Regional and international inter-organizational STI and DUI collaborations as carriers for eco-innovation

REFERENCES

• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2016). Local buzz, global pipelines, or simply too much buzz? A critical study. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 75, 129–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhusen, H., & Bennat, T. (2021). Combinatorial innovation modes in SMEs: Mechanisms integrating STI processes into DUI mode learning and the role of regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 29(4), 779–805. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1786009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arranz, N., F. Arroyabe, C., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2019). The effect of regional factors in the development of eco-innovations in the firm. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1406–1415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Parrilli, M. D. (2012). Introduction: Learning and interaction — drivers for innovation in current competitive markets. In B. T. Asheim, & M. D. Parrilli (Eds.), Interactive learning for innovation: A Key driver within clusters and innovation systems (pp. 1–29). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A. (2012). Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry. Regional Studies, 46(6), 741–756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.529121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Arfi, W., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J.-M. (2018). External knowledge sources, Green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 210–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitencourt, C. C., De Oliveira Santini, F., Zanandrea, G., Froehlich, C., & Ladeira, W. J. (2020). Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. (2007). Assessing recent developments in innovation measurement: The third edition of the Oslo manual. Science and Public Policy, 34(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X190487
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2015). Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 211–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Montresor, S. (2012). Environmental innovations, local networks and internationalization. Industry and Innovation, 19(8), 697–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.739782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravella, S., & Crespi, F. (2020). Unfolding heterogeneity: The different policy drivers of different eco-innovation modes. Environmental Science & Policy, 114, 182–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Río, P., Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Könnölä, T., & Bleda, M. (2016). Resources, capabilities and competences for eco-innovation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(2), 274–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1070301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R., & Guillaume, R. (2015). Collaboration, transferable and non-transferable knowledge, and innovation: A study of a cool climate wine industry (Canada). Growth and Change, 46(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R., Porto-Gomez, I., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2020). DUI and STI innovation modes in the Canadian wine industry: The geography of interaction modes. Growth and Change, 51(3), 890–909. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenge. In J. Fargerberg, D. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrizi, A., Guarini, G., & Meliciani, V. (2018). Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Research Policy, 47(6), 1018–1031. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Verspagen, B. (2009). The evolution of Norway's national innovation system. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 431–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X460944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., Huber, F., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). Not too close, not too far: Testing the goldilocks principle of ‘optimal’ distance in innovation networks. Industry and Innovation, 23(6), 465–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1184562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). Where cities fail to triumph: The impact of urban location and local collaboration on innovation in Norway. Journal of Regional Science, 60(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliano, D., Gonçalves, A., & Triboulet, P. (2019). The peripheral systems of eco-innovation: Evidence from eco-innovative agro-food projects in a French rural area. Journal of Rural Studies, 72, 273–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2015). The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy, 44(5), 1080–1093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Moreno, Á, Triguero, Á, & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2019). Many or trusted partners for eco-innovation? The influence of breadth and depth of firms’ knowledge network in the food sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 51–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Pernía, J. L., Parrilli, M. D., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2015). STI–DUI learning modes, firm–university collaboration and innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9352-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672–1684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.873120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haus-Reve, S., Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2019). Does combining different types of collaboration always benefit firms? Collaboration, complementarity and product innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 48(6), 1476–1486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, J. (2014). Do eco-innovations need specific regional characteristics? An econometric analysis for Germany. Review of Regional Research, 34(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-013-0079-4
   Google Scholar
• Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Innovation in space: The mosaic of regional innovation patterns. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 122–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00483642.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, W., & Yeaple, S. R. (2013). The gravity of knowledge. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1414–1444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.4.1414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2008). MEI project about Measuring Eco-Innovation. Final report: MERIT, Maastricht (Netherlands); Directorate-General Research, European Commission, Brussels (Belgium).
   Google Scholar
• Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., Schlägel, C., & Welpe, I. M. (2020). Green together? The effects of companies’ innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation. Industry and Innovation, 27(9), 953–990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1713733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719400000002
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2018). Linking content and technology: On the geography of innovation networks in the Bergen media cluster. Industry and Innovation, 25(10), 966–989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1343132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2017). Forms of knowledge and eco-innovation modes: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 131, 208–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, M.-P. (2015). Interrelating dynamic proximities by bridging, reducing and producing distances. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1892–1907. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.848978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocampo-Corrales, D. B., Moreno, R., & Suriñach, J. (2021). Knowledge flows and technologies in renewable energies at the regional level in Europe. Regional Studies, 55(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1807489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD & Communities. (2005). Oslo manual.
   Google Scholar
• Parrilli, M. D., & Alcalde Heras, H. (2016). STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific–technological and context-specific nuances. Research Policy, 45(4), 747–756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrilli, M. D., & Radicic, D. (2021). STI and DUI innovation modes in micro-, small-, medium- and large-sized firms: Distinctive patterns across Europe and the U.S. European Planning Studies, 29(2), 346–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1754343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, D. D. T., Paillé, P., & Halilem, N. (2019). Systematic review on environmental innovativeness: A knowledge-based resource view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1088–1099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szumilas, M. (2010). Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(3), 227–229. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20842279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triguero, A., Fernández, S., & Sáez-Martinez, F. J. (2018). Inbound open innovative strategies and eco-innovation in the Spanish food and beverage industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 49–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 92, 25–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Erauskin-Tolosa, A., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2018). Shedding light on the determinants of eco-innovation: A meta-analytic study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1093–1103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar