Participatory action research with wheat landrace producers and community supported agriculture groups; a case from Turkey

References

• Akçura, M., O. Hocaoğlu, and H. Kılıç. 2013. Karadeniz bölgesine ait yerel ekmeklik buğday hatlarının tanedeki besin elementleri içerikleri yönünden tescilli ekmeklik buğday çeşitleri ile karşılaştırılması (Comparison of local bread wheat lines belonging to the black sea region with registered bread wheat varieties in terms of grain nutrient content). In Türkiye 10. Tarla bitkileri kongresi (10th field crops congress of Turkey), 53–60. Konya. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1357.8643.
   Google Scholar
• Atalan-Helicke, N. 2019. Piyasalar ve Kolektif Davranış: Geleneksel Buğday Türleri Üzerine Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 59 (1):13–30. doi:10.26650/JECS402676.
   Google Scholar
• Bagana, M. A., and O. N. Koçtürk. 1975. İşçinin beslenmesi ve milli prodüktivite (Worker’s nutrition and national productivity). In Mediterranea, Vol. 6 (41), 157. Ankara: Türk-iş yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Boxstael, F., H. Aerts, S. Linssen, J. Latré, A. Christiaens, G. Haesaert, I. Dierick, J. Brusselled, and W. De Keyzera. 2020. A comparison of the nutritional value of einkorn, emmer, khorasan, and modern wheat: Whole grains, processed in bread, and population-level intake implications. Journal of the Science and Food of Agriculture 100 (11):4108–18. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns, F., S. Geisslitz, C. Guzman, T. M. Ikeda, A. Arzani, G. Latella, S. Simsek, M. Colomba, A. Gregorini, V. Zevallos, et al. 2022. Do ancient wheats contain less gluten than modern bread wheat, in favour of better health? Nutrition Bulletin 47 (2):157–67. doi:10.1111/nbu.12551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caio, G., U. Volta, A. Sapone, D. A. Leffler, R. D. Giorgio, C. Catassi, and A. Fasano. 2019. Celiac disease: A comprehensive current review. BMC Medicine 17 (142):1–20. doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1380-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chambers, R. 1994. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 22 (7):953–69. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuéllar-Padilla, M., and A. Calle-Collado. 2011. Can we find solutions with people? Participatory action research with small organic producers in Andalusia. Journal of Rural Studies 27 (4):372–83. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalyrmple, D. G. 1998. Changes in wheat varieties and yields in the United States; 1919-1984. Agricultural History 62 (4):20–36.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, W. 2014. Buğday Göbeği (Wheat Belly). translated by Ekin Duru. Istanbul: Pegasus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dohan, F. C. 1966. Wheat ‘consumption’ and hospital admissions for schizophrenia during World War II. A Preliminary Report 18 (1):7–10. doi:10.1093/ajcn/18.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X., S. W. Liu, Q. Sun, and G. M. Xia. 2010. High frequency of HMW-GS sequence variation through somatic hybridization between Agropyron elongatum and common what. Planta 23 (2):245–50. doi:10.1007/s00425-009-1040-1.
   Google Scholar
• Gloria, I. G., D. López, L. Román, and M. A. Antonio. 2013. Participatory action research in agroecology: Building local organic food networks in spain. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1):127–46. doi:10.1080/10440046.2012.718997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagöz, A. 2014. Wheat landraces of Turkey. Emirates Journal of Food & Agriculture (EJFA) 26 (2):149. doi:10.9755/ejfa.v26i2.16397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakoç, U. 2008. Productivity and structure in Turkish agriculture 1950-1991. thesis submitted to the department of economic history in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of science (research), London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnebrew, E., C. K. Molander, S. Wilcox Warren, C. E. Horner, V. M. Izzo, S. A. Lewins, R. Maden, G. L. Galford, and V. Ernesto Méndez. 2023. Tradeoffs of a rising agroecological practice: Addressing uncertainty around tarping with participatory action research and mixed methods. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 47 (3):355–81. doi:10.1080/21683565.2022.2146254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçtürk, O. N. 2009. Açlık Korkusu, TMMOB Ziraat Mühendisleri Odasi. Ankara: Özdoğan Matbaa.
   Google Scholar
• López-García, D., M. Cuéllar-Padilla, A. A. Olival, N. P. Laranjeira, V. E. Méndez, S. P. Parada, C. A. Barbosa, C. B. Salas, M. Caswell, R. Cohen, et al. 2021. Building agroecology with people. Challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts. Journal of Rural Studies 83:257–67. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, V. G., O. F. Giraldo, H. Morales, P. M. Rosset, and J. M. Duarte. 2019. Seed sovereignty and agroecological scaling: Two cases of seed recovery, conservation, and defense in Colombia. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 43 (7–8):827–47. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1578720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., M. Caswell, S. R. Gliessman, and R. Cohen. 2017. Integrating agroecology and participatory action research (par): Lessons from central america. Sustainability 9 (5):705. doi:10.3390/su9050705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molberg, O., A. K. Uhlen, T. Jensen, N. S. Flæte, B. Fleckenstein, H. Arentz–Hansen, M. Raki, K. E. A. Lundin, and L. M. Sollid. 2005. Mapping of gluten T-cell epitopes in the bread wheat ancestors: Implications for celiac disease. Gasstroenterol 128 (2):393–401. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkaya, T. 1998. Bir Katılımcı Öğrenim ve Eylem Araştırması: Bademli fidancılık projesi. Ege Üniversitesi Tarımsal Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi. İzmir: Türkiye Ziraat Odaları Birliği Yayını.
   Google Scholar
• Özkaya, T., B. Karaturhan, and M. Boyacı. 1998. Kırsal Kalkınmada Çiftçi Katılımının Önemi Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Halilbeyli Köyü Örneği. Ege Üniversitesi Tarımsal Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi. İzmir: Türkiye Ziraat Odaları Birliği Yayını.
   Google Scholar
• Patnaik, A., J. Jongerden, and G. Ruivenkamp. 2017. Repossession through sharing of and access to seeds: Different cases and practices. International Review of Sociology 27 (1):179–201. doi:10.1080/03906701.2016.1235213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W., E. P. Wilhelm, M. I. Boulton, T. E. S. Barber, A. J. Greenland, and H. Bürstmayr. 2013. Genotype analysis of the wheat semidwarf rht-b1b and rht-d1b ancestral lineage. Plant Breeding 132 (6):539–45. doi:10.1111/pbr.12099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachet, E., O. Mertz, J.-F. Le Coq, G. S. Cruz-Garcia, W. Francesconi, M. Bonin, and M. Quintero. 2021. Agroecological transitions: A systematic review of research approaches and prospects for participatory action methods. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5:1–13. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.709401.
   Google Scholar
• Shewry, P. R., N. G. Halford, P. S. Belton, A. S. Tatham, A. J. Bailey, J. Macmillan, P. R. Shrewry, and A. S. Tatham. 2002. The structure and properties of gluten: An elastic protein from wheat grain. Phil Trans Roy Soc London 357 (1418):133–42. doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.1024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smale, M. 1997. The green revolution and wheat genetic diversity: Some unfounded assumptions. World Development 25 (8):1257–69. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00038-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadesse, W., M. Sanchez-Garcia, S. G. Assefa, A. Amri, Z. Bishaw, F. C. Ogbonnaya, and M. Baum. 2019. Genetic gains in wheat breeding and its role in feeding the world. Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics 1:1–28. doi:10.20900/cbgg20190005.
   Google Scholar
• Vernooy, R., B. Sthapit, G. Otieno, P. Shrestha, and A. Gupta. 2017. The roles of community seed banks in climate change adaption. Development in Practice 27 (3):316–27. doi:10.1080/09614524.2017.1294653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, Y. 1998. What İs participatory action research? action research international is a refereed on-line journal of action research published under the aegis of the institute of workplace research. Melbourne: Learning and Development and Southern Cross University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WWF. 2016. Türkiye’nin Buğday Atlası. İSTANBUL: Oluşur Basım.
   Google Scholar
• Yingyin, Y., N. Zhongfu, Z. Yinhong, C. Yan, D. Yuhua, H. Zongfu, L. Zhiyong, and S. Qixin. 2005. Identification of differentially expressed genes in leaf and root between wheat hybrid and its parental inbreds using PCR-based cDNA subtraction. Plant Molecular Biology 58 (3):367–84. doi:10.1007/s11103-005-5102-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar