3D laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of multicentre study  

References

• Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. J Urol. 1994;152(5 Pt 2):1831–1836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barré C. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52(1):71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50(6):854–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg J, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 2000 cases. J Endourol. 2008;22(10):2319–2326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):648–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson AE, Carlsson S, Laven BA, et al. Karolinska prostatectomy: a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(6):453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1057–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, et al. Health economic analysis of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for prostate cancer within the prospective multicentre LAPPRO trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):816–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andras I, Crisan N, Gavrilita M, et al. Every setback is a setup for a comeback: 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after robotic radical prostatectomy. J Balkan Union Oncol. 2017;22:87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bove P, Iacovelli V, Celestino F, et al. 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: a single cohort study. BMC Urol. 2015;15:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirie NI, Wang Q, Wang S. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopic systems in urology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2018;32(9):781–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, et al. The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol. 2002;20(1):48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280(11):969–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology. 2003;61(4):699–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riikonen J, Kaipia A, Petas A, et al. Initiation of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies in Finland: impact on centralization and quality of care. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(3):149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol. 2010;184(6):2291–2296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg J, Holze S, Neuhaus P, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from the first multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded controlled trial in radical prostatectomy (LAP-01). Eur Urol. 2021;79(6):750–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aykan S, Singhal P, Nguyen DP, et al. Perioperative, pathologic, and early continence outcomes comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional display systems for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy – a retrospective, single-surgeon study. J. Endourol. 2014;28(5):539–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita H, Nakagawa K, Usui Y, et al. High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(8):2203–2209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):431–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, et al. Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2010;58(6):838–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol. 2008;22(10):2299–2306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, LAPPRO steering committee, et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):216–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapiainen H, Murtola TJ, Raitanen M. 3D laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective single-surgeon learning curve in the first 200 cases with oncologic and functional results. Scand J Urol. 2021;55(3):242–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cathcart P, Sridhara A, Ramachandran N, et al. Achieving quality assurance of prostate cancer surgery during reorganisation of cancer services. Eur Urol. 2015;68(1):22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar