1,222
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Emergence of new industries in peripheral regions: the role of narratives in delegitimation of onshore wind in the Arctic Finnmark region

& ORCID Icon
Pages 603-617 | Received 29 Sep 2021, Accepted 05 Sep 2022, Published online: 20 Oct 2022

REFERENCES

  • Afewerki, S. (2020). Global production networks and industrial restructuring: Unpacking the emerging offshore wind industry [Doctoral dissertation]. Dept. of Geography, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Binz, C., & Gong, H. (2021). Legitimation dynamics in industrial path development: New-to-the-world versus new-to-the-region industries. Regional Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861238
  • Binz, C., Harris-Lovett, S., Kiparsky, M., Sedlak, D. L., & Truffer, B. (2016a). The thorny road to technology legitimation – Institutional work for potable water reuse in California. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.005
  • Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems – A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016b). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
  • Bækkelund, N. G. (2021). Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies, 55(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291
  • Blazek, J., Kveton, V., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., & Trippl, M. (2020). The dark side of regional industrial path development: Towards a typology of trajectories of decline. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1455–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1685466
  • Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, J., Klitkou, A., & Steen, M. (2019). Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013
  • Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., & Pike, A. (2015). Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in north east England and Scotland. Cambridge journal of regions. Economy and Society, 8, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu036
  • De Vaan, M., Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. (2019). The downside of social capital in New industry creation. Economic Geography, 95(4), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1586434
  • Eikeland, S. (2021). Indigenous agency in global systems. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.028
  • Ellis, G., & Ferrara, G. (2016). In E. N. E (Ed.), The social acceptance of wind energy: Where we stand and the path ahead. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Essletzbichler, J. (2012). Renewable energy technology and path creation: A multi-scalar approach to energy transition in the UK. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 791–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667926
  • Finnmark fylkeskommune [Finnmark County Council]. (2013). Regional vindkraftplan for Finnmark 2013-2015 [Regional wind power plan for Finnmark 2013-2025]. https://www.tffk.no/_f/p1/i827c1399-5736-40ae-a0e7-2d4edae3eaa0/regional-vindkraftplan-for-finnmark-2013-2025.pdf
  • Fitjar, R. D. (2013). Region-building in the Arctic periphery: The discursive construction of a petroleum region. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, 95(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12010
  • Fløysand, A., & Jakobsen, S. E. (2016). Industrial renewal: Narratives in play in the development of green technologies in the Norwegian salmon farming industry. The Geographical Journal, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12194
  • Fløysand, A., Njøs, R., Nilsen, T., & Nygaard, V. (2016). Foreign direct investment and renewal of industries: Framing the reciprocity between materiality and discourse. European Planning Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1226785
  • Fløysand, A., Sjøtun, S. G., Jakobsen, S.-E., Njøs, R., Tvedt, H. L., Gjelsvik, M., & Aarstad, J. (2022). Institutional work, regional key actors, and green industrial restructuring. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 76(1), 14–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2022.2040586
  • Gherhes, C., Vorley, T., Vallance, P., & Brooks, C. (2022). The role of system-building agency in regional path creation: Insights from the emergence of artificial intelligence in Montreal. Regional Studies, 56(4), 563–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1886273
  • Gong, H. (2020). Multi-scalar legitimation of a contested industry: A case study of the Hamburg video games industry. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 114, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.005
  • Gong, H., Binz, C., Hassink, R., & Trippl, M. (2022). Emerging industries: Institutions, legitimacy and system-level agency. Regional Studies, 56(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2033199
  • Grillitsch, M., & Hansen, T. (2019). Green industrial path development in different types of regions papers in innovation studies CIRCLE. Lund University.
  • Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2019). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
  • Haarstad, H., & Fløysand, A. (2007). Globalization and the power of rescaled narratives: A case of opposition to mining in Tambogrande, Peru. Political Geography, 26(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.10.014
  • Heiberg, J., Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2020). The geography of technology legitimation: How multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography, 96(5), 470–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189
  • Isaksen, A. (2018). From success to failure, the disappearance of clusters: A study of a Norwegian boat-building cluster. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy007
  • Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
  • Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123101
  • Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). Industry legitimacy: Bright and dark phases in regional industry path development. Regional Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861236
  • MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K., & McMaster, R. (2009). Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic Geography, 85(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01017.x
  • MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
  • MacKinnon, D., Karlsen, A., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Afewerki, S., & Kenzhegliyeva, A. (2022). Legitimation, institutions and regional path creation: A cross-national study of offshore wind. Regional Studies, 56(4), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861239
  • Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
  • Markard, J., Wirth, S., & Truffer, B. (2016). Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy – A framework and a case study on biogas technology. Research Policy, 45(1), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.009
  • Martin, R. (2010). Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution.
  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
  • Matti, C., Consoli, D., & Uyarra, E. (2017). Multi level policy mixes and industry emergence: The case of wind energy in Spain. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16663933
  • Miörner, J. (2020). The road towards autonomous driving – A differentiated view of institutional agency in path transformation. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 74(5), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2020.1770852
  • Miörner, J. (2022). Contextualizing agency in new path development: How system selectivity shapes regional reconfiguration capacity. Regional Studies, 56(4), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854713
  • Nilsen, T. (2016). Why Arctic policies matter: The role of exogenous actions in oil and gas industry development in the Norwegian high north. Energy Research & Social Science, 16, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.010
  • Njøs, R., Sjøtun, S., Jakobsen, S.-E., & Fløysand, A. (2020). Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography, 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768
  • Oinas, P., Trippl, M., & Höyssä, M. (2018). Regional industrial transformations in the interconnected global economy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy015
  • Panori, A., Kostopolous, I., Karampinis, E., & Altsitsiadis, A. (2022). New path creation in energy transition: Exploring the interplay between resource formation and social acceptance of biomass adoption in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 86, 102400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102400
  • Rohe, S., & Chlebna, C. (2021). A spatial perspective on the legitimacy of a technological innovation system: Regional differences in onshore wind energy. Energy Policy, 151, 112193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112193
  • Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual material. Sage.
  • Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667924
  • Sjøtun, S. (2020). ‘Engineering’ the green transformation of the maritime industry in western Norway [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Bergen.
  • Sotarauta, M. (2017). An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16664906
  • Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh Set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1066r
  • Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1605–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
  • Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2018). Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography, 94(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
  • Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
  • Vale, M., & Carvalho, L. (2013). Knowledge networks and processes of anchoring in Portuguese biotechnology. Regional Studies, 47(7), 1018–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.644237
  • Vasstrøm, M., & Lysgård, H. K. (2021a). Drivkrefter, motkrefter og fremtidige utfordringer i norsk vindkraftpolitikk. Plan, 53(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3045-2021-01-08
  • Vasstrøm, M., & Lysgård, H. K. (2021b). What shapes Norwegian wind power policy? Analysing the constructing forces of policymaking and emerging questions of energy justice. Energy Research & Social Science, 77, 102089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102089
  • Yeung, H. W.-C. (2005). Rethinking relational economic geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00150.x
  • Yeung, H. W.-C. (2021). Regional worlds: From related variety in regional diversification to strategic coupling in global production networks. Regional Studies, 55(6), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1857719