851
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A long-term vision for rural areas: a case study of Sicilian farms

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 640-658 | Received 26 Nov 2022, Accepted 09 Jun 2023, Published online: 12 Jul 2023

REFERENCES

  • Altares, P. S., Copo, A. R. I., Gabuyo, Y. A., Laddaran, A. T., Mejia, L. D. P., Policarpio, I. A., Sy, E. A. G., Tizon, H. D., & Yao, A. M. S. D. (2003). Elementary statistics: A modern approach. Rex Bookstore Inc.
  • Arfini, F., Antonioli, F., Cozzi, E., Donati, M., Guareschi, M., Mancini, M. C., & Veneziani, M. (2019). Sustainability, innovation and rural development: The case of Parmigiano–Reggiano PDO. Sustainability, 11(18), 4978. doi:10.3390/su11184978
  • Aronica, M., Bonfanti, R. C., & Piacentino, D. (2021). Social media adoption in Italian firms. Opportunities and challenges for lagging regions. Papers in Regional Science, 100(4), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12606
  • Aronica, M., Cracolici, M. F., Insolda, D., Piacentino, D., & Tosi, S. (2021). The diversification of Sicilian farms: A way to sustainable rural development. Sustainability, 13(11), 6073. doi:10.3390/su13116073
  • Arzeni, A., Ascione, E., Borsotto, P., Carta, V., Castellotti, T., & Vagnozzi, A. (2021). Analysis of farms characteristics related to innovation needs: A proposal for supporting the public decision-making process. Land Use Policy, 100, 104892. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104892
  • Balezentis, T., Ribasauskiene, E., Morkunas, M., Volkov, A., Streimikiene, D., & Toma, P. (2020). Young farmers’ support under the common agricultural policy and sustainability of rural regions: Evidence from Lithuania. Land Use Policy, 94, 104542. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104542
  • Bartolini, F., & Viaggi, D. (2013). The common agricultural policy and the determinants of changes in EU farm size. Land Use Policy, 31, 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.007
  • Bowen, R., & Morris, W. (2019). The digital divide: Implications for agribusiness and entrepreneurship. Lessons from Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 72, 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.031
  • Capitanio, F., Gatto, E., & Millemaci, E. (2016). CAP payments and spatial diversity in cereal crops: An analysis of Italian farms. Land Use Policy, 54, 574–582. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.019
  • Coderoni, S., & Esposti, R. (2018). CAP payments and agricultural GHG emissions in Italy. A farm-level assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 427–437. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.197
  • Cortignani, R., & Dono, G. (2015). Simulation of the impact of greening measures in an agricultural area of the southern Italy. Land Use Policy, 48, 525–533. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.028
  • Daugbjerg, C. (2003). Policy feedback and paradigm shift in EU agricultural policy: The effects of the MacSharry reform on future reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(3), 421–437. doi:10.1080/1350176032000085388
  • De Castro, P., Miglietta, P. P., & Vecchio, Y. (2021). The common agricultural policy 2021–2027: A new history for European agriculture. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 75(3), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.13128/rea-12703
  • Dwyer, J., Ward, N., Lowe, P., & Baldock, D. (2007). European rural development under the common agricultural policy’s ‘second pillar’: Institutional conservatism and innovation. Regional Studies, 41(7), 873–888. doi:10.1080/00343400601142795
  • Esposti, R. (2012). Knowledge, technology and innovations for a bio-based economy: Lessons from the past, challenges for the future. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 1(3), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.13128/BAE-11145
  • European Commission. (2012). Communication from the commission to the European parliament and the council on the European Innovation Partnership ‘Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability’ Brussels, 29.2.2012 COM (2012).
  • European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal, Brussels, 11.12.2019 COM (2019), 640 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
  • European Commission. (2020a). Recovery plan for Europe.
  • European Commission. (2020b). Communication from the commission EUROPE 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels, 3.3.2010 COM (2010).
  • European Commission. (2020c). Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally friendly food system. https://ec.europa.eu/food/horizontal-topics/farm-fork-strategy_en#related.
  • European Commission. (2021a). EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 bringing nature back into our lives. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_en.
  • European Commission. (2021b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘A long-term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas – Towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040’ Brussels, 30.6.2021 COM (2021).
  • Fazio, G., & Piacentino, D. (2010). A spatial multilevel analysis of Italian SMEs’ productivity. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(3), 299–316. doi:10.1080/17421772.2010.493953
  • Frascarelli, A. (2017). L’evoluzione della Pac e le imprese agricole: Sessant’anni di adattamento. Online publication. Agriregioneuropa, 13. https://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/50/levoluzione-della-pac-e-le-imprese-agricole-sessantanni-di-adattamento
  • García-Cortijo, M. C., Castillo-Valero, J. S., & Carrasco, I. (2019). Innovation in rural Spain. What drives innovation in the rural–peripheral areas of Southern Europe? Journal of Rural Studies, 71, 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.027
  • Garini, C. S., Vanwindekens, F., Scholberg, J. M. S., Wezel, A., & Groot, J. C. (2017). Drivers of adoption of agroecological practices for winegrowers and influence from policies in the province of Trento, Italy. Land Use Policy, 68, 200–211. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.048
  • Gregori, M., & Sillani, S. (2012). Cinquant’anni di PAC: riflessioni in un’ottica di lungo periodo | Agriregionieuropa (univpm.it). Agriregioneuropa, 8(28), 63. https://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/28/cinquantanni-di-pac-riflessioni-unottica-di-lungo-periodo
  • Grimes, S., & Lyons, G. (1994). Information technology and rural development: Unique opportunity or potential threat? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 6(3), 219–237. doi:10.1080/08985629400000013
  • Guilford, J. P., & Frucher, B. (1973). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill.
  • Henke, R. (2002). Dalla Riforma MacSharry ad Agenda 2000: Il processo di greening della Pac. La Questione Agraria, n.1.
  • Henke, R. (2004). Il riorientamento delle politiche di sostegno all’agricoltura dell’UE. Politica Agraria Internazionale, n. 1–2.
  • Hosseininia, G., & Ramezani, A. (2016). Factors influencing sustainable entrepreneurship in small and medium-sized enterprises in Iran: A case study of food industry. Sustainability, 8(10), 1010. doi:10.3390/su8101010
  • Läpple, D., Renwick, A., & Thorne, F. (2015). Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland. Food Policy, 51, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.11.003
  • Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2021). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, p. 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359.
  • Mack, G., Fintineru, G., & Kohler, A. (2021). Effects of EU rural development funds on newly established enterprises in Romania's rural areas. European Planning Studies, 29(2), 291–311. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1746243
  • Mantino, F. (2015). La riforma della PAC e dei Fondi Strutturali 2014–2020: quale impatto sulla governance. Agriregioneuropa, 41. https://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/41/la-riforma-della-pac-e-dei-fondi-strutturali-2014-2020-quale-impatto-sulla
  • Marandola, D., & Vanni, F. (2019). Le sfide della nuova architettura verde della Pac post 2020. Agriregioneuropa, 56. https://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/56/le-sfide-della-nuova-architettura-verde-della-pac-post-2020
  • Marescotti, M. E., Demartini, E., Filippini, R., & Gaviglio, A. (2021). Smart farming in mountain areas: Investigating livestock farmers’ technophobia and technophilia and their perception of innovation. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 463–472. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.015
  • McFadden, T., & Gorman, M. (2016). Exploring the concept of farm household innovation capacity in relation to farm diversification in policy context. Journal of Rural Studies, 46, 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.05.006
  • Mikhaylova, A. A., Mikhaylov, A. S., & Hvaley, D. V. (2021). Receptiveness to innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Asymmetries in the adoption of digital routines. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 8(1), 311–327. doi:10.1080/21681376.2021.1962400
  • Moro, D., & Sckokai, P. (2013). The impact of decoupled payments on farm choices: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Food Policy, 41, 28–38. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.04.001
  • Morris, J., Morris, W., & Bowen, R. (2022). Implications of the digital divide on rural SME resilience. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 369–377. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.01.005
  • Norris, L. (2020). The spatial implications of rural business digitalization: Case studies from Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7(1), 499–510. doi:10.1080/21681376.2020.1841674
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Bridging the rural digital divide, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 265. OECD Publ. https://doi.org/10.1787/852bd3b9-en
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020a). Policy implications of coronavirus crisis for rural development. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=134_134479-8kq0i6epcq&title=Policy-Implications-of-Coronavirus-Crisis-for-Rural-Development.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020b). Managing environmental and energy transitions for regions and cities. OECD Publ. https://doi.org/10.1787/f0c6621f-en
  • Pelucha, M., & Kveton, V. (2017). The role of EU rural development policy in the neo-productivist agricultural paradigm. Regional Studies, 51(12), 1860–1870. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1282608
  • Räisänen, J., & Tuovinen, T. (2020). Digital innovations in rural micro-enterprises. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 56–67. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.010
  • Randelli, F., Romei, P., & Tortora, M. (2014). An evolutionary approach to the study of rural tourism: The case of Tuscany. Land Use Policy, 38, 276–281. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.009
  • Rizov, M. (2004). Rural development and welfare implications of CAP reforms. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(2), 209–222. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.03.003
  • Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
  • Stojcheska, A. M., Kotevska, A., Bogdanov, N., & Nikolić, A. (2016). How do farmers respond to rural development policy challenges? Evidence from Macedonia, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Land Use Policy, 59, 71–83. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.019