Approach for the implementation of resource analysis methods in learning factories

References

• Abele, E. (2016). Learning factory. In L. Laperrière & G. Reinhart (Eds.), The internationalInternational Academy for production engineering (Vol. 32, pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35950-7_16828-1
   Google Scholar
• Abualfaraa, W., Salonitis, K., Al-Ashaab, A., & Ala’raj, M. (2020). Lean-green manufacturing practices and their link with sustainability: A critical review. Sustainability, 12(3), 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Airasian, P. W. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, A., Günther, E., & Kara, S. (2017). Resource efficiency and an integral framework for performance measurement. Sustainable Development, 25(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhner, J., Scholz, M., Franke, J., & Sauer, A. (2018). Integrating digitization technologies into resource efficiency driven industrial learning environments. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.158
   Google Scholar
• Cao, H., & Folan, P. (2012). Product life cycle: The evolution of a paradigm and literature review from 1950–2009. Production Planning & Control, 23(8), 641–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.577460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, H. A. (1963) The method of paired comparisons Kendall, M. G. In Griffin’s statistical monographs and courses. 2. ed rev Vol. 41 Oxford Univ. Press; Griffin 1–124.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (DIN). (2011). Environmental management – material flow cost accounting – general framework. Beuth Verlag GmbH. DIN EN ISO 14051.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (DIN). (2019a-). 02 Treibhausgase - Carbon Footprint von Produkten - Anforderungen an und Leitlinien für Quantifizierung DIN EN ISO 14067Beuth Verlag GmbH https://www.beuth.de/de/norm/din-en-iso-14067/289443505.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (DIN). (2019b-). 06 Treibhausgase - Teil 1: Spezifikation mit Anleitung zur quantitativen Bestimmung und Berichterstattung von Treibhausgasemissionen und Entzug von Treibhausgasen auf Organisationsebene DIN EN ISO 14064-1Beuth Verlag GmbH https://www.beuth.de/de/norm/din-en-iso-14064-1/291289049.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (DIN). (2021a). Umweltmanagement – Ökobilanz – Anforderungen und Anleitungen. Beuth Verlag. DIN EN ISO 14044.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (DIN). (2021b). Umweltmanagement – Ökobilanz – Grundsätze und Rahmenbedingungen. Beuth Verlag. DIN EN ISO 14040.
   Google Scholar
• Doch, S., Merker, S., GmbH Berlin, I. T. C. L., Straube, F., & Roy, D. (2015). Aufbau und Umsetzung einer Lernfabrik : Produktionsnahe Lean-Weiterbildung in der Prozess- und Pharmaindustrie. Industrie 4.0 Management, 26–30.ecoinvent. (2021, December 12). ecoinvent Database. https://ecoinvent.org/the-ecoinvent-database/
   Google Scholar
• Enke, J. (2019). Methodik zur multidimensionalen reifegradbasierten Entwicklung von Lernfabriken für die Produktion [ Dissertation]. TU Darmstadt,
   Google Scholar
• Erlach, K. (2013). Energy value stream: Increasing energy efficiency in production. In G. Schuh, R. Neugebauer, & E. Uhlmann (Eds.), Future trends in production engineering (pp. 343–349). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24491-9_34
   Google Scholar
• Gräßler, I., Pöhler, A., & Pottebaum, J. (2016). Creation of a learning factory for cyber physical production systems. Procedia CIRP, 54, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.063
   Google Scholar
• Institut für Umweltinformatik. (2022). Umberto: Die Ressourceneffizienz-Software Umberto Efficiency+. https://www.ifu.com/de/umberto/oekobilanz-software/
   Google Scholar
• International Association of Learning Factories. (2021). Definition of “learning factory”. https://ialf-online.net
   Google Scholar
• Karre, H., Hammer, M., Kleindienst, M., & Ramsauer, C. (2017). Transition towards an industry 4.0 state of the LeanLab at Graz University of Technology. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Katunsky, D., Korjenic, A., Katunska, J., Lopusniak, M., Korjenic, S., & Doroudiani, S. (2013). Analysis of thermal energy demand and saving in industrial buildings: A case study in Slovakia. Building and Environment, 67, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishita, Y., Low, B. H., Fukushige, S., Umeda, Y., Suzuki, A., & Kawabe, T. (2010). Checklist-based assessment methodology for sustainable design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9). Article 091011 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreß, A., Wuchterl, S., & Metternich, J. (2022). Design approaches for learning factories – review and evaluation. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3857880
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., Thiede, S., Kara, S., & Herrmann, C. (2017). A generic sankey tool for evaluating energy value stream in manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP, 61, 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.174
   Google Scholar
• Plorin, D., Jentsch, D., Hopf, H., & Müller, E. (2015). Advanced Learning Factory (aLF) – Method, Implementation and Evaluation. Procedia CIRP, 32, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.115
   Google Scholar
• Posselt, G. (2016). Towards Energy Transparent Factories. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20869-5
   Google Scholar
• PTW TU Darmstadt. (2022). Prozesslernfabrik CiP - Center für industrielle Produktivität. https://www.prozesslernfabrik.de/
   Google Scholar
• Riemann, T., & Metternich, J. (2022). Virtual reality supported trainings for lean education: Conceptualization, design and evaluation of competency-oriented teaching-learning environments. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-04-2022-0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2020). CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C., Li, W., Thiede, S., Kara, S., & Herrmann, C. (2015). A methodology for customized prediction of energy consumption in manufacturing industries. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-015-0021-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M., & Nakajima, M. (2013). Material flow cost accounting as an approach to improve resource efficiency in manufacturing companies. Resources, 2(3), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2030358
   Google Scholar
• Schuhmacher, J., & Hummel, V. (2016). Decentralized control of logistic processes in cyber-physical production systems at the example of esb logistics learning factory. Procedia CIRP, 54, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.095
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (2000). The logic and methodology of checklists. Western Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2004). The greenhouse gas protocol: A corporate accounting and reporting standard (Rev. ed.). World Resources Institute; World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Thiede, S. (2012). Energy efficiency in manufacturing systems. In Sustainable Production, life cycle engineering and management ser (1st ed.). Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=973962
   Google Scholar
• Thiede, S., Juraschek, M., & Herrmann, C. (2016). Implementing cyber-physical production systems in learning factories. Procedia CIRP, 54, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.098
   Google Scholar
• Thiede, B., Mindt, N., Mennenga, M., & Herrmann, C. (2022). Creating a hybrid multi-user learning experience by enhancing learning factories using interactive 3d-environments. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4074712
   Google Scholar
• Tisch, M., Hertle, C., Abele, E., Metternich, J., & Tenberg, R. (2015). Learning factory design: A competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(12), 1355–1375. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1033017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisch, M., Hertle, C., Cachay, J., Abele, E., Metternich, J., & Tenberg, R. (2013). A Systematic Approach on Developing Action-oriented, Competency-based Learning Factories. Procedia CIRP, 7, 580–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.036
   Google Scholar
• Tisch, M., & Metternich, J. (2017). Potentials and Limits of Learning Factories in Research, Innovation Transfer, Education, and Training. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.027
   Google Scholar
• Umweltbundesamt (Ed.). (2001) . Handbuch Umweltcontrolling. Erw. Auflage). Vahlen.
   Google Scholar
• VDI Zentrum Ressourceneffizienz. (2021, October 26). Instrumente VDI 4801. https://www.ressource-deutschland.de/instrumente/instrumente-vdi-4801/
   Google Scholar
• Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI). (2012). VDI 4600 - Cumulative energy demand (KEA): Terms, definitions, methods of calculation. Beuth Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI). 02. 2016 VDI 4800 Part 1 - Resource efficiency: Methodological principles and strategies (VDI 4800 Blatt 1) Beuth Verlag GmbH
   Google Scholar
• Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI). (2018). VDI 4800 - Resource efficiency: Evaluation of raw material demand. Beuth Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Weyand, A., Rommel, C., Zeulner, J., Sossenheimer, J., Weigold, M., & Abele, E. (2021). Method to increase resource efficiency in production with the use of MFCA. Procedia CIRP, 98, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.101
   Google Scholar
• Weyand, A., Schmitt, S., Petruschke, L., Elserafi, G., & Weigold, M. (2021). Approach for Implementing New Topics in Learning Factories – Application of Product-specific Carbon Footprint Analysis. SSRN Journal (SSRN Electronic Journal), Proceedings of the Conference on Learning Factories (CLF). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3863447
   Google Scholar
• Weyand, A., Thiede, S., Mangers, J., Plapper, P., Ketenci, A., Wolf, M., Panagiotopoulou, V. C., Stavropoulos, P., Köppe, G., Gries, T., & Weigold, M. (2022). Sustainability and Circular Economy in Learning Factories – Case Studies. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4080162
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. C. (2008). A Definition of ‘Carbon Footprint' Pertsova, C. C. In C. C. Pertsova, Ecological Economics Research Trends: Chapter 1 (pp. 1–11). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar