Auditor subgroup status and audit quality

References

• Brown, A.D., & Starkey, K. (2000). Organizational identity and organizational learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25, 102–120.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q. (2016). Auditor group, inter-group interaction and financial statement comparability: Evidence from audit firm mergers in China. China Accounting and Finance Review, 18, 131–198.
   Google Scholar
• Carton, A.M., & Cummings, J.N. (2012). A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Review, 37, 441–470.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.C., & Chen, X.P. (2009). Negative externalities of close guanxi within organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26, 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Clogg, C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M.D., & Stephan, W.G. (2011). Electromyographic analyses of responses to intergroup threat. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 196–218.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, B.A, & Dirks, K.T. (2012). Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: Implications of asymmetry and dissensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 391–406. doi:10.1037/a0026483
   Google Scholar
• Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G., and Sweeney, A.P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70, 193–225.
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., & Subramanyam, K. (1998). Auditor changes and discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25, 35–67.
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58, 275–326.
   Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice lower threat and greater trust as mediators. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 223–237.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M., & Harquail, C.V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.
   Google Scholar
• Empson, L. (2000). Mergers between professional service firms: Exploring an undirected process of integration. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 1, 205–237.
   Google Scholar
• Empson, L. (2001). Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination: Impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional services firms. Human Relations: Special Issue on Knowledge Management in Professional Service Firms, 54, 839–862.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crises. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 327–349.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J.R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30, 125–152.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J.R., Pinnuck, M.L., & Watanabe, O. (2014). Auditor style and financial statement comparability. The Accounting Review, 89, 605–633.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, R., Johnson, M., & Nelson, K. (2002) The relation between auditors’ fee for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77, 71–105.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K.G. (2000). Organizational identity: Image and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25, 63–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.
   Google Scholar
• Homan, A.C., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G.A., & De Dreu, C.K. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189–1199.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M.J., & Hogg, M.A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (1993). Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psychological Record, 43, 395–414.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K.A., & Bezrukova, K. (2010). The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 24–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 193–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, A.A., Argote, L., & Levine, J.M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effective of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 96, 56–71.
   Google Scholar
• Koschate, M., & Van Dick, R. (2011). A multilevel test of Allport’s contact conditions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 769–787.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, S., Leone, A., & Wasley, C. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 163–197.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, T., Brazel, J., & Jones, K. (2008). Unintended consequences of accelerated filings: Do mandatory reductions in audit delay lead to reductions in earnings quality. Working Paper, Drexel University.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, D.C., & Murnighan, J.K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Leondardelli, G.J., & Tormala, Z.L. (2003). The negative impact of perceiving discrimination on collective well-being: The mediating role of perceived ingroup status. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 507–514.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., & Song, Y.H. (2010). Is the timely accounting information disclosed in annual report reliable? Management World, 9, 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Hambrick, D.C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794–813.
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, R.K., & Wilson, T.D. (2010). Increasing positive intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 382–387.
   Google Scholar
• Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I.C. (2010). Top management teams in Family-Controlled companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘Faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 205–222.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J., Myers, L., & Omer, T. (2003). Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation. The Accounting Review, 78, 779–799.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M.B., & Mortensen, M. (2010). Go (con) figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21, 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Paolini, S., Harwood, J., & Rubin, M. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723–1738.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T.F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 411–425.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K.W., Mannix, E.A., Neale, M.A., & Gruenfeld, D.H. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497–510.
   Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M.L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685–695.
   Google Scholar
• Riek, B.M., Mania, E.W., Gaertner, S.L., McDonald, S.A., & Lamoreaux, M.J. (2010). Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 403–423.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, W.G., and Stephan, C.W. (2000). An integrated theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.). Reducing prejudice and discrimination: The Claremont Symposium on applied social psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of inter -group relations. Chapters 1–3. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tom, D. (2006). Effects of perceived discrimination: Rejection and identification as two distinct pathways and their associated effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. (1995). Sense making in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, X.Y., Zhang X.Z., & Wang, W.L. (2012). Review of subgroup relationship research under team background. Foreign Economics & Management, 10, 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Feng, J.P., & Wang, E.P. (2009). The classification of intergroup threat and the effect of threat on prejudice. Advances in Psychological Science, 2, 473–480.
   Google Scholar