The role of embodied cognition for transforming learning

References

• Abrahamson, D. (2012). Seeing chance: Perceptual reasoning as an epistemic resource for grounding compound event spaces. ZDM—International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(7), 869–881. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0454-6
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D., & Lindgren, R. (2014). Embodiment and embodied design. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D., Trninic, D., Gutiérrez, J. F., Huth, J., & Lee, R. G. (2011). Hooks and shifts: A dialectical study of mediated discovery. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(1), 55–85.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Frank, S., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). Reconciling embodied and distributional Accounts of meaning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 359–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbib, M. A. (Ed.). (2006). Action to language via the mirror neuron system. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Damasio, A. (2008). Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1), 35–39. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badets, A., & Pesenti, M. (2010). Creating number semantics through finger movement perception. Cognition, 115(1), 46–53. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F. (2009). The future of psychology: Connecting mind to brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 326–339. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01134.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, K. W., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulations in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesse (Eds), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berteletti, I., & Booth, J. R. (2015). Perceiving fingers in single-digit arithmetic problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(226), 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Chen, L. (2016). Why kids should use their fingers in math class. Atlantic, 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/04/why-kids-should-use-their-fingers-in-math-class/478053/ntary-jo-boaler?newsletter=true
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M, & Caruana, F. (2015). Embodiment theories. In: J. D. Wright (Ed), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed.,). Vol 7. Oxford: Elsevier (pp. 317–333).
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Pecher, D. (2011). Introduction to the special topic embodied and grounded cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 187. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., Scorolli, C., Caligiore, D., Baldassarre, G., & Tummolini, L. (2013). The embodied mind extended: Using words as social tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broaders, S. C., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 539–550. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. doi:10.1037/a0031084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, K. J., Huang, H. W., Fang, W. C., & Chen, N. S. (2013). Embodied play to learn: Exploring kinect-facilitated memory performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 151–155. doi:10.1111/bjet.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (2000). “Concrete” manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 45–60. doi:10.2304/ciec.2000.1.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., & Leung, A. K. Y. (2009). The hard embodiment of culture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1278–1289. doi:10.1002/ejsp.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., Leung, A. K. Y., & Ijzerman, H. (2009). Culture, psyche, and body make each other up. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1298–1299. doi:10.1002/ejsp.698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynnot, D. (2013). Flexible and fast: Linguistic shortcut affects both shallow and deep conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 542–550. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0368-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research, 1079(1), 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1925/1958). The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 16). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Luca, S., Granà, A., Semenza, C., Seron, X., & Pesenti, M. (2006). Finger–digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(9), 1648–1663.
   Google Scholar
• Di Luca, S., & Pesenti, M. (2008). Masked priming effect with canonical finger numeral configurations. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 27–39. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1132-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Luca, S., & Pesenti, M. (2011). Finger numeral representations: More than just another symbolic code. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 272. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00272/full
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domahs, F., Domahs, U., Schlesewsky, M., Ratinckx, M., Verguts, E., Willmes, T., Domahs, K. & Nuerk, H. –C. (2007). Neighborhood consistency in mental arithmetic: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(1), 66. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-3-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domahs, F., Krinzinger, H., & Willmes, K. (2008). Mind the gap between both hands: Evidence for internal finger-based number representations in children’s mental calculation. Cortex, 44, 359–367. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, J., Roehrig, G., & Varma, S. (2013). Infusing neuroscience into teacher professional development. Education Researcher, 42(6), 317–329. doi:10.3102/0013189X13499403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, G. M. (1943). Remedial techniques in basic school subjects. New York, NY : McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., . . . LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 1(1), 101–103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (Classic ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. (1999). Why mental models must be embodied. Advances in Psychology, 128(C), 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A., Willford, J., Gibson, B., Goldberg, A., & Zhu, X. (2011). Improving reading to improve math. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1–25. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.564245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905–922. Epub April 27, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Goldberg, A. B., & Zhu, X. (2011). Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instructional Science, 39, 27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3), 558–565. doi:10.3758/BF03196313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28(1), 1–26. doi:10.1080/01638539909545067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldinger, S. D., Papesh, M. H., Barnhart, A. S., Hansen, W. A., & Hout, M. C. (2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(4), 959–978. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golonka, S., & Wilson, A. D. (2012). Gibson’s ecological approach. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2012, January). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching handwriting. Paper presented at Handwriting in the 21st Century? An Educational Summit, co-sponsored by American Association of School Administrators and Zaner Bloser, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armony, J., Ellis, R., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2735–2740. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02695.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochman, J., & MacDermott-Duffy, B. ( Spring 2015). Effective writing instruction: Time for a revolution. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 31–37. Retrieved from http://1ll76r4coqvu2q936a2i0d2h.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/4-Hochman-Effective-Writing-Spring-2015-copy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radical enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. O.,Seegers, S., Lepic, R., Hodgdon, E., Nozomi, T., & Ilkbasaran, D. (2014). Organizing a lexicon with patterned iconicity. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies.San Diego: CA. Retrieved from http://www.gesturestudies.com/files/isgsconferences/ISGS14Abstracts_talks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 32–42. JOUR. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2012.08.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188–205. doi:10.1093/mind/os-IX.34.188
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M., (2006). Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., & Megowan-Romanowicz, C. (2017). Embodied science and mixed reality: How gesture and motion capture affect physics education. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(24). doi:10.1186/s41235-017-0060-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D. A., & Savio-Ramos, C. (2016). Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1819), 1–22. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 508–529. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P., & Jones, J. L. (2014). Grounding language in our bodies. In T. M. Holtgraves (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 317–329). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., Schuler, S., Mayer, C., Trumpp, N., Hille, K., & Sachse, S. (2015). Handwriting or typewriting? The influence of pen or keyboard-based writing training on reading and writing performance in preschool handwriting. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 11(4), 136–146. doi:10.5709/acp-0178-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., & Trumpp, N. M. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends Neuroscience and Education, 1, 15–20. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2012.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kontra, C., Lyons, D. J., Fischer, S. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Physical experience enhances science learning. Psychological Science, 26(6), 737–749. doi:10.1177/0956797615569355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M. (1975). Information representation in visual images. Cognitive Psychology, 7(3), 341–370. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90015-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krois, J. M., Rosengren, M., Steidele, A., & Westerkamp, D. (Eds.). (2007). Embodiment in cognition and culture (Vol. 71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987). Fire, women and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 773–785. doi:10.1111/tops.2012.4.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486. doi:10.2307/2025464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Leitan, N. D., & Chaffey, L. (2014). Embodied cognition and its applications: A brief review. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain & Culture, 10(1), 3–10. doi:10.7790/sa.v10i1.384
   Google Scholar
• Leung, A. K., & Cohen, D. (2007). The soft embodiment of culture: Camera angles and motion through time and space. Psychological Science, 18(9), 824–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, A. K. Y., Qiu, L., Ong, L., & Tam, K. P. (2011). Embodied cultural cognition: Situating the study of embodied cognition in socio-cultural contexts. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(9), 591–608. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00373.x
   Google Scholar
• Liutsko, L., Veraksa, A. N., & Yakupova, V. A. (2017). Embodied finger counting in children with different cultural backgrounds and hand dominance. Psychology in Russia, 10(4), 86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Longcamp, M., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., & Velay, J. L. (2003). Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1492–1500. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00088-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J. C., & Velay, J. L. (2006). Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Human Movement Science, 25(4–5), 646–656. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M. T., & Velay, J. L. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119(1), 67–79. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. (2011). Stormy seas and cloudy skies: Conceptual processing is (still) linguistic and perceptual. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G., & Clark, A. (2015). Words and the world: Predictive coding and the language-perception-cognition interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 279–284. doi:10.1177/0963721415570732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Language is not just for talking: Redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1077–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedonia, M., & Klimesch, W. (2014). Long–term effects of gestures on memory for foreign language words trained in the classroom. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8, 74–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z. (2015). The burden of embodied cognition. Canadian Journal Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 172–178. doi:10.1037/cep0000060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, 102, 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2007). Improving Native American children’s listening comprehension through concrete representations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 537–550. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review Psychology, 58, 25–45. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T., & Schwartz, D. L. (2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 587–625. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, K., Martignon, L., Wessolowski, S., Engel, J., & Nuerk, H. C. (2011). Effects of finger counting on numerical development: The opposing views of neurocognition and mathematics education. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(328), 75–79. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montessori, M. M. (1966). The human tendencies and Montessori education. Amsterdam: Association Montessori Internationale.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, P., & Oppenheimer, D. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: ad- vantages of longhand over laptop note taking, Psychological Science, 25, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Noë, A.. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicano, A., Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2017). Editorial: Bridging the theories of affordances and limb apraxia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(March), 10–12. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penner-Wilger, M., & Anderson, M. L. (2013). The relation between finger gnosis and mathematical ability: Why redeployment of neural circuits best explains the finding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 877. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peverly, S. T.,Vekaria, P. C., Reddington, L. A., Sumowski, J. F., Johnson, K. R., & Ramsay, C. M. (2013). The relationship of handwriting speed, working memory, language comprehension and outlines to lecture note-taking and test-taking among college students, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, R, & Bongard, J. (2007). How the body shapes the way we think: A new view of intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouw, W. T. J. L., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). An embedded and embodied cognition review of instructional manipulatives. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 51–72. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9255-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7(4), 226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat, M. J., Caruana, F., Jezzini, A., Intskirveli, I., Grammont, F., Gallese, V., . . . Umiltà, M. A. (2010). Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation. Experimental Brain Research, 204(4), 605–616. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2329-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T. W., & Semin, G. R. (2009). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1135–1141. doi:10.1002/ejsp.v39:7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, H. (Ed.). (2001). Mathematics across cultures: The history of non-western mathematics. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. (2007). The embodied cognition research programme. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 338–346. doi:10.1111/phco.2007.2.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. A. (2011). Embodied cognition: Lessons from linguistic determinism. Philosophical Topics, 39(1), 121–140. doi:10.5840/philtopics201139117
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review, 25(3), 278–298. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey, M. J. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, S. M., Eigsti, I. M., Gifford, T., & Bhat, A. N. (2016). The effects of embodied rhythm and robotic interventions on the spontaneous and responsive verbal communication skills of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A further outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 73–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 273–281. doi:10.1162/0898929053124965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore, R., & Knalfl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Update methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(3), 546–553. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willems, R. M., & Francken, J. C. (2012). Embodied cognition: Taking the next step. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(582). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. doi:10.3758/bf03196322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2010). The re-tooled mind: How culture re-engineers cognition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2–3), 180–187. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A., & Foglia, L. (2017). Embodied cognition. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/
   Google Scholar
• Winn, W. (2003). Learning in artificial environments: Embodiment, embeddedness and dynamic adaptation. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1(1), 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, F., Cote, M., & Baker, A. (2005). Labeling guides object individuation in 12-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 16(5), 372–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziemke, T. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on situated and embodied cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(3), 271–274. doi:10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00068-2
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 224–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511499968.010
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1–11. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar