Enhancing cisplatin delivery to hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells using dual sensitive smart nanocomposite

References

• Li X, Li R, Qian X, et al. Superior antitumor efficiency of cisplatin-loaded nanoparticles by intratumoral delivery with decreased tumor metabolism rate. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;70:726–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheate NJ, Walker S, Craig GE, et al. The status of platinum anticancer drugs in the clinic and in clinical trials. Dalton Trans. 2010;39:8113–8127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda V, Fuertes MA, Castilla J, et al. Biochemical mechanisms of cisplatin cytotoxicity. ACAMC. 2007;7:3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Yao X, Panichpisal K, Kurtzman N, et al. Cisplatin nephrotoxicity: a review. Am J Med Sci. 2007;334:115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Johnston KP, Williams IIIRO. Nanoparticle engineering processes for enhancing the dissolution rates of poorly water soluble drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30:233–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eatemadi A, Darabi M, Afraidooni L, et al. Comparison, synthesis and evaluation of anticancer drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles on breast cancer cell lines. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;44:1008–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudreault J, Shiu V, Bricarello A, et al. Concomitant administration of bevacizumab, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin: nonclinical safety and pharmacokinetics. Int J Toxicol. 2005;24:357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi E, Akbarzadeh A, Abbasi E, et al. Novel drug delivery system based on doxorubicin-encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles modified with PLGA-PEG1000 copolymer. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;44: 290–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorjikhah F, Azizi Jalalian FR, Salehi R, et al. Preparation and characterization of PLGA-β-CD polymeric nanoparticles containing methotrexate and evaluation of their effects on T47D cell line. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45:432–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aberoumandi SM, Mohammadhosseini M, Abasi E, et al. An update on applications of nanostructured drug delivery systems in cancer therapy. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;45:1058–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt I, Popescu C, Wortmann F-J, et al. Mechanics versus thermodynamics: swelling in multiple-temperature-sensitive core–shell microgels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2006;45:1081–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi M, Shojaei S, Safa KD, et al. Biocompatible magnetic tris(2-aminoethyl)amine functionalized nanocrystalline cellulose as a novel nanocarrier for anticancer drug delivery of methotrexate. New J Chem. 2017;41:2160–2168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercole F, Davis TP, Evans RA. Photo-responsive systems and biomaterials: photochromic polymers, light-triggered self-assembly, surface modification, fluorescence modulation and beyond. Polym Chem. 2010;1:37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batrakova EV, Kabanov AV. Pluronic block copolymers: evolution of drug delivery concept from inert nanocarriers to biological response modifiers. J Control Release. 2008;130:98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulijn RV. Enzyme-responsive materials: a new class of smart biomaterials. J Mater Chem. 2006;16:2217–2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SI, Bae YH. A sulfonamide based glucose-responsive hydrogel with covalently immobilized glucose oxidase and catalase. J Control Release. 2003;86:115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazmi F, Salehi R, Alizadeh E, et al. pH-Controlled multiple-drug delivery by a novel antibacterial nanocomposite for combination therapy. RSC Adv. 2015;5:105678–105691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao GH, Li Y, Lee DS. Environmental pH-sensitive polymeric micelles for cancer diagnosis and targeted therapy. J Control Release. 2013;169:180–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davaran S, Akbarzadeh A, Nejati-Koshki K, et al. In vitro studies of NIPAAM-MAA-VP copolymer-coated magnetic nanoparticles for controlled anticancer drug release. JEAS. 2013;108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Huang G, Gao J, Hu Z, et al. Controlled drug release from hydrogel nanoparticle networks. J Control Release. 2004;94:303–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo S, Xu J, Zhu Z, et al. Phase transition behavior of unimolecular micelles with thermoresponsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) coronas. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:9132–9139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Chen W-Q, Chang C, et al. Synthesis of star block, thermosensitive poly(l-lactide)-star block-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N-hydroxymethylacrylamide) copolymers and their self-assembled micelles for controlled release. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:2888–2894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Qi T, Liao J, et al. Controlled release of cisplatin from pH-thermal dual responsive nanogels. Biomaterials. 2013;34:8726–8740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurd K, Khandagi AA, Davaran S, et al. Cisplatin release from dual-responsive magnetic nanocomposites. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;44:1031–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanjickal D, Lopina S, Evancho-Chapman MM, et al. Improving delivery of hydrophobic drugs from hydrogels through cyclodextrins. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;74:454–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantin M, Bucatariu S, Ascenzi P, et al. Poly(NIPAAm-co-β-cyclodextrin) microgels with drug hosting and temperature-dependent delivery properties. React Funct Polym. 2014;84:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Xu R, Wang W, et al. Thermosensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-glycidyl methacrylate) microgels for controlled drug release. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;101:251–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X-Z, Yang Y-Y, Chung T-S, et al. of Fast response macroporous poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels. Langmuir. 2001;17:6094–6099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeighamian V, Darabi M, Akbarzadeh A, et al. PNIPAAm-MAA nanoparticles as delivery vehicles for curcumin against MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;44:735–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbarzadeh A, Mikaeili H, Zarghami N, et al. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of doxorubicin-loaded Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles modified with biocompatible copolymers. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:511–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J-Z, Du X-J, Mao C-Q, et al. Tailor-made dual pH-sensitive polymer–doxorubicin nanoparticles for efficient anticancer drug delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:17560–17563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Hwang SJ, Han JK, et al. pH-responsive peg-poly(β-amino ester) block copolymer micelles with a sharp transition. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2006;27:447–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song W, Tang Z, Li M, et al. Tunable pH-sensitive poly(β-amino ester)s synthesized from primary amines and diacrylates for intracellular drug delivery. Macromol Biosci. 2012;12:1375–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M, Mardyani S, Chan WCW, et al. Biofunctionalized pH-responsive microgels for cancer cell targeting: rational design. Adv Mater. 2006;18:80–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Wang Z, Li Y, et al. Dual stimuli-responsive N-phthaloylchitosan-graft-(poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-block-poly(acrylic acid)) copolymer prepared via RAFT polymerization. Carbohyd Polym. 2013;92:662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya D, Behera B, Sahu SK, et al. Design of dual stimuli responsive polymer modified magnetic nanoparticles for targeted anti-cancer drug delivery and enhanced MR imaging. New J Chem. 2016;40:545–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su S, Wang H, Liu X, et al. iRGD-coupled responsive fluorescent nanogel for targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2013;34:3523–3533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davaran S, Alimirzalu S, Nejati-Koshki K, et al. Physicochemical characteristics of Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposites based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) for anti-cancer drug delivery. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:49–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang S, Zhou Y, Sun W. Preparation and characterization of antifouling thermosensitive magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29:1196–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff AJ, Brown SD, Holden MR, et al. Cisplatin drug delivery using gold-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for enhanced tumour targeting with external magnetic fields. Inorg Chim Acta. 2012;393:328–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim E, Lee K, Huh Y-M, et al. Magnetic nanocomplexes and the physiological challenges associated with their use for cancer imaging and therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1:729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chen H, Xu L, et al. The targeted behavior of thermally responsive nanohydrogel evaluated by NIR system in mouse model. J Control Release. 2008;131:34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Ahmadov IS, Kadirov SG. Two types of kinetics of membrane potential of water plant leaves illuminated by ultraviolet light. Bioelectrochemistry. 2002;58:189–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Khomutov GB, Tikhonov AN. Effect of ultraviolet radiation on structural-functional characteristics of the thylakoid membrane. Russian Plant Physiol. 1993;3:338–342.
   Google Scholar
• Youssef NA, Gurbanov EM, Haciyeva SR, et al. Antioxidant enzymes, fluctuating asymmetry and morphological changes of urban trees as an ecological indicator of heavy metal stress. Int J Pharm Sci Health Care. 2013;1:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Nasibova AN, Serezhenkov VA, et al. Accumulation of magnetic nanoparticles in plants grown on soils of Apsheron peninsula. Biophysics. 2011;56:316–322.
   Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Akhmetov IS, Goldfeld MG. Binary response of the membrane-potential in the leaf-cells of vallisneria spiralis on pulsed UV excitation. Doklady Akad Nauk. 1992;4:850–852.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfeld MG, Timofeev VP, Khalilov RI. Effect of orientation in a magnetic-field on the ESR-II signal shape in photosynthetic systems. Doklady Akad Nauk SSSR. 1979;1:235–237.
   Google Scholar
• Rovshan K, Aygun N. The use of EPR signals of plants as bioindicative parametersin the study of environmental pollution. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7:172–175.
   Google Scholar