The role of consumers in agrobiodiversity conservation: the case of traditional varieties of apples in Portugal

References

• Anstine, J. 2000. Consumer’s willingness to pay for recycled content in plastic kitchen garbage bags: A hedonic price approach. Applied Economic Letters 74:35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F., T. Larsen, M. Smith, G. Sogn-Grundvåg, and J. Young. 2015. Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity. Food Policy 53:82–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogh, P., D. Békési, M. Gorton, J. Popp, and P. Lengyel. 2016. Consumer willingness to pay for traditional food products. Food Policy 61:176–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Fourth ed. Chichester: UK; John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bangcuyo, R., K. Smith, J. Zumach, A. Pierce, G. Guttman, and C. Simons. 2015. The use of immersive technologies to improve consumer testing: The role of ecological validity, context and engagement in evaluating coffee. Food Quality and Preference 41:84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlagne, C., P. Bazoche, A. Thomas, H. Ozier-Lafontaine, F. Causeret, and J. Blazy. 2015. Promoting local foods in small island states: The role of information policies. Food Policy 57:62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G., M. DeGroot, and J. Marschak. 1964. Measuring utility by a single response sequential method. Behavioural Science 9:226–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellon, M. 1996. The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: A conceptual framework at the farmer level. Economic Botany 50 (1):26–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaletti, S., and M. Nardella. 2000. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh fruit and vegetables in Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3:297–310.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, M., and T. Schroeder. 2002. Marginal value of quality attributes for natural and organic beef. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34:39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Botelho, A., I. Dinis, L. Lourenço-Gomes, L. Costa Pinto, and O. Simões. 2017. The effect of sequential information on consumers’ willingness to pay for credence food attributes. Appetite 118:17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugarolas, M., and J. Ruiz. 2009. A competitive strategy for vegetable products : Traditional varieties. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7 (2):294–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canavari, M., G. Nocella, and R. Scarpa. 2005. Stated willingness-to-pay for organic fruit and pesticide ban. Journal of Food Products Marketing 11 (3):107–34.
   Google Scholar
• Carew, R., and W. Florkowski. 2010. The importance of geographic wine appellations: Hedonic pricing of burgundy wines in the British Columbia wine market. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 58 (1):93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combris, P., E. Giraud-Héraud, P. Bazoche, C. Hannus, A. Pinto, M. Berjano, and R. Maia. 2012. Consumers’ willingness to pay for reduced pesticide use in the production of fresh and processed apples. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 94:425–31.
   Google Scholar
• Combris, P., A. Pinto, A. Fragata, and E. Giraud-Héraud. 2009. Does taste beat food safety? evidence from the “Pêra Rocha” case in Portugal. Journal of Food Products Marketing 16 (1):60–78.
   Google Scholar
• Costanigro, M., S. Kroll, and G. Nurse. 2011. An in-store valuation of local and organic apples: The role of social desirability. Agribusiness 27 (4):465–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czembrowski, P., and J. Kronenberg. 2016. Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 146:11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groote, H., S. Kimenju, and U. Morawetz. 2011. Estimating consumer willingness to pay for food quality with experimental auctions: The case of yellow versus fortified maize meal in Kenya. Agricultural Economics 42:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denver, S., and J. Jensen. 2014. Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples. Food Quality and Preference 31:129–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickes, L., and E. Crouch. 2015. The Impact of Changing Lake Levels on Property Values. Review of Regional Studies 45 (3):221–35.
   Google Scholar
• Dinis, I., O. Simoes, and J. Moreira. 2011. Using sensory experiments to determine consumers’ willingness to pay for traditional apple varieties. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9 (2):351–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drescher, L., S. Thiele, and C. Weiss. 2008. The taste for variety: A hedonic analysis. Economics Letters 101 (1):66–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2010. Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Communication from the. COM(2010) 2020 final. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed March 10, 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/genetic-resources/pdf/com-2013-838_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2013. Agricultural genetic resources - from conservation to sustainable use. report from the commission to the European parliament, the council and the European economic and social committee. COM(2013) 838 final, Brussels: European Commission. (Accessed March 10, 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Enneking, U. 2004. Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: The case of the QandS label. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31 (2):205–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, E., and V. Smith. 1996. Price, quality, and pesticide related health risk considerations in fruit and vegetable purchases: An hedonic analysis of Tucson, Arizona supermarkets. Journal of Food Distribution Research October 1996:59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, J., S. Jaeger, and F. Harker. 2006. Preferences in pear appearance and response to novelty among Australian and New Zealand consumers. Postharvest Biology and Technology 41 (1):38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulseven, O., and M. Wohlgenant. 2014. Demand for functional and nutritional enhancements in specialty milk products. Appetite 81:284–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L., S. Jaeger, R. Brodie, and A. Balemi. 2007. The influence of involvement on purchase intention for new world wine. Food Quality and Preference 18:1033–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. 2014. Analysis of Panel Data, Third ed. New York; Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C., and B.-H. Lin. 2007. A hedonic analysis of fresh tomato prices among regional markets. Review of Agricultural Economics 29 (4):783–800.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, J., S. Shewfelts, S. Prusia, and W. Hurst. 1985. Estimating implicit marginal process of quality characteristics of tomatoes. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 17:139–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowska, K., M. Jeruszka, I. Matuszewska, W. Roszkowski, N. Barylko-Pikielna, and A. Brzozowska. 2003. Hedonic tests in different locations as predictors of apple juice consumption at home in elderly and young subjects. Food Quality and Preference 14 (8):653–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74 (2):132–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohéac, Y., and S. Issanchou. 2007. Using auctions to estimate prices and value of food products. In Consumer-led food product development, ed. H. Macfie, 471–91. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Loose, S., and G. Szolnoki. 2012. Market price differentials for food packaging characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 25 (2):171–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, M., and J. McCluskey. 2002. Assessing consumers response to protected geographical identification labeling. Agribusiness 16:309–20.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, M., and W. Umberger. 2007. A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy 32 (4):496–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J., and J. Fox. 2001. In-store valuation of steak tenderness. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 (3):539–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, M., A. Arvola, U. Hursti, L. Alberg, and P. Sjödén. 2001. Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. British Food Journal 103:209–27.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, K., N. Owens, and N. Simon. 2004. The price premium for organic babyfood: A hedonic analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29:132–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marette, S., J. Roosen, S. Blanchemanche, and E. Feinblatt-Mélèze. 2010. Functional food, uncertainty and consumers‟ choices: A lab experiment with enriched yoghurts for lowering cholesterol. Food Policy 35 (5):419–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachren, M., and G. Warnaby. 2004. Retail “Quality Assurance” labels as a strategic marketing communication mechanism for fresh meat. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 142:255–71.
   Google Scholar
• Mcfadden, J., and W. Huffman. 2017. Willingness-to-pay for natural, organic, and conventional foods: The effects of information and meaningful labels. Food Policy 68:214–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noussair, C., S. Robin, and B. Ruffieux. 2004. Revealing consumers’ willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction. Journal of Economic Psychology 256:725–41.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. ISCED 2011 Operational Manual: Guidelines for classifying national education programes and related qualifications. OECD, European Union, UNESCO. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/international-standard-classification-of-education.aspx pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Palma, M., A. Collart, and C. Chammoun. 2015. Information asymmetry in consumer perceptions of quality-differentiated food products. Journal of Consumer Affairs Fall 49 (3):596–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmquist, R. 1984. Estimating the demand of characteristics of housing. Review of Economics and Statistics 64:394–404.
   Google Scholar
• Panzone, L., and O. Simões. 2009. The importance of regional and local origin in the choice of wine: Hedonic models of portuguese wines in Portugal. Journal of Wine Research 201:27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, A., A. Fragata, P. Combris, and E. Giraud-Héraud. 2008. Consentimento a pagar dos consumidores pelos atributos de qualidade da Pêra Rocha: Metodologia dos mercados experimentais. In Variedades regionais e agricultura biológica: Desafios para peras e maçãs portuguesas, coords. O. Simões, A. Lopes, and J. Ferreira, 155–65. Coimbra, Portugal: ESAC/DRAPC [In Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Poole, N., L. Martínez, and F. Giménez. 2007. Quality perceptions under evolving information conditions: Implications for diet, health and consumer satisfaction. Food Policy 32:175–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouta, E., J. Heikkilä, S. Forsman-Hugg, M. Isoniemi, and J. Mäkelä. 2010. Consumer choice of broiler meat: The effects of country of origin and production methods. Food Quality and Preference 215:539–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rocchi, L., L. Paolotti, C. Cortina, and A. Boggia. 2016. Conservation of landrace: The key role of the value for agrobiodiversity conservation. An application on ancient tomatoes varieties. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 8:307–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rødbotten, M., O. Tomic, A. Holtekjølen, S. Grini, P. Lea, B. Granli, S. Grimsby, and S. Sahlstrøm. 2015. Barley bread with normal and low content of salt; sensory profile and consumer preference in five European countries. Journal of Cereal Science 64:176–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotaris, L., and R. Danielis. 2011. Willingness to pay for fair trade coffee: A conjoint analysis experiment with Italian consumers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 91:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, H., and R. Haight. 2012. Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. Journal of Environmental Management 113:194–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppä, L., T. Latvala, F. Akaichi, J. Gil, and H. Tuorila. 2015. What are domestic apples worth? Hedonic responses and sensory information as drivers of willingness to pay. Food Quality and Preference 43:97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smale, M., and M. Bellon. 1999. A conceptual framework for valuing on-farm genetic resources. In Agrobiodiversity: Characterization, Utilization, and Management, eds D. Wood, and J. Lenné, 387–408. New York; CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A., and G. Blomquist. 2007. Ecolabeled paper towels: Consumer valuation and expenditure analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 901:314–20.
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, G., R. Scarpa, and A. Cavicchi. 2012. Exploring consumer’s preferences for farmed sea bream. Aquaculture International 204:673–91.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, B. 2004. Australian wines in the British wine market: A hedonic price analysis. Agribusiness 203:287–307.
   Google Scholar
• Tempesta, T., and D. Vecchiato. 2013. An analysis of the territorial factors affecting milk purchase in Italy. Food Quality and Preference 271:35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Teshome, A., B. Baum, L. Fahrig, J. Torrance, T. Arnason, and J. Lambert. 1997. Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor L. Moench] landrace variation and classification in north Shewa and south Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica 973:255–63.
   Google Scholar
• Teuber, R., and R. Herrmann. 2012. Towards a differentiated modeling of origin effects in hedonic analysis: An application to auction prices of specialty coffee. Food Policy 376:732–40.
   Google Scholar
• Troncoso, J., and M. Aguirre. 2007. Short communication. The influence of size, variety, destination port and month of sale in the export price of Chilean apples: A hedonic approach. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 51:25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, J., and P. Verhoef. 2011. Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing 283:167–80.
   Google Scholar
• Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16:8–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., and X. Huo. 2016. Willingness-to-pay price premiums for certified fruits: A case of fresh apples in China. Food Control 64:240–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Y. Mao, and F. Gale. 2008. Chinese consumer demand for food safety attributes in milk products. Food Policy 331:27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Winfree, J., and J. McCluskey. 2005. Collective Reputation and Quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 871:206–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., and R. Gallardo. 2010. Consumers’ Willingness to pay for treatment-induced quality attributes in Anjou pears. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 351:105–17.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Y. Wang, H. Chen, and B. Lu. 2003. Conserving traditional rice varieties through management for crop diversity. BioScience 53 (2):158–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar