Correlated η–μ fading channels with channel estimation error

References

• Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1965). Handbook of mathematical functions: With formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables (Vol. 55). Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Badarneh, O. S., & Almehmadi, F. S. (2016). Performance analysis of l-branch maximal ratio combining over generalised η- µ fading channels with imperfect channel estimation. IET Communications, 10(10), 1175–1182. doi:10.1049/iet-com.2015.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, D., & Subadar, R. (2019). Performance analysis of qam for l-mrc receiver with estimation error over independent hoyt fading channels. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 107, 15–20. doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2019.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, P., & Subadar, R. (2018). Performance analysis of QAM for M-SC receiver over TWDP fading channels. International Journal of Electronics Letters, 6(4), 438–444. doi:10.1080/21681724.2017.1382000
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, D., & Sahu, P. R. (2013, April). Performance of QAM signaling over TWDP fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(4), 1794–1799. doi:10.1109/TWC.2013.030413.120772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermolova, N. Y., & Tirkkonen, O. (2012, April). Multivariate η − µ fading distribution with constant correlation model. IEEE Communications Letters, 16(4), 454–457. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2012.020712.112160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2014). Table of integrals, series, and products. Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, W., Lee, J., & Yoon, D. (2011). New BER expression of MPSK. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(4), 1916–1924. doi:10.1109/TVT.2011.2114903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., & Jin, J. (2007). Effect of channel estimation errors on m-qam with mrc and egc in nakagami fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 56(3), 1239–1250. doi:10.1109/TVT.2007.895491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Schober, R., & Pasupathy, S. (2005a). Effect of channel estimation errors on MRC diversity in Rician fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 54(6), 2137–2142. doi:10.1109/TVT.2005.853454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Schober, R., & Pasupathy, S. (2005b). Performance of M-PSK with GSC and EGC with Gaussian weighting errors. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 54(1), 149–162. doi:10.1109/TVT.2004.839674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Schober, R., & Zhang, D. (2007). Exact ber for m-qam with mrc and imperfect channel estimation in rician fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(3), 926–936. doi:10.1109/TWC.2007.05243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikia, B., & Subadar, R. (2019). Effect of estimation error on dual mrc receiver over hoyt fading channels. International Journal of Electronics Letters, 7(4), 400–409. doi:10.1080/21681724.2018.1523470
   Google Scholar
• Subadar, R., & Sahu, P. R. (2011, May). Performance of a L-MRC receiver over equally correlated η − µ fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(5), 1351–1355. doi:10.1109/TWC.2011.030411.100563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suraweera, H. A., Lee, W. S., & Oh, S. H. (2008, February). Performance analysis of QAM in a two-wave with diffuse power fading environment. IEEE Communications Letters, 12(2), 109–111. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2008.071699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., Alouini, M.-S., & Goldsmith, A. J. (1999). Effect of channel estimation error on m-qam ber performance in rayleigh fading. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 47(12), 1856–1864. doi:10.1109/26.809706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yacoub, M. D. (2000, Sep.). The η − µ distribution: A general fading distribution. In Vehicular technology conference fall 2000. ieee vts fall vtc2000. 52nd vehicular technology conference (Vol. 2, p. 872–877 vol.2). Boston, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yacoub, M. D. (2007, February). The κ − µ distribution and the η − µ distribution. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 49(1), 68–81. doi:10.1109/MAP.2007.370983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar