A potential dermal substitute using decellularized dermis extracellular matrix derived bio-ink

References

• Ji S, Guvendiren M. Recent advances in bio-ink design for 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5:23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, et al. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;40:103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, et al. Bio-inks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci. 2018;6:915–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, et al. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bio-ink. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi S, Ding F, Gong L, et al. Extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Cscr. 2017;12:233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skardal A, Devarasetty M, Kang HW, et al. A hydrogel bio-ink toolkit for mimicking native tissue biochemical and mechanical properties in bioprinted tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 2015;25:24–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Pawelek P, Grinnell F. Extracellular matrix organization modulates fibroblast growth and growth factor responsiveness. Exp Cell Res. 1989;182:572–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinnell F. Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:362–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science. 2009;324:1673–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao HW, Li SB, Sun WQ, et al. Quantification of alpha-gal antigen removal in the porcine dermal tissue by alpha-galactosidase. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015;21:1197–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu D, Hanna KR, LeGallo RD, et al. Comparison of histological characteristics of acellular dermal matrix capsules to surrounding breast capsules in acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:485–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah RG, DeVore D, Silver FH. Biomechanical analysis of decellularized dermis and skin: initial in vivo observations using optical cohesion tomography and vibrational analysis. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106:1421–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn G, Min KH, Kim C, et al. Precise stacking of decellularized extracellular matrix based 3D cell-laden constructs by a 3D cell printing system equipped with heating modules. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane TJ, Londono R, Turner NJ, et al. Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response. Biomaterials. 2012;33:1771–1781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane TJ, Swinehart IT, Badylak SF. Methods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance. Methods. 2015;84:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Liu Y, Xia W, et al. Age-dependent alterations of decorin glycosaminoglycans in human skin. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson KG, Baribault H, Holmes DF, et al. Targeted disruption of decorin leads to abnormal collagen fibril morphology and skin fragility. J Cell Biol. 1997;136:729–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Pati F, Choi YJ, et al. Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:233–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datar A, Joshi P, Lee MY. Biocompatible hydrogels for microarray cell printing and encapsulation. Biosensors (Basel). 2015;5:647–663.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koohestani F, Braundmeier AG, Mahdian A, et al. Extracellular matrix collagen alters cell proliferation and cell cycle progression of human uterine leiomyoma smooth muscle cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoganson DM, O’Doherty EM, Owens GE, et al. The retention of extracellular matrix proteins and angiogenic and mitogenic cytokines in a decellularized porcine dermis. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6730–6737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, et al. Bio-ink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2016;8:032002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BS, Kwon YW, Kong JS, et al. 3D cell printing of in vitro stabilized skin model and in vivo pre-vascularized skin patch using tissue-specific extracellular matrix bio-ink: a step towards advanced skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2018;168:38–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medalie DA, Eming SA, Collins ME, et al. Differences in dermal analogs influence subsequent pigmentation, epidermal differentiation, basement membrane, and rete ridge formation of transplanted composite skin grafts. Transplantation. 1997;64:454–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal N, Andriani F, Pfeiffer L, et al. The basement membrane microenvironment directs the normalization and survival of bioengineered human skin equivalents. Matrix Biol. 2008;27:163–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachelor M, Binder RL, Cambron RT, et al. Transcriptional profiling of epidermal barrier formation in vitro. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;73:187–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimann M, Bono E, Annaheim H, et al. Standardized 3D bioprinting of soft tissue models with human primary cells. J Lab Autom. 2016;21:496–509.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar