Organisational identification and decision-making use of decoupled performance measurement systems

References

• Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers' turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1027–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, S., Ashforth, B.E., & Dutton, J.E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (1996). Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 5, 487–508.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F.A. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B.E., & Johnson, S.A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In M.A. Hogg & D.J. Terry (Eds.), Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (pp. 31–48) (Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J.R., & Tompkins, P.K. (1994). Identification in the self-managing organization characteristics of target and tenure. Human Communication Research, 21, 223–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M.B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this ‘We'? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickson, S. (2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 82–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullis, C.A., & Tompkins, P.K. (1989). The forest ranger revisited: A study of control practices and identification. Communication Monographs, 56, 287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, J., & Scapens, R.W. (2000). Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Busco, C., Giovannoni, E., & Scapens, R.W. (2008). Managing the tensions in integrating global organisations: The role of performance management systems. Management Accounting Research, 19, 103–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busco, C., Frigo, M. L., Giovannoni, E., Riccaboni, A., & Scapens, R. W. (2006). Integrating global organizations through performance measurement systems. Strategic Finance, 87, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., Paik, Y., & Park, S.H. (2009). Host-country policies and MNE management control in IJVs: Evidence from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 526–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, RH. (2006). Theorizing contingencies in management control systems research. In CS. Chapman, AG. Hopwood, & D.S Michael (Eds.), Handbooks of management accounting research 1, (pp. 163–205). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R.H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Accounting Review, 61(1), 16–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, C.W., Duh, R.-R., & Xiao, J.Z. (2007). Management accounting practices in the People's Republic of China. In C.S. Chapman, A.G. Hopwood, & D.S. Michael (Eds.), Handbook of management accounting research 2 (pp. 923–967). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Christ, O., Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2003). When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organisational identification as determinants of different forms of organisational citizenship behaviour among schoolteachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, J. B., Davis, E. W., Emmanuel, C. R., Longden, S. G., & Stacey, R. J. (1992). Multinational companies performance measurement systems: international perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 3, 133–150.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, I., Major, M., & Scapens, R.W. (2009). Institutionalization and practice variation in the management control of a global/local setting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(1), 91–117.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1995). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces. New York: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., & Christian, L.M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Michigan: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dossi, A., & Patelli, L. (2008). The decision-influencing use of performance measurement systems in relationships between headquarters and subsidiaries. Management Accounting Research, 19, 126–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossi, A., & Patelli, L. (2010). You learn from what you measure: financial and non-financial performance measures in multinational companies. Long Range Planning, 43, 498–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukerich, J.M., Golden, B.R., & Shortell, S.M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 507–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M., & Harquail, C.V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, D.M., Chow, C.W., & Chen, G. (2009). Strategy, performance-measurement systems, and performance: A study of Chinese firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 44, 256–278.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesl, M., & Silberzahn, R. (2012). Challenges in establishing global collaboration: Temporal, strategic and operational decoupling. Long Range Planning, 45, 160–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, P.J., & Christensen, L.J. (2011). Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business & Society, 50, 315–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2005). One foot in each camp: The dual identification of contract workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C.A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. The Academy of Management Review, 15, 603–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, L.A., & Narayanan, V.K. (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), 33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøgaard, B. (2012). Alignment of strategy and structure in international firms: An empirical examination. International Business Review, 21, 397–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Prentice Hall Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Haldma, T., & Lääts, K. (2002). Contingencies influencing the management accounting practices of Estonian manufacturing companies. Management Accounting Research, 13, 379–400.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, H.H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. (2000). An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S.A. (2004). Psychology in organisations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, S.A., Powell, C., & Turner, J.C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization, and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organisational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri, J.-F. (2006). Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(1), 77–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing (AIM), 20, 277–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2007). Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24, 411–420.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M., & Kantor, J. (2005). The development of quality management accounting practices in China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20, 707–724.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.D., et al. (2006). Multiple professional identities: Examining differences in identification across work-related targets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2004). Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization, 11(1), 149–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, M., & Hassel, L. (1998). The joint impact of environmental uncertainty and tolerance of ambiguity on top managers' perceptions of the usefulness of non-conventional management accounting information. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14, 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Legris, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 40(3), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipponen, J., Helkama, K., & Juslin, M. (2003). Subgroup identification, superordinate identification and intergroup bias between the subgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 239–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukka, K. (2007). Management accounting change and stability: Loosely coupled rules and routines in action. Management Accounting Research, 18(1), 76–101.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., & Park, S.H. (2001). Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MNCs in China. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael, F.A., & Ashforth, B.E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael, F.A., & Ashforth, B.E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael, F.A., & Tetrick, L.E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlendorf, M. D., Rehring, J., Schäffer, U., & Wyszomirski, E. (2012). Influencing foreign subsidiary decisions through headquarter performance measurement systems. Management Decision, 50, 688–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L., & Pfeffer, J. (1983). Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8, 205–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, Z. (2007). Cultural analysis of the management accounting application in China. Journal of Modern Accounting & Auditing, 3, 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2001). Performance measurement and institutional processes: A study of managerial responses to public sector reform. Management Accounting Research, 12, 437–464.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkkonen, M.-E., & Lipponen, J. (2006). Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 202–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, J.D., & Weick, K.E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, E.R.G., & Sudzina, F. (2012). Which firms use measures?: Internal and external factors shaping the adoption of performance measurement systems in Danish firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), 4–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravishankar, M.N., & Pan, S.L. (2008). The influence of organizational identification on organizational knowledge management (KM). Omega, 36, 221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reade, C. (2001a). Dual identification in multinational corporations: Local managers and their psychological attachment to the subsidiary versus the global organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 405–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reade, C. (2001b). Antecedents of organizational identification in multinational corporations: Fostering psychological attachment to the local subsidiary and the global organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 1269–1291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C.M., & Spreen, F. (2007). Beurteilung der Ergebnisse von PLS-Pfadanalysen. Das Wirtschaftsstudium, 36, 211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Saadé, R.G. (2007). Dimensions of perceived usefulness: Toward enhanced assessment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5, 289–310.
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, A., & Beamish, P.W. (2011). Performance effects of MNC headquarters–subsidiary conflict and the role of boundary spanners: The case of headquarter initiative rejection. Journal of International Management, 17, 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S.G., & Lane, V.R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siti-Nabiha, A.K., & Scapens, R.W. (2005). Stability and change: an institutionalist study of management accounting change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(1), 44–73.
   Google Scholar
• Sosik, J.J., Kahai, S.S., & Piovoso, M.J. (2009). Silver bullet or voodoo statistics?: A primer for using the partial least squares data analytic technique in group and organization research. Group & Organization Management, 34(1), 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieker, M. (2004). Entscheidungsverhalten in Gründerteams. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information/sur les sciences sociales, 13, 65–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1978). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Oxford: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., et al. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, J. (2001). The impact of culture on the relationship between budgetary participation, management accounting systems, and managerial performance: An analysis of Chinese and Western managers. The International Journal of Accounting, 36(2), 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge MA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 207–226.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R. (2001). Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R., Grojean, M. W., Christ, O., & Wieseke, J. (2006). Identity and the extra mile: Relationships between organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviour. British Journal of Management, 17, 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., & van Schie, E.C.M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, E., van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 679–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vora, D., & Kostova, T. (2007). A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 327–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vora, D., Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2005). Antecedents of dual organizational identification among MNC subsidiary managers an empirical test. Honolulu, Hawaii: Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Vora, D., Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2007). Roles of subsidiary managers in multinational corporations: The effect of dual organizational identification. Management International Review, 47, 595–620.
   Google Scholar
• Wieseke, J., Kraus, F., Ahearne, M., & Mikolon, S. (2012). Multiple Identification Foci and Their Countervailing Effects on Salespeople's Negative Headquarters Stereotypes. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Y.T. (2001). The Chinese at work: collectivism or individualism? Hong Kong Institute of Business Studies, 40(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, R.-S. (1988). On Hofstede's treatment of Chinese and Japanese values. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 6(1), 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., George, J.M., & Chan, T.-S. (2006). The paradox of dueling identities: The case of local senior executives in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of Management, 32, 400–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobel, PJ. (2000). Cultural relevance of the organizational identification construct in China: The case of foreign enterprises. Universiteit Leiden.
   Google Scholar