The ‘inner’ dimension of Dutch farmers’ trajectories of change: drivers, triggers and turning points for sustained agroecological practices

References

• Altieri, M. A. 1998. Ecological impacts of industrial agriculture and the possibilities for truly sustainable farming. Monthly Review 50 (3):60. doi:10.14452/MR-050-03-1998-07_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. R., R. Binimelis, M. P. Pimbert, and M. G. Rivera-Ferre. 2019. Introduction to the symposium on critical adult education in food movements: Learning for transformation in and beyond food movements—the why, where, how and the what next? Agriculture and Human Values 36 (3):521–29. doi:10.1007/s10460-019-09941-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. R., J. Bruil, M. J. Chappell, C. Kiss, and M. P. Pimbert. 2019. From transition to domains of transformation: Getting to sustainable and just food systems through agroecology. Sustainability 11 (19):5272. doi:10.3390/su11195272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R. 2017. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. 1999. Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education 31 (1):15–26. doi:10.1080/00958969909598628.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, F. J., and J. Rotmans. 2018. A proposed theoretical framework for actors in transformative change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 128:275–86. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. 2017. The political economy of food systems reform. European Review of Agricultural Economics 44 (4):705–731. doi:10.1093/erae/jbx009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1):107–15. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. The Future of Food and Farming. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0713&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2014). Building a common vision for sustainable agriculture. Principles and Approaches. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3940e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feola, G., A. M. Lerner, M. Jain, M. J. F. Montefrio, and K. A. Nicholas. 2015. Researching farmer behaviour in climate change adaptation and sustainable agriculture: Lessons learned from five case studies. Journal of Rural Studies 39:74–84. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. 1998. What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology 2 (3):300–19. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gliessman, S. R. 2014. Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. Boca Raton: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2018a. Defining agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42 (6):599–600. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1432329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2018b. Scaling-out and scaling-up agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42 (8):841–42. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1481249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales de Molina, M., and D. Lopez-Garcia. 2021. Principles for designing Agroecology-based local (territorial) Agri-food Systems: A critical revision. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 45 (7):1050–82. doi:10.1080/21683565.2021.1913690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., N. Gill, and M. Voyer. 2019. Transformational adaptation on the farm: Processes of change and persistence in transitions to ‘climate-smart’ regenerative agriculture. Global Environmental Change 59:101965. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., K. Grimm, and B. E. Goldstein. 2020. A half century of Holistic Management: What does the evidence reveal? Agriculture and Human Values 37 (3):849–67. doi:10.1007/s10460-020-10016-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenni, S., K. Soini, and L. G. Horlings. 2020. The inner dimension of sustainability transformation: How sense of place and values can support sustainable place-shaping. Sustainability Science 15 (2):411–22. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00743-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J. Schot. 2010. Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, J., W. Hulsink, and J. Grin. 2016. Entrepreneurship in agriculture and healthcare: Different entry strategies of care farmers. Journal of Rural Studies 43:27–39. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, L., C. Farbotko, C. Gibson, N. Gill, and G. Waitt. 2013. Zones of friction, zones of traction: The connected household in climate change and sustainability policy. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 20 (4):351–62. doi:10.1080/14486563.2013.835286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, S. B. 2014. Considerations for enabling the ecological redesign of organic and conventional agriculture: A social ecology and psychosocial perspective. In Organic farming, prototype for sustainable agricultures, eds.S. Bellon and S. Penvern, 401–22. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• HLPE. 2019. Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/ca5602en/ca5602en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Home, R., O. Balmer, I. Jahrl, M. Stolze, and L. Pfiffner. 2014. Motivations for implementation of ecological compensation areas on Swiss lowland farms. Journal of Rural Studies 34:26–36. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlings, L. G. 2015a. The inner dimension of sustainability: Personal and cultural values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14:163–69. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlings, L. G. 2015b. Values in place; a value-oriented approach toward sustainable place-shaping. Regional Studies, Regional Science 2 (1):257–74. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1014062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. (2019). In Global assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Chapter 2: Status and trends; direct and indirect drivers of change. Retrieved from https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/ipbes_global_assessment_chapter_2_1_drivers_unedited_31may.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2022: Summary for Policymakers [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–33, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.001.
