MSDD 10.0: a design pattern for sustainable manufacturing systems

References

• Altshuller, G. (1999). The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation, and technical creativity. Technical Innovation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J Temple. (1991). Design of the Factory with a Future. McGraw-Hill. 978-0070055506.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. T., & Hunter, S. L. (2003). Lean manufacturing systems and cell design. Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Boston Consulting Group. 2015. Industry 4.0: the future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/engineered_products_project_business_industry_4_future_productivity_growth_manufacturing_industries
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. A. (2020). Axiomatic design for products, processes, and systems. In D. T. Matt, V. Modrák, & H. Zsifkovits (Eds.), Industry 4.0 for SMEs: challenges, opportunities and requirements (pp. 383–401). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buede, D. (2000). The engineering design of systems: models and methods (1st) ed.). Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, D. S. (2010). Enterprise engineering, creating sustainable systems with Collective System Design – Part II. The Journal of Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability in Systems Engineering, Spring Journal, 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, D. S., Arinez, J., Duda, J. W., & Linck, J. (2001). A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design. SME Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 20(6), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(01)80058-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, D. S., & Dobbs, D. C. (2001). Evaluating manufacturing system design and performance using the manufacturing system design decomposition approach. SME Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 20(6), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(01)80059-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, D. S., Hendricks, S., Barnes, J., & Bi, Z. (2016). Extension of manufacturing system design decomposition to implement manufacturing systems that are sustainable. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 138(10). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034303
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, D., & Rauch, E. (2020). Sustainable enterprise design 4.0: addressing industry 4.0 technologies from the perspective of sustainability. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1237–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.173
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, D. S., Smith, J., Mark, B. G., & Rauch, E. (2022). Information model to advance explainable AI-Based decision support systems in manufacturing system design. In D. T. Matt, R. Vidoni, E. Rauch, & P. Dallasega (Eds.), Managing and Implementing the Digital Transformation (pp. 49–60). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2015). The more things change: Value creation, value capture, and the Internet of Things. Deloitte Review, (17). https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-17/value-creation-value-capture-internet-of-things.html
   Google Scholar
• Durmusoglu, M. B., & Satoglu, S. I. (2011). Axiomatic design of hybrid manufacturing systems in erratic demand conditions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(17), 5231–5261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.510487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, J. A. (2009). Exploiting decision-to-requirements traceability. Briefing to NDIA CMMI conference, Denver, CO (US), 9 November (NDIA).
   Google Scholar
• Foley, J. T., & Cochran, D. S. (2017). Manufacturing system design decomposition: an ontology for data analytics and system design evaluation. 27th CIRP design conference, procedia CIRP, Vol. 60, pp. 175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Gebala, D. A., & Suh, N. P. (1992). An application of axiomatic design. Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580517
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. H., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1979). Link manufacturing process and product lifecycles. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1979/01/link-manufacturing-process-and-product-life-cycles
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2011). Factory Physics (3rd) ed.). Waveland Pr Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ilanković, N., Zelić, A., Miklós, G., & Szabó, L. (2020). Smart factories - the product of industry 4.0. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 7, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.31570/Prosp_2020_01_2
   Google Scholar
• INCOSE. (2015). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities, version 4.0. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• INCOSE. 2021. Systems engineering vision 2035 – engineering solutions for a better world. https://www.incose.org/about-systems-engineering/se-vision-2035
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC 26580. 2021. Software and systems engineering - Methods and tools for the feature-based approach to software and systems product line engineering. https://www.iso.org/standard/43139.html
   Google Scholar
• Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Lukas, W. (2011). Industry 4.0: On the road to the fourth industrial revolution with the Internet of Things. https://www.dfki.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DFKI/Medien/News_Media/Presse/Presse-Highlights/vdinach2011a13-ind4.0-Internet-Dinge.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kane, G., Phillips, A., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. (2019). “The Technology Fallacy” – How people are the real key to digital transformation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., Durmusoglu, M. B., & Tufekci, S. (2005). A complete cellular manufacturing system design methodology based on axiomatic design principles. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48(4), 765–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2004.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, J., Wang, D., Shen, W., Li, X., Liu, Q., & Chen, X. (2021). Digital twins-based smart manufacturing system design in Industry 4.0: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonza, P., & Fitch, J. A. (2012). Decision Management (DM) as the engine for scalable, cross-domain systems engineering. Paper presented at 22nd annual international symposium of the international council on systems engineering, Rome, Italy, 9-12 July 22. INCOSE.
   Google Scholar
• Mendonza, P., & Fitch, J. A. (2013). Integrating system models around decisions. Paper presented at 23rd annual international symposium of the international council on systems engineering, Philadelphia, PA (US), 24-26 June 23. INCOSE.
   Google Scholar
• Object Management Group., 2019. OMG system modeling language, version 1.6. https://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, A. L., Ferreira, J. V., & Barceló, J. (2012). Model-based systems engineering: an emerging approach for modern systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 42(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2106495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, E., & Brown, C. (2021). Teaching axiomatic design for a long-term sustainable introduction of industry 4.0 in SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 96, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.155
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, E., & Vickery, A. R. (2020). Systematic analysis of needs and requirements for the design of smart manufacturing systems in SMEs. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 7(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwaa012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J., & Roy, R. (2015). A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Procedia CIRP, 37, 30–35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827115009403
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S. 2019. Using the Collective System Design Approach to Facilitate a Sustainable Manufacturing System. Purdue University Graduate School. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.25394/PGS.7438727.v1
   Google Scholar
• Shevchenko, N. (2020). An introduction to Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). Carnegie Mellon University: Software Engineering Institute Blog. https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/blog/introduction-model-based-systems-engineering-mbse/
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V., & Willcox, K. E. (2018). Engineering design with digital thread. AIAA Journal, 56(11), 4515–4528. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Shah, S., & Cochran, D. S. (2018). Prevention, early detection, and reversal of type-2 diabetes using Collective System Design. The 12th International Conference on Axiomatic Design - ICAD 2018, Reykjavik University, Iceland. Vol. 223 (pp. 01018). MATEC.
   Google Scholar
• Sobek, D. K., & Ward, A. C. (1996). Principles from Toyota’s set-based concurrent engineering process. Proceedings of the 1996 ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers in engineering conference. California, US. pp 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Soffer, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 Initiatives are Failing—Here’s Why. Seebo Blog. https://blog.seebo.com/why-industry-4-0-projects-fail/
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. (1990). The principles of design. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. (2001). Axiomatic design – advances and applications. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P., Cochran, D. S., & Lima, P. C. (1998). Manufacturing system design. 48th general assembly of CIRP, CIRP annals – manufacturing technology, Vol. 47, pp. 627–639.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. K. (2013). A classification of procedural errors in the definition of functional requirements in axiomatic design theory,” 7th International Conference on Axiomatic Design (ICAD 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Vitech GENESYS. GENESYS Software. 2021. https://www.vitechcorp.com/genesys/
   Google Scholar
• Vitech GENESYS. (2022). GENESYS Excel Connector. https://vitechcorp.com/software-downloads/
   Google Scholar