Problems of Biodiversity Conservation in Polish Agriculture

REFERENCES

• Agri-Environment Measures. 2005. Overview on general principles, types of measures and application. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/agrienv/rep_en.pdf (accessed March 4, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P. S., H. Vejre, T. Dalgaard, and J. Brandt. 2013. An indicator-based method for quantifying farm multifunctionality. Environmental Indicators 25:166–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaszak, J. 1997. Local changes in the population of wild bees. Nature Conservation 54:119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, T. G., J. A. Vickery, and J. D. Wilson. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:182–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biodiversity in agriculture. 2010. http://www.copa-cogeca.be/img/user/file/3236_P.pdf (accessed March 2, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bołtromiuk, A. 2012. Natura 2000—The opportunities and dilemmas of rural development within the European ecological network. Problems of Sustainable Development 7:117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Christen, B., and T. Dalgaard. 2013. Buffers for biomass production in temperate European agriculture: A review and synthesis on function, ecosystem services and implementation. Biomass and Bioenergy 55:53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defrancesco, E., P. Gatto, F. Runge, and S. Trestini. 2008. Factors affecting farmers’ participation in agrienvironmental measures: A Northern Italian Perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics 59:114–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, P. F., and A. D. Evans. 2006. Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri-environment schemes. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm, P., K. Granlund, P. Kappila, S. Mitikka, J. Niemi, K. Rankinen, A. Räike, and J. Räsänen. 2007. Influence of EU policy on agricultural nutrient losses and the state of receiving surface waters in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science 4:282–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, W., U. Schulz, and M. Rädle. 1994. Use of the Tübingen mix for bee pasture in Germany. In Forage for bees in an agricultural landscape, ed. A. Matheson, 57–65. Cardiff, UK: International Bee Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The CAP towards 2020. Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., and D. B. Lindenmayer. 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, G., and E. Villa. 2003. Analysis of the cultural value of livestock breeds: A methodology. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 120:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haczek, B. 2010. Ecosystem services within the framework of the convention on biological diversity. Economics and Environment 1:78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, A., I. Hanski, and M. Pärtel. 2006. Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecology Letters 9:72–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. D. 2002. Landscape structure, habitat fragmentation, and the ecology of insects. Agriculture and Forest Entomology 4:159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallas, Z., J. A. Gomez-Limon, and M. Arriaza. 2007. Are citizens willing to pay for agricultural multifunctionality? Agricultural Economics 36:307–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn, D., R. A. Baquero, Y. Clough, M. Diaz, J. De Estaban, F. Fernandez, D. Gabriel, F. Herzog, et al. 2006. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agrienvironment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters 9:243–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn, D., and W. J. Southerland. 2003. How effective are agri-environment schemes in conserving biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology 40:947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal, F. B. 2011. Human behavior and biodiversity loss: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 21:601–605.
   Google Scholar
• Melman, T. C. P., A. G. M. Schotman, S. Hutnik, and G. R. de Snoo. 2008. Evaluation of meadow bird management, especially black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa L.), in the Netherlands. Journal of Nature Conservation 16:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. www.maweb.org/en/index.aspx (accessed February 6, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. 2008. Merit goods. In The New Palgrave dictionary of economics, eds. S. N. Durlauf and L. E. Blume, 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan. [The New Palgrave dictionary of economics online]. www.dictionaryofeconomics.com (accessed February 25, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, S. L., and M. E. Gilpin. 1989. Theoretical issues in conservation biology. In Perspectives in ecological theory, ed. J. Roughgarden, 287–305. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, M., P. Rocha, and F. Moreira. 2005. Long-term trends in great bustard (Otis tarda) populations in Portugal suggest concentration in single high quality area. Biological Conservation 124:415–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Report on the implementation of the Rural Development Programme for 2007–2013. 2011. Report for 2011 No 5/2011. www.minrol.gov.pl (accessed February 23, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sahrbacher, A., K. Happe, S. Uthes, C. Sattler, T. Dalgaard, and N. Hutchings. 2009. Analyzing exemplary policy issues using the MEA-scope framework. In Rural landscapes and agricultural policies in Europe, eds. A. Piorr and K. Müller, 191–206. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Slootweg, R. 2005. Biodiversity assessment framework: making biodiversity part of corporate social responsibility. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23:37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Smallshire, D., P. Robertson, and P. Thompson. 2004. Policy into practice: the development and delivery of agri-environment schemes and supporting advice in England. Ibis 146(Suppl. 2):250–258.
   Google Scholar
• Stoate, C., A. Baldi, P. Beja, N. D. Boatman, I. Herzon, A. van Doorn, G. R. de Snoo, L. Rakosy, et al. 2009. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe—A review. Journal of Environmental Management 91:22–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryjanowski, P., Z. Dajdok, K. Kujawa, T. Kałuski, and M. Mrówczyński. 2011. Threats to biodiversity in farmland: Are results from Western Europe good solutions for Poland? Polish Journal of Agronomy 7:113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Uthes, S., A. Piorr, P. Zander, A. Kedziorac, F. Ungaro, T. Dalgaard, C. Kjeldsen, M. Stolze, et al. 2011. Regional impacts of abolishing direct payments: an integrated analysis in four European regions. Agricultural Systems 104(2):110–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittingham, M. J., J. S. Krebs, R. D. Swetnam, J. A. Vickery, J. D. Wilson, and R. P. Freckleton. 2007. Should conservation strategies consider spatial generality? Farmland Birds show regional not national patterns of habitat association. Ecology Letters 10:25–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1988: Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=989
   Google Scholar