Optimization of design parameters of a limited angle torque motor using analytical hierarchy process and axiomatic design theory

References

• Aguarón, J., & Maria Moreno-Jiménez, J. (2003). The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds. European Journal of Operational Research, 147, 137–145.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00255-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, J., Cook, W. D., & Golany, B. (1987). Consistent weights for judgements matrices of the relative importance of alternatives. Operations Research Letters, 6, 131–134.10.1016/0167-6377(87)90026-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, J., & Golany, B. (1994). AHP rank reversal, normalization and aggregation rules. Journal of INFOR, 32, 57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. A. (2011). Axiomatic design applied to a practical example of the integrity of shaft surfaces for rotating lip seals. Procedia Engineering, 19, 53–59.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.079
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Arsenyan, J., & Ruan, D. (2012). Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 142–153.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2010a). Indicator design for passenger car using fuzzy axiomatic design principles. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 6470–6481.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2010b). Extension of axiomatic design principles under fuzzy environment. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2682–2689.10.1016/j.eswa.2009.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, M., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy axiomatic design based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 599–615.10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogger, K. O., & Yu, P. L. (1985). Eigen weight vectors and least distance approximation for revealed preference in pair wise weight ratios. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 46, 483–491.10.1007/BF00939153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichtner, J. (1983). Some thoughts about the mathematics of the analytic hierarchy process. Munich: Hochschule der Bundeswehr Munchen.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves-Coelho, A. M., & Mourão, A. (2007). Axiomatic design as support for decision-making in a design for manufacturing context: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 109, 81–89.10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, G., & Lee, S. (2007). Design evaluation of emergency core cooling systems using axiomatic design. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, 38–46.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 211–228.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Balkenborg, D., & Kaplan, T. (2011). Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 700–710.10.1057/jors.2010.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14336–14345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizakaa, A., Pearmana, C., & Nemery, P. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis, 50, 4767–4784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Application of axiomatic design principle: A literature review. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 6705–6717.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., & Kahraman, C. (2005a). Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 95, 415–424.10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., & Kahraman, C. (2005b). Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 170, 191–210.10.1016/j.ins.2004.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, S., & Helander, M. G. (2007). Use of axiomatic design principles for analysing the complexity of human- machine systems. Journal of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 47–169.
   Google Scholar
• Matta, D. T. (2012). Application of axiomatic design principles to control complexity dynamics in a mixed-model assembly system: A case analysis. International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis, 50, 1850–1861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittle, V. N., & Mittal, A. (1996). Design of electrical machines (4th ed.). Delhi: Standard Publishers Distributors.
   Google Scholar
• Podvezkoa, V., & Sivilevičius, H. (2013). The use of AHP and rank correlation methods for determining the significance of the interaction between the elements of a transport system having a strong influence on traffic safety. Journal of Transport, Taylor & Francis, 28, 389–403.
   Google Scholar
• Pyrhönen, J., Jokinen, T., Hrabovcová, V. (2008). Design of rotating electrical machines. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/9780470740095
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 156–160.10.1016/0377-2217(90)90073-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85–91.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic, Z., Samardzic, M., & Srdjevic, B. (2012). Robustness of AHP in selecting wastewater treatment method for the coloured metal industry: Serbian case study. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, Taylor & Francis, 29, 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. (1990). The principles of design. New York, NY: Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. (2001). Axiomatic design: Advances and applications. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C., Lin, S., Huang, H., & Cheng, Y. (2009). Design and control of a brushless DC limited-angle torque motor with its application to fuel control of small-scale gas turbine engines. Journal of Mechatronics, 19, 29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1–29.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdowson, G. P., Howe, D., & Evison, P. R. (1991). Computer-aided optimization of rare-earth permanent magnet actuators (pp. 93–96). Computation in Electromagnetics, London.
   Google Scholar
• Zarandi, R. N., MeshginKelk, H., Toorani, F., & Farahmandzad, H. (2011). Comprehensive design of a toroidally-wound limited angle torque motor. Journal of International Review of Electrical Engineering (I.R.E.E.), 6, 198–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar