Commentary on current practices and future directions for the assessment of child and adolescent intelligence in schools around the world

References

• Alkiyumi, M. T. (2016). Measuring intelligence in the Sultanate of Oman. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 262–265.
   Google Scholar
• Bablekou, Z., & Kazi, S. (2016). Intellectual assessment of children and adolescents: The case of Greece. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 225–230. doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1163655.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, J. (2016). Present status and challenges of intellectual assessment in India. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 231–240. doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1163676.
   Google Scholar
• Blumen, S. (2016). New trends on intellectual assessment in Peru. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 254–261.
   Google Scholar
• Das, J. P., Kirby, J., & Jarman, R. F. (1975). Simultaneous and successive synthesis: An alternative model for cognitive abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 195–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (Vol. 84). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, J. C., Ostrosky, F., & Lozano, A. (2014). Batería Neuropsicológica de funciones ejecutivas y lóbulos frontales [Neuropsychological Battery of Executive Functions and Frontal Lobes]. México DF: Manual Moderno.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R., & Widaman, K. F. (2008). The Flynn effect and the shadow of the past: Mental retardation and the indefensible and indispensable role of IQ. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 35, 121–149.
   Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., Konold, T. R., & McDermott, P. A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrigan, P. J. (2001). Church, state, and education in France from the Falloux to the Ferry laws: A reassessment. Canadian Journal of History, 36(1), 51–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hurks, P. P. M., & Bakker, H. (2016). Assessing intelligence in children and youth living in the Netherlands. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 266–275. doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1166754.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikuma, T., Matsuda, O., Fujita, K., & Ueno, K. (2016). Intellectual assessment of children and youth in Japan: Past, present, and future. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 241–246. doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1163711.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., Lichtenberger, E. O., Fletcher-Janzen, E., & Kaufman, N. L. (2005). Essentials of KABC-II Assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E., & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kovaleski, J. F., VenDerHeyden, A. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2013). The RTI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J. H., Benson, N., & Floyd, R. G. (2015). Using estimated factor scores from a bifactor analysis to examine the unique effects of the latent variables measured by the WAIS-IV on academic achievement. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1402–1416. doi:10.1037/pas0000119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J. H., Benson, N., & Floyd, R. G. (2016). Intellectual assessment of children and youth in the United States of America: Past, present, and future. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 276–282. doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1166759.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, N., & Kaufman, N. (2006). Introduction to the special issue, part one: It's about the what, the how well, and the why. Psychology in the Schools, 43(7), 747–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matute, E. (2014). Evaluación Neuropsicológica Infantil (ENI) [Infant neuropsychological evaluation]. Mexico DF: Manual Moderno.
   Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A., Das, J. P., & Goldstein, S. (2014). Cognitive assessment system—CAS2 (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Oman Ministry of Education. (2012). Education in Oman: The drive for quality. Muscat, Oman: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Escobedo, P., Esquivel-Ancona, F., & Hollingworth, L. (2016). Intellectual assessment of children and youth in Mexico: Past, present, and future. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 247–253. doi:10.1080/21683603.2016.1163745.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. J. (2013). What if we took our models seriously? Estimating latent scores in individuals. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(2), 186–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VenDerhayden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2010). Essentials of response to intervention. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, S. M., & Nakano, T. C. (2016). Cognitive assessment of Brazilian children and youth: Past and present perspectives and challenges. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 4(4), 215–224.
   Google Scholar