The First Amendment v. reproductive rights: Crisis pregnancy centers, commercial speech, and marketplaces of misinformation

Bibliography

• 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island . 517 U.S. 484. (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A. “Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent, and the First Amendment.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43, no. 1 (2015): 51–58. doi:10.1111/jlme.12195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, P. , and M. Pertschuk . “The Law of Deception: The Past as Prologue.” American University Law Review 33 (1984): 849–897.
   Google Scholar
• Bates v. State Bar of Arizona . 433 U.S. 350. (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Bigelow v. Virginia . 421 U.S. 809. (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corporation . 463 U.S. 60. (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Borgner v. Florida Bd. of Dentistry . 537 U.S. 1080. (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Brief for the State Respondents . Nos. 16-1140, 16-1146, 16-1153. Accessed May 24, 2017. (available on SCOTUSblog).
   Google Scholar
• Brief of 51 Reproductive Rights, Civil Rights, and Social Justice Organizations as Amici Curiae. No. 16-1140. Accessed February 27, 2018. (available on SCOTUSblog).
   Google Scholar
• Brief of American Medical Association in Support of Respondents as Amici Curiae . No. 16-1140. Accessed February 27, 2018. (available on SCOTUSblog).
   Google Scholar
• Brief of Equal Rights Advocates, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, California Women Lawyers, Hadassah, and the Family Violence Appellate Project in Support of Respondents as Amici Curiae . No. 16-1140. (available on SupremeCourt.gov).
   Google Scholar
• Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association . 564 U.S. 786, 802. (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A. G. , and J. J. Swartz . “Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers are Legal but Unethical.” AMA Journal of Ethics 20, no. 3 (2018): 269–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• California Health & Safety Code, § 123472(a) . (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, M. A. , and T. Varma . “Sowing Wild Oats: Online Anonymous Commercial Speech, Corporate Takeovers, and A New Commercial Speech Doctrine.” First Amendment Studies 48, no. 2 (2014): 97–109. doi:10.1080/21689725.2014.950494.
   Google Scholar
• Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York . 447 U.S. 557. (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Chemerinsky, E. “Symposium: Ensuring Accurate Information for Patients Does not Violate the First Amendment.” SCOTUSblog . Accessed December 12, 2017. https://www.scotusblog.com/2017/12/symposium-ensuring-accurate-information-patients-not-violate-first-amendment/
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. K. L. “Exceptional Freedom—The Roberts Court, the First Amendment, and the New Absolutism.” Albany law review 76, no. 1 (2012): 409–466.
   Google Scholar
• Fein, B. “End the First Amendment Sanctuary for Fake News.” The American Conservative . Accessed February 27, 2019. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/end-the-first-amendment-sanctuary-for-fake-news/
   Google Scholar
• Gaylord, S. W. “A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech.” The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43, no. 1 (2015): 35–50. doi:10.1111/jlme.12194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss, P. “The First Amendment’s Weakest Link: Government Regulation of Controversial Advertising.” Free Speech Yearbook 14, no. 1 (1975): 21–34. doi:10.1080/08997225.1975.10555939.
   Google Scholar
• Haan, S. C. “The Post-Truth First Amendment.” Indiana Law Journal 94 (2018). forthcoming. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3209366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt, C. “Professional Speech.” Yale Law Journal 125 (2016): 1238–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt, C. E. “The Limits of Professional Speech.” Yale Law Journal Forum 128 (2018): 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, M. “How Crisis Pregnancy Centers Endanger the Health and Rights of Women of Color.” Ms. Magazine . Accessed December 12, 2019. https://msmagazine.com/2019/12/09/how-crisis-pregnancy-centers-endanger-the-health-and-rights-of-women-of-color/
   Google Scholar
• Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc . 515 U.S. 557. (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Ibanez v. Florida Department. of Business and Professional Regulations, Board of Accountancy . 512 U.S. 136. (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Keighley, J. M. “Can You Handle the Truth—Compelled Commercial Speech and the First Amendment.” Journal of Constitution Law 15 (2012): 539–596.
   Google Scholar
• Keighley, J. M. “Physician Speech and Mandatory Ultrasound Laws: The First Amendment’s Limit on Compelled Ideological Speech.” Cardozo law review 34 (2013): 2347–2405.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinski, A. , and S. Banner . “Who’s Afraid of Commercial Speech?” Virginia law review 76, no. 4 (1990): 627. doi:10.2307/1073208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee v. Cosby . 139 S. Ct. 675. (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Miami Herald Publishing Company v. Tornillo . 418 U.S. 241. (1974).
   Google Scholar
• NARAL . “Crisis Pregnancy Center Lie: The Insidious Threat to Reproductive Freedom.” NARAL . 2015. Accessed February 1, 2019. https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/cpc-report-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra . 138 S. Ct. 2361. (2018).
   Google Scholar
• New York Times Company. v. Sullivan . 376 U.S. 254. (1964).
   Google Scholar
• NIFLA . “About NIFLA.” NIFLA . Accessed February 8, 2018. https://nifla.org/about-nifla/
   Google Scholar
• “Notes: Repackaging Zauderer.” Harvard law review 130, no. 3 (2017): 972–993. https://harvardlawreview.org/2017/01/repackaging-zauderer/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association . 436 U.S. 447. (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Pittsburgh Press Company v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations . 4133 U.S. 376. (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey . 505 U.S. 833. (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Post, R. “The Constitutional Status of Commercial Speech.” UCLA Law Review 48, no. 2000–01: 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Pridgen, D. , and I. L. Preston . “Enhancing the Flow of Information in the Marketplace: From Caveat Emptor to Virginia Pharmacy and Beyond at the Federal Trade Commission.” Georgia Law Review 14, no. 4 summer, (1980): 635–680.
   Google Scholar
• Queen, B. “Democracy for a Consumer Society: Commercial Speech and the First Amendment 1938-1976.” In Consuming Visions: New Essays on the Politics of Consumption in Modern America , edited by D. Scroop , 70–95. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Redish, M. “Compelled Commercial Speech and the First Amendment.” Notre Dame Law Review 94, no. 4 (2019): 1749–1774.
   Google Scholar
• Redish, M. H. “Commercial Speech, First Amendment Intuitionism, and the Twilight Zone of Viewpoint Discrimination.” Loyola of Los Angeles law review 41 (2007): 1–140.
   Google Scholar
• Redish, M. H. , and K. Voils . “False Commercial Speech and the First Amendment: Understanding the Implications of the Equivalency Principle.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 25, no. 3 (2017): 765–799.
   Google Scholar
• Reed v. Town of Gilbert , 135 S. Ct. 2218. (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Reply Brief for Petitioners. No. 16-1140. Accessed March 13, 2018. (available on SCOTUSblog).
   Google Scholar
• Rikelman, J. “Symposium: The First Amendment Cannot Justify Lying to Women.” SCOTUSblog . Accessed December 13, 2017. https://www.scotusblog.com/2017/12/symposium-first-amendment-cannot-justify-lying-women/
   Google Scholar
• Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina . 487 U.S. 781. (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Rubin v. Coors Brewing Company . 514 U.S. 476. (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Rust v. Sullivan . 500 U.S. 173. (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A.. , and T. R. Kearns , eds. The Rhetoric of Law . Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, J. “Federal Regulation of Abortion Counseling and Referral: Doctoring the First Amendment.” Free Speech Yearbook 30, no. 1 (1992): 74–87. doi:10.1080/08997225.1992.10556141.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. R. “Ending the Confusion over Commercial Speech: Returning to the Central Hudson Test.” Free Speech Yearbook 33, no. 1 (1995): 1–12. doi:10.1080/08997225.1995.10556179.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. R. S. “ 44 Liquormart: Unanimity without Consensus.” Free Speech Yearbook 36, no. 1 (1998): 1–14. doi:10.1080/08997225.1998.10556221.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc . 564 U.S. 552. (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Suter, S. M. “The First Amendment and Physician Speech in Reproductive Decision Making.” The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43, no. 1 (2015): 22–34. doi:10.1111/jlme.12193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform . False and Misleading Health Information Provided by Federally Funded Pregnancy Resource Centers. July. (2006). Accessed July 2018. https://www.motherjones.com/wp-content/uploads/waxman2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valentine v. Chrestensen . 316 U.S. 52. (1942).
   Google Scholar
• Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council . 425 U.S. 748. (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Volokh, E. “The Law of Compelled Speech.” Texas law review 97, no. 2 (2018): 355–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volokh, E. “Statistics in NIFLA v. Becerra, the Crisis Pregnancy Center Disclosure Case.” The Volokh Conspiracy . Accessed July 22, 2019. http://reason.com/volokh/2018/07/22/statistics-in-nifla-v-becerra-the-crisis
   Google Scholar
• West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette . 319 U.S. 624. (1943).
   Google Scholar
• Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio . 471 U.S. 626. (1985).
   Google Scholar