Baby Corn-Legumes Intercropping Systems: I. Yields, Resource Utilization Efficiency, and Soil Health

REFERENCES

• Alef, K. 1995. Estimation of soil respiration. In Methods in applied microbiology and biochemistry, eds. K. Alef and P. Nannipieri, 464–470. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banik, P. 1996. Evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row-replacement series system. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 176:289–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banik, P., and R. C. Sharma. 2009. Yield and resource utilization efficiency in baby corn-legume intercropping system in eastern plateau of India. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 33:379–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, S. A. 1995. Soil nutrient bioavailability: A mechanistic approach, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bedoussac, L., and E. Justes. 2010. Dynamic analysis of competition and complementarity for light and N use to understand the yield and the protein content of a durum wheat–winter pea intercrop. Plant and Soil 330:37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benincasa, P., R. Pace, G. Tosti, and F. Tei. 2012. Early interspecific interference in the wheat/faba bean (Triticum aestivum/Vicia faba ssp. minor) and rapeseed/squarrosum clover (Brassica napus var. oleifera/Trifolium squarrosum) intercrops. Italian Journal of Agronomy 7:171–177.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, L., and F. Böhme. 2006. Soil microbiological and biochemical properties affected by plant growth and different long-term fertilization. European Journal of Soil Biology 42:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. F., and R. M. Shibles. 1985. An analysis of competition between intercropped cowpea and maize. 1. Soil N and P levels and their relationship with dry matter and seed productivity. Field Crop Research 12:133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit, C. T. 1960. On competition. Verslag Landbouwkundige Onderzoek 66:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, C. A. 1990. Potential of multiple cropping systems. In Agroecology and small farm development, eds. M. A. Altieri and S. B. Hecht, 137–150. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, K. A., and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedure for agricultural research. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hanway, J. J., and H. Heidel. 1952. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa Agriculture 27:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., M. Natarajan, and R. W. Willey. 1987. Physiological basis for yield advantages in sorghum groundnut intercropping exposed to drought. 1. Dry matter production, yield and light interception. Field Crop Research 17:259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., M. Gooding, P. Ambus, G. Corre-Hellou, Y. Crozat, C. Dahlmann, A. Dibet, P. von Fragstein, et al. 2009. Pea-barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Research 113:64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwith, B. 1985. A role for intercropping in modern agriculture. Bio Science 35:286–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India.
   Google Scholar
• Joergensen, R. G. 1995. Microbial biomass. In Methods in applied microbiology and biochemistry, eds. K. Alef and P. Nannipieri, 382–386. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. M., L. Li, F. S. Zhang, and C. Tang. 2004. Acid phosphatase role in chickpea/maize intercropping. Annals of Botany 94:297–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., and R. W. Willey. 1983. Radiation interception and growth in an intercrop of pearl millet groundnut. Field Crop Research 7:141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGilchrist, C. A. 1965. Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics 21:975–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofori, F., and W. R. Stern. 1987. Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41:41–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. R., C. V. Cole, F. S. Watanabe, and L. A. Dean. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular No. 939. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Omay, A., C. Rice, L. Maddux, and W. Gordon. 1997. Changes in soil microbial and chemical properties under long-term crop rotation and fertilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61:1672–1678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, R.S. 1977. Plant root systems: Their function and interaction with soil. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R. C., and P. Banik. 2013. Baby corn-legumes intercropping system: II. Weed dynamics and community structure. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 67:11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shennan, C. 2008. Biotic interactions, ecological knowledge and agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Science 363:717–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbiah, B. V., and G. L. Asija. 1956. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Current Science 25:259–260.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai, M. A., and J. M. Bremner. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1:301–307.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai, M. A., and J. M. Bremner. 1972. Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 4:479–487.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. W. 1982. Exchangeable cations. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties, eds. A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney, 159–166. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
   Google Scholar
• Tosti, G., and M. Guiducci. 2010. Durum wheat-faba bean temporary intercropping: Effects on nitrogen supply and wheat quality. European Journal of Agronomy 33:157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosti, G., and K. Thorup-Kristensen. 2010. Using coloured roots to study root interaction and competition in intercropped legumes and nonlegumes. Journal of Plant Ecology 3:191–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosti, G., P. Benincasa and M. Guiducci. 2010. Competition and facilitation in hairy vetch-barley intercrops. Italian Journal of Agronomy 5:239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Trenbath, B. R. 2009. Plant interactions in mixed crop communities. In Multiple cropping, eds. P. A. Papendick, P. A. Sanchez, and G. B. Triplett, 129. ASA Special Publication No. 27, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Walkley, A., and I. A. Black. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil, R., and M. E. McFadden. 1991. Fertility and weed stress effects on performance of maize/soybean intercrop. Agronomy Journal 83:717–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willey, R. W. 1979. Intercropping its importance and research needs-I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, R. W., and M. R. Rao. 1980. A competitive ratio for qualifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture 16:117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F. S., and L. Li. 2003. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil 248:305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar