Intrarenal pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a porcine kidney model

References

• Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol. 2010;12(2–3):e86-96–e96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curhan GC. Epidemiology of stone disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):287–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rukin NJ, Siddiqui ZA, Chedgy ECP, et al. Trends in upper tract stone disease in England: evidence from the hospital episodes statistics database. Urol Int. 2017;98(4):391–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid AO, Fakhralddin SS. Risk factors for fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Asian J Urol. 2016;3(2):82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grosso AA, Sessa F, Campi R, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications after ureteroscopy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(3):309–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevzner M, Stisser BC, Luskin J, et al. Alternative management of complex renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43(3):631–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseynov M, et al. Clinical comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser and High-Power holmium laser for ureteral stone management. J Endourol. 2021;35(6):795–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsyouf M, Abourbih S, West B, et al. Elevated renal pelvic pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy risk higher postoperative pain and longer hospital stay. J Urol. 2018;199(1):193–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Hua LX, Zhang JZ, et al. Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017;33(1):36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L, et al. Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol. 2016;30(1):49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalb DM, Eshghi M, David Ian M, et al. Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: an experimental study. J Urol. 1993;149(6):1576–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokas T, Skolarikos A, Herrmann TRW, et al. Pressure matters 2: intrarenal pressure ranges during upper-tract endourological procedures. World J Urol. 2019;37(1):133–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokas T, Tzanaki E, Nagele U, et al. Role of intrarenal pressure in modern day endourology (Mini-PCNL and flexible URS): a systematic review of literature. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(10):52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepeler A, Akman T, Silay MS, et al. Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(3):275–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsmadi J, Fan J, Zhu W, et al. The influence of Super-Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. J Endourol. 2018;32(9):819–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai D, Chen M, Sheng M, et al. Use of a novel vacuum-assisted access sheath in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a feasibility study. J Endourol. 2020;34(3):339–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanetti SP, Lievore E, Fontana M, et al. Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a new perspective in fragments clearance and intrarenal pressure control. World J Urol. 2021;39(6):1717–1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong W, Wen J, Peng L, et al. Enhanced super-mini-PCNL (eSMP): low renal pelvic pressure and high stone removal efficiency in a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Urol. 2021;39(3):929–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright A, Williams K, Somani B, et al. Intrarenal pressure and irrigation flow with commonly used ureteric access sheaths and instruments. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(4):434–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perez-Fentes DA, Gude F, Blanco M, et al. Predictive analysis of factors associated with percutaneous stone surgery outcomes. Can J Urol. 2013;20(6):7050–7059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Song L, Xie D, et al. The new generation Mini-PCNL System – monitoring and controlling of renal pelvic pressure by suctioning device for efficient and safe PCNL in managing renal staghorn calculi. Urol Int. 2016;97(1):61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Bostanci Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a single-center experience. Urology. 2012;79(5):990–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo HQ, Shi HL, Li XG, et al. Relationship between the intrapelvic perfusion pressure in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and postoperative recovery. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008;46(1):52–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rawandale-Patil AV, Ganpule AP, Patni LG. Development of an innovative intrarenal pressure regulation system for mini-PCNL: a preliminary study. Indian J Urol. 2019;35(3):197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes ACN, Dall'Aqua V, Carrera RV, et al. Intra-renal pressure and temperature during ureteroscopy: does it matter? Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47(2):436–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, et al. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):33–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar