The Coffee Crisis, Fair Trade, and Agroecological Transformation: Impacts on Land-Use Change in Costa Rica

REFERENCES

• Babin, N. L. 2012. Agrarian change, agroecological transformation and the coffee crisis in Costa Rica. PhD dissertation, University of California at Santa Cruz.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, C. 2005. Confronting the coffee crisis: Can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmers vulnerability in northern Nicaragua? World Development 33:497 –511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, C., V. E. Méndez, and J. A. Fox. 2008. Paradox and potential for sustainable coffee. In Confronting the coffee crisis: Sustaining livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America, eds. C. Bacon, V. E. Méndez, S. Gliessman, D. Goodman, and J. Fox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, C. M., W. A. Sundstrom, M. E. Flores Gómez, V. E. Méndez, R. Santos, B. Goldoftas, and I. Dougherty. 2014. Explaining the “hungry farmer paradox”: Smallholders and fair trade cooperatives navigate seasonality and change in Nicaragua’s corn and coffee markets. Global Environmental Change 25:133 –149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, W. 2009. The food wars. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselmann, A. S. 2012. Mediating factors of land use change among coffee farmers in a biological corridor. Ecological Economics 80:79 –88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., and J. Stanley. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Investigación del Café (CICAFE). 2005. Estructura de Costos de Producción Agrícola de Café, Nacional: Valores Promedio de Estudio de Campo. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Investigación del Café (CICAFE). 2006. Estructura de Costos de Producción Agrícola de Café, Nacional: Valores Promedio de Estudio de Campo. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Investigación del Café (CICAFE). 2007. Estructura de Costos de Producción Agrícola de Café, Nacional: Valores Promedio de Estudio de Campo. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Investigación del Café (CICAFE). 2008. Estructura de Costos de Producción Agrícola de Café, Nacional: Valores Promedio de Estudio de Campo. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Investigación del Café (CICAFE). 2009. Estructura de Costos de Producción Agrícola de Café, Nacional: Valores Promedio de Estudio de Campo. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Cole-Christensen, D. 1997. A place in the rainforest: Settling the Costa Rican frontier. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, R. K. 2009. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2. User’s guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates
   Google Scholar
• CoopePueblos. 2005. Informe De La Asamblea General Asociados De Coopepueblos, Informe De Gerencia. Agua Buena, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• CoopePueblos. 2006. Informe De La Asamblea General Asociados De Coopepueblos, Informe De Gerencia. Agua Buena, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• CoopePueblos. 2007. Informe De La Asamblea General Asociados De Coopepueblos, Informe De Gerencia. Agua Buena, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• CoopePueblos. 2008. Informe De La Asamblea General Asociados De Coopepueblos, Informe De Gerencia. Agua Buena, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• CoopePueblos. 2009. Informe De La Asamblea General Asociados De Coopepueblos, Informe De Gerencia. Agua Buena, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Dossa, E. L., E. C. M. Fernandes, W. S. Reid, and E. Ezui. 2008. Above- and belowground biomass, nutrient and carbon stocks contrasting an open-grown and a shaded coffee plantation. Agroforestry Systems 72:103 –115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. 2005. Sustainable adaptation: Confrontingthe coffee crisis using sustainable agriculture practices in Agua Buena, Costa Rica. M.S. Thesis. University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. F., and N. Babin. 2006. Una comunidad cafetalera en transicion: estudio de caso en Agua Buena de Coto Brus, Costa Rica. Paper presented at Crisis y Transformaciones en el Mundo del Cafe, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia.
   Google Scholar
• Gitay, H., and I. R. Noble. 1997. What are functional types and how should we seek them? In Plant functional types: Their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change, eds. T. M. Smith, H. H. Shugart, and F. I. Woodward, 3 –19. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. R. 2007. Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2008. Agroecological foundations for designing sustainable coffee agroecosystems. In Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America, eds. C. Bacon, V. E. Méndez, S. Gliessman, D. Goodman, and J. A. Fox, 27 –41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli, N. J., and R. K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4:379 –391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Gimenez, E. 2002. Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua: A case study in participatory, sustainable land management impact monitoring. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93:87 –105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Gimenez, E., and R. Patel (with A. Shattuck). 2009. Food rebellions: Crisis and the hunger for justice. Oakland, CA: Food First.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, D. U., and P. M. Vitousek. 1998. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecological Monographs 68:121 –149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. 2005. Precio de Liquidacion Final. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. 2006. Precio de Liquidacion Final. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. 2007. Precio de Liquidacion Final. San Jose,Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. 2008. Precio de Liquidacion Final. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. 2009. Precio de Liquidacion Final. San Jose, Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. 2010. Informe de la actividad cafetalera de Costa Rica: 2009. San Jose: Instituto del Café de Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. 2013. Área Cafetalera 2012 por región. http://www.icafe.go.cr/sector_cafetalero/SIG/area_cafetalera_2012_region.html (accesed October 1, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censo. 2000. IX Censo Nacional de Poblacion. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censo.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censo. 2011. X Censo Nacional de Población y VI de Vivienda. San Jose, Costa Rica, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censo.
   Google Scholar
• International Coffee Organization. 2011. Statistics. London: International Coffee Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, S., C. M. Bacon, S. M. Philpott, V. E. Méndez, P. Läderach, and R. A. Rice. 2014. Shade coffee: Update on a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience 64:416 –428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., and D. Runsten. 2006. Does fair trade coffee have a future in Mexico? The impact of migration in a Oaxacan community. XXVI International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Luetchford, P. 2008. Fair trade and a global commodity. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavorel, S., S. McIntyre, J. Landsberg, and T. D. A. Forbes. 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:474 –478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manger, W. F. 1992. Colonization on the southern frontier of Costa Rica: A historical-cultural landscape. M.S. thesis. Department of Geography, Memphis State University.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2004. Global development and the corporate food regime. Symposium on New Directions in the Sociology of Global Development. XI World Congress of Rural Sociology, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., C. M. Bacon, S. Petchers, D. Herrador, C. Carranza, L. Trujillo, and A. Mendoza. 2006. Sustainable coffee from the bottom up Impacts of certification initiatives on small-scale farmer households of Central America and Mexico. Boston: Oxfam America.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., S. R. Gliessman and G. S. Gilbert. 2007. Tree biodiversity in farmer cooperatives of a shade coffee landscape in western El Salvador. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 119:145 –159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., C. M. Bacon, M. Olson, S. Petchers, D. Herrador, C. Carranza, L. Trujillo, C. Guadarrama-Zugasti, et al. 2010. Effects of fair trade and organic certifications on small-scale coffee farmer households in Central America and Mexico. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25:236 –251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., C. M. Bacon, M. Olson, K. S. Morris, and A. Shattuck. 2010. Agrobiodiversity and shade coffee smallholder livelihoods: A review and synthesis of ten years of research in Central America. The Professional Geographer 62:357 –376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería. 2002. Manual para Inspectores en Cafe Sostenible. San Jose, Costa Rica: MAG.
   Google Scholar
• Naeem, S. 1998. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conservation Biology 12:39 –45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obando Jimenez, J. J. 2004. El cafe sostenible. ICafe Boletin Informativo. San Jose: ICAFE.
   Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., R. A. Rice, R. Greenberg, and M. E. van der Voort. 1996. Shade coffee: A disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience 46:598 –608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte, S. 2002. The “latte revolution”? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Development 30:1099 –1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickert, E. 2005. Environmental effects of the coffee crisis: A case study of land use and avian communities in Agua Buena, Costa Rica. M.S. thesis, Department of Environmental Studies. Olympia, WA, The Evergreen State College.
   Google Scholar
• Ronchi, L. 2002. The impact of fair trade on producers and their organizations: A case study with COOCOAFE in Costa Rica. Poverty Research Unit at Sussex, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Samper, M. 2010. Costa Rica’s response to the coffee crisis. Latin American Perspectives 37(72):72 –92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sick, D. 2008. Coffee, farming families, and fair trade in Costa Rica: New markets, same old problems? Latin American Research Review 43(3):193 –208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto-Pinto, L., Anzueto, M., Mendoza, J., Ferrer, G. J., and de Jong, B. 2010. Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforestry Systems, 78(1):39 –51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symstad, A. J. 2000. A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility. Ecology 81:99 –109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Team, R. D. C. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Terborgh, J., and van Schaik, C. 2002. Making parks work: Strategies for preserving tropical nature. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Ploeg, J. D. 2010. The peasantries of the twenty-first century: The commoditization debate revisited. Journal of Peasant Studies 37:1 –30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varangis, P., P. Siegel, D. Giovannucci, and B. Lewin. 2003. Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Vitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277(5325):494 –499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, S. M. (2008). Coffee agroforestry in the aftermath of modernization: Diversified production and livelihood strategies in post-reform Nicaragua. In Confronting the coffee crisis: Sustaining livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America, eds. C. Bacon, V. E. Méndez, S. Gliessman, D. Goodman, and J. Fox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. World development indicators and global development finance. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar