Has the prose quality of science textbook improved over the past decade? A linguistic perspective

References

• Altbach, P., G. Kelly, H. Petrie, and L. Weis, eds. 1991. Textbooks in American Society: Politics, Policy, and Pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armbruster, B. (1988). “Why Some Children Have Trouble Reading Content Area Textbooks.” A Reading Research and Education Center Report, Center for the study of Reading. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79586-7.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley, S., M. E. King-Sears, B. L. Hott, and K. Bradley-Black. 2014. “Are History Textbooks More “Considerate” after 20 Years?” Journal of Special Education 47 (4): 217–230. doi:10.1177/0022466912436813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braker-Walters, B. A. 2014. “Informational Text and the Common Core: A Content Analysis of Three Basal Reading Programs.” SAGE Open 1–8. doi:10.1177/2158244014555119.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, D., and E. Hiebert. 2010. “If I Follow the Teachers’ Editions, Isn’t that Enough? Analyzing Reading Volume in Six Core Reading Programs.” Elementary School Journal 110: 347–363. doi:10.1086/648982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. 1987. “Introduction (To Special Issue on “Basal Readers in American Reading Instruction”).” The Elementary School Journal 87 (3): 243–245. doi:10.1086/461492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhansha, S., and M. J. Schleppegrell. 1998. “Linguistic Features of Middle School Environment Education Texts.” Environment Education Research 4 (1): 53–66. doi:10.1080/1350462980040104.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. 2nd ed. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. 2016. “Text Complexity in the US Common Core State Standards: A Linguistic Critique.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 39 (3): 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., and M. J. Schleppegrell. 2008. Reading in Secondary Content Areas: A Language-Based Pedagogy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, D. A., X. Lu, and S. A. Eckert. 2013. “Challenging the Research Base of the Common Core State Standards: A Historical Reanalysis of Text Complexity.” Education Researcher 42 (7): 381–391. doi:10.3102/0013189X13505684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. “Some Grammatical Problems in Scientific English.” In The Language of Science, edited by J. Webster, 159–180. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2007. Language and Education, edited by J. Webster. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and C. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. P., L. T. Wolfer, and M. F. Wolfe. 1996. “Schoolbook Simplification and Its Relation to the Decline in SAT-verbal Scores.” American Educational Research Journal 33: 489–508. doi:10.3102/00028312033002489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, W. 2004. “Choosing Science Textbooks: Connecting Research to Common Sense.” In Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice, edited by E. W. Saul, 383–394. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. 2008. “Race, Social Class, and Student Engagement in Middle School English Classrooms.” Social Science Research 37: 434–448. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesidou, S., and J. Roseman. 2002. “How Well Do Middle School Science Programs Measure Up? Findings from Project 2061’s Curriculum Review.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 522–529. doi:10.1002/tea.10035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. 2009. “An Analysis of Misconceptions in Science Textbooks: Earth Science in England and Wales.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (5): 565–601. doi:10.1080/09500690902721681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. H., and P. M. Chandler. 2003. “Where Is the Inquiry in Biology Textbooks?” The American Biology Teacher 65 (7): 485–487. doi:10.2307/4451546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. T. 2002. Living in the Environment: Principles, Connections, and Solutions. 12th ed. Behmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. T. 2004. Living in the Environment: Principles, Connections, and Solutions. 13th ed. Behmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. T. 2005. Living in the Environment: Principles, Connections, and Solutions. 14th ed. Behmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. T. 2007. Living in the Environment: Principles, Connections, and Solutions. 15th ed. Behmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. T., and S. E. Spoolman. 2009. Living in the Environment: Concepts, Connections, and Solutions. 16th ed. Behmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. T., and S. E. Spoolman. 2011. Living in the Environment: Principles, Connections, and Solutions. 17th ed. Behmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. T., and S. E. Spoolman. 2014. Living in the Environment. 18th ed. Behmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, B. 2008. “The Information Text Gap: The Mismatch between Non-Narrative Text Types in Basal Readers and 2009 NAEP Recommended Guidelines.” Journal of Literacy Research 40: 201–219. doi:10.1080/10862960802411927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, J. E., L. Stern, and M. Koppal. 2010. “A Method for Analyzing the Coherence of High School Biology Textbooks.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (1): 47–70. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., X. Lu, D. Baker, M. Ray, S. Eckert, and D. Gamson. 2015. “Assessing the Cognitive Demands of a Century of Reading Curricula: An Analysis of Reading Text and Comprehension Tasks from 1910 to 2000.” American Educational Research Journal 52 (3): 582–617. doi:10.3102/0002831215573531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. L. 1987. “A History of the American Reading Textbook.” The Elementary School Journal 87 (3): 246–265. doi:10.1086/461493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, S. E., and E. B. Moje. 2000. “The Role of Text in Classroom Learning.” In The Handbook of Research on Reading. III vols., edited by M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, R. Barr, and P. D. Pearson, 609–627. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar