Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Urology Volume 52, 2018 - Issue 5-6
Journal homepage
124
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Renal tumor biopsies are associated with a low complication rate

S. A. ToloueeDepartment of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark;
,
M. MadsenDepartment of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark;
,
K. D. BergDepartment of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark;
,
C. DahlDepartment of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark;
,
M. FodeDepartment of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark;
&
N. H. AzawiDepartment of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark; ;Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7519-8654
ORCID Icon
Pages 407-410 | Received 12 Apr 2018, Accepted 12 Sep 2018, Published online: 18 Nov 2018

References

  • Tyson MD, Humphreys MR, Parker AS, et al. Age-period-cohort analysis of renal cell carcinoma in United States adults. Urology. 2013;82:43–47.
  • Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, et al. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA. 1999;281:1628–1631.
  • Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, et al. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1331–1334.
  • Schieda N, Al-Subhi M, Flood TA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma using biphasic computed tomography (CT) and multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Eur Radiol. 2014;24:2787–2794.
  • Woo S, Suh CH, Cho JY, et al. Diagnostic performance of CT for diagnosis of fat-poor angiomyolipoma in patients with renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;209(5):W297–W307.
  • Lindkvist Pedersen C, Winck-Flyvholm L, Dahl C, et al. High rate of benign histology in radiologically suspect renal lesions. Dan Med J. 2014;61:A4932.
  • Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol. 2010;58:398–406.
  • Marconi L, Dabestani S, Lam TB, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous renal tumour biopsy. Eur Urol. 2016;69:660–673.
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.
  • Wood BJ, Khan MA, McGovern F, et al. Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management. J Urol. 1999;161:1470–1474.
  • Murphy WM, Zambroni BR, Emerson LD, et al. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Simultaneous collection of cytologic and histologic specimens. Cancer. 1985;56:200–205.
  • Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR, et al. Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol. 2007;178:379–386.
  • Nisen H, Järvinen P, Fovaeus M, et al. Contemporary treatment of renal tumors: a questionnaire survey in the Nordic countries (the NORENCA-I study). Scand J Urol. 2017;51:360–366.
  • Azawi NH, Tolouee SA, Madsen M, et al. Core needle biopsy clarify the histology of the small renal masses and may prevent overtreatment. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50:1205–1209.
  • Remzi M, Marberger M. Renal tumor biopsies for evaluation of small renal tumors: why, in whom, and how?. Eur Urol. 2009;55:359–367.
  • Leveridge MJ, Finelli A, Kachura JR, et al. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy. Eur Urol. 2011;60:578–584.
  • Whittier WL, Korbet SM. Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:142–147.
  • Roccatello D, Sciascia S, Rossi D, et al. Outpatient percutaneous native renal biopsy: safety profile in a large monocentric cohort. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015243.
  • Beisland C, Johannesen TB, Reisaeter LAR, et al. Real-life use of diagnostic biopsies before treatment of kidney cancer: results from a Norwegian population-based study. Scand J Urol. 2018;52:38–44.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.