   Google Scholar
• Ives, C. D., R. Freeth, and J. Fischer. 2020. Inside-out sustainability: The neglect of inner worlds. Ambio 49 (1):208–17. doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01187-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., G. T. Green, and S. B. Castleberry. 2011. Construction and validation of an instrument to measure environmental orientations in a diverse group of children. Environment and Behavior 43 (1):72–89. doi:10.1177/0013916509345212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LNV. (2018). Landbouw, natuur en voedsel: waardevol en verbonden. Nederland als koplopers in kringlooplandbouw. Retrieved from file: ///Users/elianebakker/Downloads/visie-landbouw-natuur-en-voedsel-waardevol-en-verbonden%20(3).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2007. Transition management. new mode of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Garcia, D., and M. Gonzalez de Molina. 2021. An operational approach to agroecology-based local agri-food systems. Sustainability 13 (15):8443. doi:10.3390/su13158443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, C., and K. Sherren. 2018. Holistic management and adaptive grazing: A trainers’ view. Sustainability 10 (6):1848. doi:10.3390/su10061848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C., and D. D. Perkins. 2006. Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature 20 (4):335–50. doi:10.1177/0885412205286160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 1994. Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly 44 (4):222–32. doi:10.1177/074171369404400403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 1997. Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 1997 (74):5–12. doi:10.1002/ace.7401.
   Google Scholar
• Mihaylov, N., and D. D. Perkins. 2014. Community Place Attachment and its Role in Social Capital Development in Response to Environmental Disruption. In Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications, eds. L. Manzo and P. Devine-Wright, 61–74. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J., P. Gaskell, J. Ingram, J. Dwyer, M. Reed, and C. Short. 2017. Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (2):283–99. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. B., and M. P. Mueller. 2011. A philosophical analysis of David Orr’s theory of ecological literacy: Biophilia, ecojustice and moral education in school learning communities. Cultural Studies of Science Education 6 (1):193–221. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9274-6.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, K., and C. Cocklin. 2011. Participation in biodiversity conservation: Motivations and barriers of Australian landholders. Journal of Rural Studies 27 (3):331–42. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyéléni International Forum for Agroecology (2015). Declaration of the International Forum for Agroecology. Retrieved on 12-10-2022 from https://www.foodsovereignty.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Download-declaration-Agroecology-Nyeleni-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’brien, K. 2012. Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography 36 (5):667–76. doi:10.1177/0309132511425767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’brien, K. 2018. Is the 1.5 C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 31:153–60. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’brien, K., and L. Sygna. (2013). Responding to climate change: The three spheres of transformation. Proceedings of transformation in a changing climate, 19-21 June 2013, Oslo, Norway, 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Padel, S., L. Levidow, and B. Pearce. 2020. UK farmers’ transition pathways towards agroecological farm redesign: Evaluating explanatory models. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44 (2):139–63. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1631936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PBL. (2020). Balans van de Leefomgeving 2020. Retrieved from https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2020-balans-van-de-leefomgeving-2020-4165.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pfister, H. R., and G. Böhm. 2008. The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making 3 (1):5. doi:10.1017/S1930297500000127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savory, A., and J. Butterfield. 1999. Holistic management: A new framework for decision making. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood, S., S. Van Bommel, and M. Paredes. 2016. Self-organization and the bypass: Re-imagining institutions for more sustainable development in agriculture and food. Agriculture 6 (4):66. doi:10.3390/agriculture6040066.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, L. A., R. J. Burton, J. Ingram, K. Blackstock, B. Slee, and N. Gotts. 2012. Triggering change: Towards a conceptualisation of major change processes in farm decision-making. Journal of Environmental Management 104:142–51. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. W. 2007. An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education 26 (2):173–91. doi:10.1080/02601370701219475.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. W. 2017. Transformative learning theory. In Educare gli affetti: studi in onore di Bruno Rossi, ed.L. Fabbri, 301–320. Rome: Armando.
   Google Scholar
• Tscharntke, T., A. M. Klein, A. Kruess, I. Steffan-dewenter, and C. Thies. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8 (8):857–74. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, A., D. Melman, J. Westerink, N. Polman, T. Vogelzang, and H. Korevaar. 2016. Food-for-thought: Natuurinclusieve landbouw. Wageningen: Wageningen University & Research.
   Google Scholar
• Van Herzele, A., A. Gobin, P. Van Gossum, L. Acosta, T. Waas, N. Dendoncker, and B. Henry de Frahan. 2013. Effort for money? Farmers' rationale for participation in agri-environment measures with different implementation complexity. Journal of Environmental Management 131:110–12. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, J., T. A. De Boer, M. Pleijte, and R. A. M. Schrijver. 2019. Kan een goede boer natuurinclusief zijn?: De rol van culturele normen in een beweging richting natuurinclusieve landbouw. Wageningen University & Research. doi:10.18174/508108.
   Google Scholar
• Westley, F., P. Olsson, C. Folke, T. Homer-Dixon, H. Vredenburg, D. Loorbach, Thompson, J., M. Nilsson, E. Lambin, J. Sendzimir, B. Banerjee, Galaz, V., S. Van der Leeuw. 2011. Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio 40 (7):762–80. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wezel, A., S. Bellon, T. Doré, C. Francis, D. Vallod, and C. David. 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (4):503–15. doi:10.1051/agro/2009004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and B. M. Wildemuth. 2009. Unstructured Interview. In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, ed. B. M. Wildemuth, 239–47. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar