Minimizing gap of utility between consumer and producer in a duopoly market considering outsourcing decision, price, and product tolerance

References

• Bae, S. H., Yoo, C. S., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Outsourcing with quality competition: insights from a three-stage game-theoretic model. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzell, R. D., Gale, B. T., & Sultan, R. G. M. (1975). Market share – a key to profitability. Harvard Business Review, 53, 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, K. (2005). Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environmental & Resource Economics, 31, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampes, C., & Hollander, A. (1995). Duopoly and quality standards. European Economy Review, 39, 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, J.-F., Hong, I.-H., & Lin, J.-M. (2014). The Cournot production game with multiple firms under an ambiguous decision environment. Information Sciences, 266, 186–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwicahyani, A. R., Rosyidi, C. N., & Pujiyanto, E. (2018). An integrated consumer-manufacturer optimization model to determine the optimal product price and quality level using theory of utility. Proceeding of International Conference Engineering and Engineering Management, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H. (2003). Principles of microeconomics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz, J. J., & Thisse, J. F. (1979). Price competition, quality, and income disparities. Journal of Economic Theory, 20, 340–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M., Li, L., & Samet, D. (1989). Bertrand competition with subcontracting. RAND Journal of Economics, 20(4), 553–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, L. R., & Padmanaban, K. P. (2015). Optimal manufacturing cost and quality loss by reciprocal exponential cost-tolerance function. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 766–767, 1097–1102.
   Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., & Tedeschi, P. (2007). Would you like to enter first with a low-quality good. Bulletin of Economic Research, 59(3), 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J., & Milgrom, P. (2004). Consumer theory. Stanford: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, P.-C. (2008). A note on market coverage in vertical differentiation models with fixed costs. Bulletin of Economic Research, 60(1), 26–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locascio, A., & Thurston, D. L. (1998). Transforming the house of quality to a multiobjective optimization formulation. Structural Optimisation, 16, 136–146.
   Google Scholar
• Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economy Theory, 18, 301–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabin, M. H., Nguyen, X., Sgro, P. M., & Chao, -C.-C. (2014). Strategic quality competition, mixed oligopoly and privatization. International Review of Economics & Finance, 34, 142–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H. (2006). Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 14, 115–157.
   Google Scholar
• Ronnen, U. (1991). Minimum quality standard, fixed costs, and competition. Rand Journal of Economy, 22(4), 490–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosyidi, C. N. (2012). Model penentuan nilai target functional requirement berbasis utilitas [Utility-based functional requirement target determination model]. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 14(1), 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rosyidi, C. N., Irianto, D., Cakravastia, A., & Toha, I. S. (2008). Utility based optimization model for deriving optimum target of functional requirements. Proceeding of the 9th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference (APIEMS), Bali, Indonesia, 2068–2073.
   Google Scholar
• Rosyidi, C. N., Irianto, D., Cakravastia, A., Toha, I. S., & Hamada, K. (2014). Optimization models for deriving optimum target of key characteristis. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 13(2), 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Shy, O., & Stenbacka, R. (2004). Partial outsourcing, monitoring cost, and market structure. Canadian Journal of Economics, 38(4), 1173–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H.-X., Li, Y., & Wang, F. (2015). The optimum output quantity for different competitive behaviors under a fuzzy decision environment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C., Liu, Z., Wu, D. D., & Chen, X. (2018). Cournot game with incomplete information based on rank-dependent utility theory under a fuzzy environment. International Journal of Production Research, 56(5), 1789–1805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C., Yi, W., & Chen, X. (2018). Bertrand game under a fuzzy environment. Journal of Intelligent & ^Fuzzy Systems, 34, 2611–2624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenot, H. J., Steva, E. D., Okudan, G. E., & Simpson, T. W. (2007). A multiattribute utility theory-based method for product line selection. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 1179–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, T., Xia, Y., & Zhang, G. P. (2014). Strategic outsourcing decisions for manufacturers competing on product quality. IIE Transactions, 46(4), 313–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia, N. U., & Sohail, M. (2016). Factors effecting consumer brand preferences in automobile industry. Singaporean Journal of Business, Economy, and Management Study, 5(3), 55–65.
   Google Scholar