Improved flowing behaviour and gas exchange of stored red blood cells by a compound porous structure

References

• García-Roa M, Del CV-AM, Bobes AM, et al. Red blood cell storage time and transfusion: current practice, concerns and future perspectives. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:222–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remy KE, Spinella PC. Red blood cell storage age – what we know from clinical trials. Exp Rev Hematol. 2016;9:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Sharma P, Tyler LN. Transfusion of blood and blood products: indications and complications. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83:719–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancelas JA, Dumont LJ, Maes LA, et al. Additive solution-7 reduces the red blood cell cold storage lesion. Transfusion. 2015;55:491–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess JR, Rugg N, Knapp AD, et al. Successful storage of RBCs for 9 weeks in a new additive solution. Transfusion. 2000;40:1007–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimrin AB, Hess JR. Current issues relating to the transfusion of stored red blood cells. Vox Sang. 2009;96:93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Alessandro A, Kriebardis AG, Rinalducci S, et al. An update on red blood cell storage lesions, as gleaned through biochemistry and omics technologies. Transfusion. 2015;55:205–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunskill SJ, Wilkinson KL, Doree C, et al. Transfusion of fresher versus older red blood cells for all conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5:CD010801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hod EA, Godbey EA. The outsider adverse event in transfusion: inflammation. Presse Medicale. 2016;45:e325–e329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Watering L. Red cell storage and prognosis. Vox Sang. 2011;100:36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Packard RR, Hsiai TK. Blood flow modulation of vascular dynamics. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2015;26:376–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abkarian M, Faivre M, Viallat A. Swinging of red blood cells under shear flow. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:188302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TM. Tank-tread frequency of the red cell membrane: dependence on the viscosity of the suspending medium. Biophys J. 2007;93:2553–2561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piiper J. Respiratory gas exchange at lungs, gills and tissues: mechanisms and adjustments. J Exp Biol. 1982;100:5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsia CCW, Hyde DM, Weibel ER. Lung structure and the intrinsic challenges of gas exchange. Compr Physiol. 2016;6:827–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SJ, Kwon TH, Im H, et al. A polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sponge for the selective absorption of oil from water. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2011;3:4552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmo JR. Porosity and pore size distribution. Encyclopedia of soils in the environment. London, Elsevier; 2004. P. 295–303.
   Google Scholar
• Maciaszek JL, Andemariam B, Lykotrafitis G. Microelasticity of red blood cells in sickle cell disease. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2011;46:368–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng L, Feng J, Sun Q, et al. Nanomechanical clues from morphologically normal cervical squamous cells could improve cervical cancer screening. Nanoscale. 2015;7:15589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt HJ, Cappella B, Kappl M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: Technique, interpretation and applications. Surface Science Reports. 2005;59:1–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer S, Gaikwad RM, Subba-Rao V, et al. Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells. Nat Nanotech. 2009;4:389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmacher M, Fritz M, Hansma PK. Imaging soft samples with the atomic force microscope: gelatin in water and propanol. Biophys J. 1995;69:264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Alessandro A, Liumbruno G, Grazzini G, et al. Red blood cell storage: the story so far. Blood Transfus. 2010;8:82–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei C, Yu B, Shahid M, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide attenuates the adverse effects of transfusing stored syngeneic erythrocytes in mice with endothelial dysfunction after hemorrhagic shock. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:1190–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lm VDW, Brand A. Effects of storage of red cells. Transfus Med Hemother. 2008;35:359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams F, Bellairs G, Bird AR, et al. Biochemical storage lesions occurring in nonirradiated and irradiated red blood cells: a brief review. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:968302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parshuram CS, Joffe AR. Prospective study of potassium-associated acute transfusion events in pediatric intensive care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003;4:65–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeow N, Tabor RF, Garnier G. Atomic force microscopy: from red blood cells to immunohaematology. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;249:149–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov I, Dokukin ME, Guz NV. Method for quantitative measurements of the elastic modulus of biological cells in AFM indentation experiments. Methods. 2013;60:202–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova TG, Starodubtseva MN, Yegorenkov NI, et al. Atomic force microscopy probing of cell elasticity. Micron. 2007;38:824–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmacher M, Fritz M, Kacher CM, et al. Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. Biophys J. 1996;70:556–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross SE, Jin YS, Rao J, et al. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nat Nanotech. 2007;2:780–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai X, Xing X, Cai J, et al. Connection between biomechanics and cytoskeleton structure of lymphocyte and Jurkat cells: an AFM study. Micron. 2010;41:257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domke J, Dannöhl S, Parak WJ, et al. Substrate dependent differences in morphology and elasticity of living osteoblasts investigated by atomic force microscopy. Colloids & Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2000;19:367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon A, Cohen-Bouhacina T, Porté MC, et al. Characterization of dynamic cellular adhesion of osteoblasts using atomic force microscopy. Cytometry. 2003;54A:36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Takai E, Costa KD, Shaheen A, et al. Osteoblast elastic modulus measured by atomic force microscopy is substrate dependent. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:963–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulińska I, Targosz M, Strojny W, et al. Stiffness of normal and pathological erythrocytes studied by means of atomic force microscopy. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2006;66:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciasca G, Papi M, Di CS, et al. Mapping viscoelastic properties of healthy and pathological red blood cells at the nanoscale level. Nanoscale. 2015;7:17030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girasole M, Dinarelli S, Boumis G. Structural, morphological and nanomechanical characterisation of intermediate states in the ageing of erythrocytes. J Mol Recognit. 2012;25:285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremmell KE, Evans A, Prestidge CA. Deformation and nano-rheology of red blood cells: an AFM investigation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2006;50:43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciaszek JL, Lykotrafitis G. Sickle cell trait human erythrocytes are significantly stiffer than normal. J Biomech. 2011;44:657–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Xing X. Detection of erythrocytes influenced by aging and type 2 diabetes using atomic force microscope. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;391:1698–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekka M, Fornal M, Pyka-Fościak G, et al. Erythrocyte stiffness probed using atomic force microscope. Biorheology. 2005;42:307–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamzin IM, Khayrullin RM. The quality assessment of stored red blood cells probed using atomic-force microscopy. Anat Res Int. 2014;2014:869683.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li M, Liu L, Xi N, et al. Atomic force microscopy imaging and mechanical properties measurement of red blood cells and aggressive cancer cells. Sci China Life Sci. 2012;55:968–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont LJ, D'Alessandro A, Szczepiorkowski ZM, et al. Yoshida, CO2-dependent metabolic modulation in red blood cells stored under anaerobic conditions. Transfusion. 2016;56:392–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skardal A, Murphy SV, Devarasetty M, et al. Multi-tissue interactions in an integrated three-tissue organ-on-a-chip platform. Sci Rep. 2017;8:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• An F, Qu Y, Liu X, et al. Organ-on-a-chip: new platform for biological analysis. Anal Chem Insights. 2015;10:ACI.S28905–ACI.S28907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsara M, Kontziampasis D, Agbulut O, et al. Heart on a chip micro-nanofabrication and microfluidics steering the future of cardiac tissue engineering. Microelectron Eng. 2019;203–204:44–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bein A, Shin W, Jalili-Firoozinezhad S, et al. Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip models of human intestine. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;5:659–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melin J, Quake SR. Microfluidic large-scale integration: the evolution of design rules for biological automation. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2007;36:213–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halldorsson S, Lucumi E, Gómez-Sjöberg R, et al. Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;63:218–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata A, Fleischman AJ, Roy S. Characterization of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) properties for biomedical micro/nanosystems. Biomed Microdevices. 2005;7–4: 281–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer BM, Shi M, Edd JF, et al. A microfluidic cell co-culture platform with a liquid fluorocarbon separator. Biomed Microdevices. 2014;16:311–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar