Synergistic effects of polyaniline and pulsed electromagnetic field to stem cells osteogenic differentiation on polyvinylidene fluoride scaffold

References

• Neel EAA, Chrzanowski W, Salih VM, et al. Tissue engineering in dentistry. J Dent. 2014;42:915–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulino P, Costa A, Chiaravalloti E, et al. Muscle extracellular matrix scaffold is a multipotent environment. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12:336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paduano F, Marrelli M, Alom N, et al. Decellularized bone extracellular matrix and human dental pulp stem cells as a construct for bone regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polym. 2017;28:730–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Srivastava D, Grover S, et al. Biomaterials in tooth tissue engineering: a review. JCDR. 2014;8:309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacob J, More N, Kalia K, et al. Piezoelectric smart biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Inflamm Regener. 2018;38:2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutmacher DW. Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues—state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci Polym. 2001;12:107–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardeshirylajimi A. Applied induced pluripotent stem cells in combination with biomaterials in bone tissue engineering. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118:3034–3042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG. Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:1197–1211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ribeiro C, Correia DM, Rodrigues I, et al. In vivo demonstration of the suitability of piezoelectric stimuli for bone reparation. Mater Lett. 2017;209:118–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Ounaies Z, Bushnell DM. Piezoelectric polymers. Ueberschlag P. PVDF piezoelectric polymer. Sensor Review. 2001;21:118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Huang W-S, Humphrey BD, MacDiarmid AG. Polyaniline, a novel conducting polymer. Morphology and chemistry of its oxidation and reduction in aqueous electrolytes. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans 1. 1986;82:2385–2400.
   Google Scholar
• Saliev T, Mustapova Z, Kulsharova G, et al. Therapeutic potential of electromagnetic fields for tissue engineering and wound healing. Cell Prolif. 2014;47:485–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad JB, Obolensky AG, Shinnick P. The biologic effects and the therapeutic mechanism of action of electric and electromagnetic field stimulation on bone and cartilage: new findings and a review of earlier work. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13:485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatullo M, Marrelli M, Shakesheff KM, et al. Dental pulp stem cells: function, isolation and applications in regenerative medicine. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9:1205–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardeshirylajimi A, Ghaderian S-H, Omrani MD, et al. Biomimetic scaffold containing PVDF nanofibers with sustained TGF-β release in combination with AT-MSCs for bladder tissue engineering. Gene. 2018;676:195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaie Z, Ardeshirylajimi A, Ashkezari MD. Improved anticancer properties of stem cells derived exosomes by prolonged release from PCL nanofibrous structure. Gene. 2018;665:105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saburi E, Atabati H, Kabiri L, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein‐7 incorporated polycaprolactone scaffold has a great potential to improve survival and proliferation rate of the human embryonic kidney cells. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:9859–9868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardeshirylajimi A, Soleimani M. Enhanced growth and osteogenic differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells by extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field. Cell Mol Biol. 2015;61:36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini FS, Soleimanifar F, Aidun A, et al. Poly (3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) improved osteogenic differentiation of the human induced pluripotent stem cells while considered as an artificial extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:11537–11544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini FS, Soleimanifar F, Khojasteh A, et al. Promoting osteogenic differentiation of human‐induced pluripotent stem cells by releasing Wnt/β‐catenin signaling activator from the nanofibers. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:6339–6346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd JB, Gullane PJ, Rotstein LE, et al. Classification of mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:1266–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abukawa H, Shin M, Williams WB, et al. Reconstruction of mandibular defects with autologous tissue-engineered bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:601–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström J, Brånemark P-I, Albrektsson T. Mandibular reconstruction using the preformed autologous bone graft. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;15:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer GJ, de Bruijn JD, Koole R, et al. Cell based bone tissue engineering in jaw defects. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3053–3061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Abukawa H, Troulis MJ, et al. Tissue engineered hybrid tooth–bone constructs. Methods. 2009;47:122–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao JJ, Giannobile WV, Helms JA, et al. Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells. J Dent Res. 2006;85:966–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagur‐Grodzinski J. Polymers for tissue engineering, medical devices, and regenerative medicine. Concise general review of recent studies. Polym Advan Technol. 2006;17:395–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak JM, Bishop AE. Stem cells and tissue engineering: past, present, and future. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1068:352–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion NW, Mao JJ. Mesenchymal stem cells and tissue engineering. Meth Enzymol. 2006;420:339–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paduano F, Marrelli M, Amantea M, et al. Adipose tissue as a strategic source of mesenchymal stem cells in bone regeneration: a topical review on the most promising craniomaxillofacial applications. IJMS. 2017;18:2140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueberschlag P. PVDF piezoelectric polymer. Sensor Rev. 2001;21:118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Roth S. Conducting polymers-present state of physical understanding. MSF. 1989;42:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Egusa H, Sonoyama W, Nishimura M, et al. Stem cells in dentistry-part I: stem cell sources. J Prosthodont Res. 2012;56:151–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orimo H. The mechanism of mineralization and the role of alkaline phosphatase in health and disease. J Nippon Med Sch. 2010;77:4–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai MT, Li WJ, Tuan RS, et al. Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells by specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1169–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjmand M, Ardeshirylajimi A, Maghsoudi H, et al. Osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on nanofibrous scaffold improved in the presence of pulsed electromagnetic field. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:1061–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardeshirylajimi A, Khojasteh A. Synergism of electrospun nanofibers and pulsed electromagnetic field on osteogenic differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Asaio J. 2018;64:253–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenforde TS. Cellular and molecular pathways of extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic field interactions with living systems. Richland, WA (United States): Pacific Northwest Lab; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Funk RHW, Monsees T, Özkucur N. Electromagnetic effects – from cell biology to medicine. Prog Histochem Cytochem. 2009;43:177–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar