References
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
- Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering T, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):418–430.
- Kim PH, Pinheiro LC, Atoria CL, et al. Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis. J Urol. 2013;189(2):602–608.
- Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50(6):854–857.
- Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1643–1649.
- Anastasiadis A, Salomon L, Katz R, et al. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology. 2003;62(2):292–297.
- Wimpissinger T, Tschabitscher M, Feichtinger H, et al. Surgical anatomy of the puboprostatic complex with special reference to radical perineal prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2003;92(7):681–684.
- Jacobsen NE, Moore KN, Estey E, et al. Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of postoperative urinary incontinence rates. J Urol. 2007;177(2):615–619.
- Stolzenburg J, Liatsikos E, Rabenalt R, et al. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol. 2006;49(1):103–111.
- Asimakopoulos A, Annino F, D' Orazio A, et al. Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol. 2010;58(3):407–417.
- Van Velthoven R, Ahlering T, Peltier A, et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. Urology. 2003;61(4):699–702.
- Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G, et al. Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol. 2012;61(3):541–548.
- Young H. The cure of cancer of the prostate by radical perineal prostatectomy (prostate-seminal vesiculectomy) history, literature and statistics of Young’s operation. J Urol. 1945;53(1):188–256.
- Steiner M. The puboprostatic ligament and the male urethral suspensory mechanism: an anatomic study. Urology. 1994;44(4):530–534.
- Poore R, McCullough D, Jarow J. Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 1998;51(1):67–72.
- Kaggwa S, Galukande M. Urinary continence outcomes after puboprostatic ligament preserving open retropubic radical prostatectomy at a Sub-Saharan hospital. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:986382.
- Mandel P, Graefen M, Michl U, et al. The effect of age on functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:203–208.