265
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Cochlear implant versus hearing aids: cortical auditory-evoked potentials study

&

References

  • Byrne D, Parkinson A, Newall P. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. Ear Hear. 1990;11:40–49.
  • Ching T, Dillon H, Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:1128–1140.
  • Moore B. Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Ampl. 2001;5:1–34.
  • Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear. 2004;25:9–21.
  • Mo B, Lindbaek M, Harris S, et al. Social hearing measured with the performance inventory for profound and severe loss: a comparison between adult multichannel cochlear implant patients and users of acoustical hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2004a;43:572–578.
  • Mo B, Harris S, Lindbaek M. Cochlear implants and health status: a comparison with other hearing-impaired patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004b;113:914–921.
  • Hamzavi J, Franz P, Baumgartner WD, et al. Hearing performance in noise of cochlear implant patients versus severely-profoundly hearing-impaired patients with hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2001;40:26–31.
  • Kewley-Port D. Time-varying features as correlates of place of articulation in stop consonants. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983;73:322–335.
  • Weir C, Hawkey R, Green A, et al. The cognitive processes underlying the academic reading construct as measured by IELTS. IELTS Res Rep. 2009;9:157–189.
  • Flynn M, Schmidtke T. Four fitting issues for severe or profound hearing impairment. Hear Rev. 2002;9:28–33.
  • Gulick L, Gescheider G, Frisina R. Hearing: physiological acoustics, neural coding, and psychoacoustics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989. p. 161–187.
  • Humes L. Spectral and temporal resolution by the hearing impaired. In: Studebaker GA, Bess F, editors. The Vanderbilt hearing aid report. Monographs in contemporary audiology. Upper Darby (PA): York Publisher; 1982. p. 16–31.
  • Novak MA, Firszt JB, Rotz LA, et al. Cochlear implants in infants and toddlers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109:46–49.
  • Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Lento CL, et al. Effects of age at implantation in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111:69–73.
  • Sharma A, Martin K, Roland P, et al. P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16:564–573.
  • Eggermont JJ, Ponton CW, Don M, et al. Maturational delays in cortical evoked potentials in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997;117:161–163.
  • Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee TJ, et al. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104:540–545.
  • Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ. A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear Hear. 2002b;23:532–539.
  • Moore JK, Linthicum FH Jr. The human auditory system: a timeline of development. Int J Audiol. 2007;46:460–478.
  • Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ. Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation. Neuroreport. 2002a;13:1365–1368.
  • Dorman MF, Sharma A, Gilley P, et al. Central auditory development: evidence from CAEP measurements in children fitted with cochlear implants. J Commun Disord. 2007;40:284–294.
  • Moore B. A sound foundation through early amplification. Atlanta (GA): PHONAK; 2001. Chapter 12, Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for the choice of high-frequency amplification. p. 153–166. Available from: www.phonakpro.com/content/dam/phonak/b2b/Events/conference_proceedings/2nd_pediatricconference_2001/2001proceedings_chapter12.pdf
  • Lee DS, Lee JS, Oh SH, et al. Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature. 2001;409: 149–150.
  • Sharma A, Gilley PM, Dorman MF, et al. Deprivation-induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2007;46:494–499.
  • Kral A, Tillein J, Heid S, et al. Cochlear implants: cortical plasticity in congenital deprivation. Progr Brain Res. 2006;157:283–313.
  • Kral A, Eggermont JJ. What’s to lose and what’s to learn: development under auditory deprivation, cochlear implants and limits of cortical plasticity. Brain Res Rev. 2007;56:259–269.
  • Geers AE. Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:50–65.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.