Relationships between learning strategies and self-efficacy: A cross-cultural comparison between Taiwan and the United States using latent class analysis

References

• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi:10.1007/bf02294359
   Google Scholar
• Artelt, C. (2005). Cross-cultural approaches to measuring motivation. Educational Assessment, 10, 231–255. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1003_5
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 139–161. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Journal of Applied Psychology: an International Review, 51, 269–290. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., & Demmrich, A. (2001). Test motivation in the assessment of student skills: The effects of incentives on motivation and performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 441. doi:10.1007/BF03173192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. L., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21, 416–428. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. L., & Karabenick, S. A. (2016). Construct validity of self-reported metacognitive learning strategies. Educational Assessment, 21, 19–33. doi:10.1080/10627197.2015.1127751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1998). Learning from the Confucian heritage: So size doesn’t matter? International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 723–738. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00060-3
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2013). How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires. Psychological Methods, 18, 36–52. doi:10.1037/a0030641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., Chow, C. B., & Mcbride-Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 344–365. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin, B., & Watkins, D. (2000). The role of repetition in the processes of memorising and understanding: A comparison of the views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 65–84. doi:10.1348/000709900157976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, A. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 191–195. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305–321). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievements. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S.-C. E. (2009). Characteristics of East Asian learners: What we learned from PISA. Educational Research Journal, 24, 327–348.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, P. Y. (2014). Reflective practice in American and Taiwanese classrooms. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 9, 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40, 99–121. doi:10.1023/A:1004036826490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., & Gow, L. Y. N. (1990). Cultural specificity of approaches to study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 356–363. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00952.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köller, O. (2001). Mathematical world views and achievement in advanced mathematics in Germany: Findings from TIMSS population 3. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 65–78. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00014-1
   Google Scholar
• Leung, F. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, F. K. (2017). Making sense of mathematics achievement in East Asia: Does culture really matter? In Kaiser (Ed.), In Proceedings of the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 201–218). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L. (2009). An investigation of factors affecting gender differences in standardized math performance: Results from US and Hong Kong 15 year olds. International Journal of Testing, 9, 215–237. doi:10.1080/15305050903106875
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., & Wilson, M. (2009). Gender differences and similarities in PISA 2003 mathematics: A comparison between the United States and Hong Kong. International Journal of Testing, 9, 20–40. doi:10.1080/15305050902733547
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayarna, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McInerney, D. M. (2011). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 442–464). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Metallidou, P., & Vlachou, A. (2007). Motivational beliefs, cognitive engagement, and achievement in language and mathematics in elementary school children. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 2–15. doi:10.1080/00207590500411179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2015). Mplus (7.4) [Computer Program]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (Volume IV). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2014a). PISA 2012 Technical Report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and 2 what they can do with what they know. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 87–100. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J., & Chan, C. (2003). Dual scaling analysis of Chinese students’ conceptions of learning. Educational Psychology, 23, 181–193. doi:10.1080/0144341032000039565
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of academic motivation (pp. 15–31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1080/01443410303231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclove, L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343. doi:10.1007/BF02294360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2017). Self-beliefs: Strong correlates of mathematics achievement and intelligence. Intelligence, 61, 11–16. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111−133. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 359–384. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Muis, K. R. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (New Directions in Measures and Methods Vol. 12, pp. 121–155). Amsterdam, Netherlands: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. R. (2005). The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 25–40. doi:10.1177/0273475304273346
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2008). A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Flemish university students: Do they differ in learning conceptions and approaches to learning? Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 120–127. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Labuhn, A. S. (2012). Self-regulation of learning: Process approaches to personal development. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA Educational psychology handbook Vol 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 399–426). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628. doi:10.3102/00028312023004614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar