007/s10755-009-9130-3
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., & Vorley, T. (2010b). From policy to practice: Engaging and embedding the third mission in contemporary universities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(7/8), 341–353. doi: 10.1108/01443331011060706
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., & Vorley, T. (2011). Entrepreneurial architecture: A blueprint for entrepreneurial universities. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de L’Administration, 28(3), 341–353. doi: 10.1002/cjas.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieth, L., Benneworth, P., Charles, D., Fonseca, L., Rodrigues, C., Salomaa, M., & Stienstra, M. (2018). Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: Reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes. European Planning Studies, 26(11), 2147–2166. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1530144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oftedal, E., & Foss, L. (2015). Uit The Arctic University of Norway challenges at the arctic crossroads. In L. Foss & Gibson (Eds.), The entrepreneurial university. Context and institutional change (pp. 190–220). Abingdon: Routledge. Studies in Innovation, Organization and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Oftedal, E., & Iakovleva, T. (2015). Stavanger from petroleum focus to diversified competence through crisis and consensus. In L. Foss & Gibson (Eds.), The entrepreneurial university. Context and institutional change (pp. 221–249). Abingdon: Routledge. Studies in Innovation, Organization and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Regeneris Consulting. (2017). The social, cultural & economic contribution of the University of Lincoln – A final report.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Delhi: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Science and Innovation Audit. (2016). A science and innovation audit (SIA) report for the midlands engine. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Volume 1: Main Report.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Kosonen, K.-M. (2003). Institutional capacity and strategic adaptation in less favoured regions: A South Ostrobothnia University network as a case in point. Industrial Performance Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology IPC Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., & Benner, M. (2013). Doomed to be entrepreneurial: Institutional transformation or institutional lock-ins of ‘new’ universities? Minerva, 51, 399–416. doi: 10.1007/s11024-013-9238-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universities UK. (2001). The regional mission – The regional contribution of higher education. East Midlands: Innovation through diversity.
   Google Scholar
• University of Lincoln. (2016). Thinking ahead 2016–2021. Lincoln: University of Lincoln Strategic Plan.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. (2010). Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1227–1246. doi: 10.1080/09654311003791275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorley, T., & Nelles, J. (2009). Building entrepreneurial architectures: A conceptual interpretation of the third mission. Policy Futures in Education, 7(3), 284–296. doi: 10.2304/pfie.2009.7.3.284
   Google Scholar
• Vorley, T., & Nelles, J. (2012). Scaling entrepreneurial architecture: The challenge of managing regional technology transfer in Hamburg. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 181–198). Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar