Can the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin America

References

• Agamben, G. 2014. What is a destituent power? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (1):65–74. doi:10.1068/d3201tra.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri, M., and F. Funes-Monzote. 2012. The paradox of cuban agriculture. Monthly Review 63 (8):23–33. doi:10.14452/MR-063-08-2012-01_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri, M. A., and V. M. Toledo. 2011. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (3):587–612. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.582947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andermann, J. 2018. Turn of the tide? Cultural critique and the new right. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies 27 (1):1–3. doi:10.1080/13569325.2017.1420635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bähre, E., and F. Gomes. 2018. Humiliating the Brazilian poor: The iconoclasm of former president Lula. Anthropology Today 34 (5):10–15. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.12459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baschet, J. 2015. Adiós al capitalismo: Autonomía, sociedad del buen vivir y multiplicidad de mundos. Madrid: Ned ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Bello, W. 2017. Counterrevolution, the countryside and the middle classes: Lessons from five countries. Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1380628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. (1993 [1889]). Bernstein: The Preconditions of Socialism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boneti, L. W. 2006. Políticas públicas por dentro. São Geraldo: Editora Unijuí.
   Google Scholar
• Borón, A. 2014. América Latina en la geopolítica del imperialismo. Mexico: CEIICH.
   Google Scholar
• Borsatto, R. 2018. Brazilian experience in rural extension reform: challenges of a pluralistic and participatory policy addressing family farming. Unpublished manuscript, São Carlos.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M. L., and E. F. Freyre. 2010. Atando Cabos. La Agricultura Cubana: Contratiempos, Reajustes y Desafíos. Havana: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, M. J. 2018. Beginning to end hunger: Food and the environment in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and beyond. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 2003. Dominance and its dilemmas. Boston Review 28 (5). Accessed October 22, 2018. http://bostonreview.net/archives/BR28.5/chomsky.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccariello-Maher, G. 2014. Building the commune: Insurgent government, communal state. The South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (4):791–806. doi:10.1215/00382876-2803657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P. 2017. Neo‐developmentalism and a “vía campesina” for rural development: Unreconciled projects in Ecuador’s citizen’s revolution. Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2):348–64. doi:10.1111/joac.12203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLOC. 2015. Declaración Final del VI Congreso de la Coordinadora Latinoamericana de Organizaciones del Campo-La Vía Campesina. Argentina: Buenos Aires. Accessed October 22 2018. http://www.cloc-viacampesina.net/congresos/vi-congreso.
   Google Scholar
• Dada, C. July 6, 2018. Los enmascarados son de los dos bandos. El Faro, Accessed November 8, 2018 https://elfaro.net/es/201807/centroamerica/22202/“Los-enmascarados-son-de-los-dos-bandos”.htm
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2010. Latin America at a crossroads: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism or post-development? Cultural Studies 24 (1):1–65. doi:10.1080/09502380903424208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2018. Scaling up Agroecology Initiative: Transforming food and agricultural systems in support of the SDGs (A proposal prepared for the International Symposium on Agroecology, 3–5 April 2018), Accessed October 7, 2018. http://www.fao.org/3/I9049EN/i9049en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, M., J. Williams, G. Figueroa, G. G. Lovelace, M. Machado, L. Vasquez, L. Perez, L. Casimiro, G. Romero, and F. Funes-Aguilar. 2018. New opportunities, new challenges: Harnessing Cuba’s advances in agroecology and sustainable agriculture in the context of changing relations with the United States. Elementa Science of Anthropocene 6 (1):76. doi:10.1525/elementa.337.
   Google Scholar
• Freguin-Gresh, S. 2017. Agroecología y agricultura orgánica en Nicaragua. Génesis, institucionalización y desafíos. In Políticas públicas a favor de la agroecología en América Latina y El Caribe, ed. FAO,  Red PP-AL, 174–95. Brasilia: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• García-Linera, Á. 2012. Las tensiones creativas de la revolución: La quinta fase del Proceso de Cambio. La Paz: Presidencia de la Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional.
   Google Scholar
• Giraldo, O. F. 2019. Political ecology of agriculture. Agroecology and post-development. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11824-2.
   Google Scholar
• Giraldo, O. F., and P. M. Rosset. 2018. Agroecology as a territory in dispute: Between institutionality and social movements. The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (3):545–64. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1353496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2018. Scaling-out and scaling-up agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42 (8):841–42. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1481249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2011. Debates sobre el desarrollo y sus alternativas en América Latina: Una breve guía heterodoxa. In Más Allá del Desarrollo, ed. M. Lang and D. Mokrani, 21–53. Quito: Ediciones Abya Yala.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E. 2006. Campesino a campesino: Voices from Latin America’s farmer to farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Oakland: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• International Forum for Agroecology. 2015. Declaration of Nyéléni. Sélingué, Mali: International Forum for Agroecology, Nyéléni Centre.
   Google Scholar
• IPC (International Planning Committee for Food Sovereignty). April 52018. Intervention by Organizations of Small-Scale Food Producers and Civil Society at the II International Symposium on Agroecology. Rome. Accessed October 22, 2018. http://www.foodsovereignty.org/international-symposium-on-agroecology/
   Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 2008. Las disyuntivas de la izquierda en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. 2007. The shock doctrine. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Korybko, A. 2015. Hybrid wars: The indirect adaptive approach to regime change. Moscow: People’s Friendship University of Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., M. Pimbert, and G. Vanloqueren. 2014. Agroecological research: Conforming—Or transforming the dominant agro-food regime? Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38 (10):1127–55. doi:10.1080/21683565.2014.951459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddell Hart, B. H. 1991 [1954]. Strategy. London: Meridian.
   Google Scholar
• Luxemburg, R. (2006 [1900]). Reform or revolution and other writings. Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• LVC (La via Campesina). 2018. UN Human Rights Council passes a resolution adopting the peasant rights declaration in Geneva. Accessed October 28, 2018. https://viacampesina.org/en/un-human-rights-council-passes-a-resolution-adopting-the-peasant-rights-declaration-in-geneva/
   Google Scholar
• LVC (La Vía Campesina). 2009. Small scale sustainable farmers are cooling the earth. Jakarta: Views. Accessed October 15, 2018. https://viacampesina.net/downloads/PAPER5/EN/paper5-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Machín Sosa, B., A. M. Roque Jaime, D. R. Ávila Lozano, and P. M. Rosset. 2013. Agroecological revolution: The farmer-to-farmer movement of the ANAP in Cuba. Havana and Jakarta: ANAP and La Vía Campesina.
   Google Scholar
• Machin-Sosa, B., A. M. Roque Jaime, D. R. Avila-Lozano, and P. Rosset 2010. Revolución Agroecológica: el Movimiento deCampesino a Campesino de la ANAP en Cuba. ANAP, La Habana.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, N. 2017. Family, territory, nation: Post-neoliberal agroecological scaling in Nicaragua. Food Chain 6 (2):92–106. doi:10.3362/2046-1887.2016.008.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, B., R. Nehring, and M. Walsh-Dilley. 2014. The ‘state’of food sovereignty in Latin America: Political projects and alternative pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6):1175–200. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.964217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mier Y Terán, M., O. F. Giraldo, M. Aldasoro, H. Morales, B. Ferguson, P. Rosset, M. Khadse, and A. Campos. 2018. Bringing agroecology to scale: Key drivers and emblematic cases. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42 (6):637–65. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1443313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, F. September 4 2018. Don’t focus on regime change in Venezuela. Washington, D.C: Foreign Affairs. Accessed October 22, 2018. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/09/04/after-maduro-in-venezuela-regime-change/
   Google Scholar
• Negri, A. 1999. Insurgencies: constituent power and the modern state. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, C. I., and M. A. Altieri. 2018. Pathways for the amplification of agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42 (10):1170–93. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1499578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez-Soto, O. 2018. ¿Quién produce la riqueza en Nicaragua? Managua: CIPRES.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. R. 1998. Natural causes: Essays in ecological marxism. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the US Trade Representative. 2018. Resource Center, Western Hemisphere, Nicaragua. Accessed November 3, 2018. https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/americas/nicaragua
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, S. 2014. Scaling-up agroecological approaches: What, why and how? Belgium: Oxfam-Solidarity. https://www.oxfamsol.be/fr/scaling-agroecological-approacheswhatwhy-and-how.
   Google Scholar
• Patrouilleau, M. M., L. E. Martínez, E. Cittadini, and R. Cittadini. 2017. Políticas públicas y desarrollo de la agroecología en Argentina. In Políticas públicas a favor de la agroecología en América Latina y El Caribe, ed. FAO, Red PP-AL, 20–43. Brasilia: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro-Barbosa, L. March 18–21 2018. Dilemmas of peasant social movements faced with the dichotomy between progressive governments and the rise of the new right in Latin America: The case of Brazil. Working paper at Emancipatory Rural Politics Initiative: Authoritative Populism and the Rural World, The Hague. Accessed November 8 2018, https://www.iss.nl/sites/corporate/files/201803/ERPI%20CP%2026_Barbosa.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, T. F. 2017. The political economy of rentier capitalism and the limits to agrarian transformation in Venezuela. Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2):296–312. doi:10.1111/joac.v17.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riggirozzi, P., and D. Tussi. 2012. The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism in Latin America. In The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America, ed. P. Riggirozzi and D. Tussi, 1–16. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. 2006. Moving forward: Agrarian reform as a part of food sovereignty. In Promised land: competing visions of agrarian reform, ed. P. Rosset, R. Patel, and M. Courville, 301–321. Oakland: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. 2018 August 19. América Latina y la conciliación de clases. Mexico: La Jornada, Opinión.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and M. Benjamin. 1994. The greening of the revolution. Fort Lauderdale: Ocean Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and M. A. Altieri. 1997. Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture. Society & Natural Resources 10 (3):283–95. doi:10.1080/08941929709381027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and M. A. Altieri. 2017. Agroecology: Science and politics. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sabourin, E., M. M. Patrouilleau, J. Francois, L. Vásquez, and P. Niederle, ed. 2017. Políticas públicas a favor de la agroecología en América Latina y El Caribe Red PP-AL. Brasilia: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, S., and G. Mészáros. 2017. The political economy of land struggle in Brazil under workers’ party governments. Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2):397–414. doi:10.1111/joac.12206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C., P. Niederle, M. Ávila, E. Sabourin, P. Petersen, L. Silveira, W. Assis, J. Palm, and G. B. G. Fernandes. 2017. La experiencia brasileña de construcción de políticas públicas en favor de la Agroecología. In Políticas públicas a favor de la agroecología en América Latina y El Caribe, ed.FAO,  Red PP-AL, 44–69. Brasilia: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, W. Wolford, and B. White. 2018. Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism. The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1):1–20. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, G. 1994. From dictatorship to democracy. Boston: Albert Einstein Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. 2001. Ethics. Hertford, UK: Wordsworth Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Stédile, J. P. 2017. Necesitamos una nueva estrategia de disputa del poder politico. ALAI América en Movimiento. Accessed on October 15 2018. https://www.alainet.org/es/articulo/188764
   Google Scholar
• Steger, M. B. 2006. The quest for evolutionary socialism: Eduard bernstein and social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermann, C., and G. Félix. 2015. Agroecology as a vehicle for contributive justice. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (3):523–38. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9581-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandermeer, J., A. Aga, J. Allgeier, C. Badgley, R. Baucom, J. Blesh, L. Shapiro, A. Jones, L. Hoey, M. Jain, et al. 2018. Feeding prometheus: An interdisciplinary approach for solving the global food crisis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2:39. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2018.00039.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez, L. L., J. Marzin, and N. González. 2017. Políticas públicas y transición hacia la agricultura sostenible sobre bases agroecológicas en Cuba. In Políticas públicas a favor de la agroecología en América Latina y El Caribe, ed.FAO, Red PP-AL, 108–31. Brasilia: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. 2018. Resistance, class struggle and social movements in Latin America: Contemporary dynamics. The Journal of Peasant Studies 1–22. doi:10.1080/03066150.2018.1493458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara‐Camus, L., and C. Kay. 2017. Agribusiness, peasants, left‐wing governments, and the state in Latin America: An overview and theoretical reflections. Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2):239–57. doi:10.1111/joac.12215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, B. May 1st 2018. Laying the groundwork for insurrection: A closer look at the U.S. role in Nicaragua’s social unrest. Global Americans, Accessed October 15, 2018. https://theglobalamericans.org/2018/05/laying-groundwork-insurrection-closer-look-u-s-role-nicaraguas-social-unrest/
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J. R. 2017. Evo Morales, transformismo, and the consolidation of agrarian capitalism in Bolivia. Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2):330–47. doi:10.1111/joac.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wezel, A., S. Bellon, T. Doré, C. Francis, D. Vallod, and C. David. 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (4):503–15. doi:10.1051/agro/2009004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilpert, G. 2007. Changing Venezuela by taking power: The history and policies of the chavez government. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). 2014. The growth of soy: Impacts and solutions. Surrey, UK: Gland.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. 2005. Falta Petroleo! Perspectives on the emergence of a more ecological farming and food system in post-crisis Cuba. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar