Global policy convergence through “distributed governance”? The emergence of “national” education standards in the US and Germany

References

• Adick, C. (2009). World Polity – ein Forschungsprogramm und Theorierahmen zur Erklärung weltweiter Bildungsentwicklungen [World polity – a research agenda and theoretical framework for the explanation of global educational transformations]. In S. Koch & M. Schemmann (Eds.), Neo-Institutionalismus in der Erziehungswissenschaft [Neo-institutionalism in educational research] (pp. 258–291). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, L., Wiggs, M. D., & Briggs, D. (2012). Navigating assessment and collaboration with the Common Core State Standards. Englewood, CO: The Leadership and Learning Center.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, J., & Nikolai, R. (2010). Bildungs-und Sozialpolitik: Die zwei Seiten des Sozialstaats im internationalen Vergleich [Education and social policy. Two sides of the social state compared internationally]. Soziale Welt, 61, 105–119. doi: 10.5771/0038-6073-2010-2-105
   Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H., Brüsemeister, T., & Wissinger, J. (2007). Educational governance: Handlungskoordination und Steuerung im Bildungssystem [Educational governance: Coordination and management in the educational system]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. G., & Guillemard, A.-M. (2005). Conclusion: Policy change, welfare regimes and active citizenship. In J. G. Andersen, A.-M. Guillemard, P. H. Jensen, & B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), The changing face of welfare: Consequences and outcomes from a citizenship perspective (pp. 257–271). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. (2007). Congress and the classroom: From the cold war to “no child left behind”. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W., Ball, S. J., & Gandin, L. A. (2010). The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Artelt, C., & Riecke-Baulecke, T. (2004). Bildungsstandards. Fakten, Hintergründe, Tipps [Educational standards. Facts, background, guidance]. München: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1998). Postmodernity and the fragmentation of welfare (pp. 187–203). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2007). Education Plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2008). New philanthropy, new networks and new governance in education. Political Studies, 56, 747–765. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00722.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2009a). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the “competition state”. Journal of Education Policy, 24, 83–99. doi: 10.1080/02680930802419474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2009b). Academies in context: Politics, business and philanthropy and heterarchical governance. Management in Education, 3, 100–103. doi: 10.1177/0892020609105801
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2009c). Beyond networks? A brief response to “which networks matter in education governance?” Political Studies, 3, 688–691. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00805.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 85–96. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2013.740678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, J. (2009). Who is strolling through the global garden? International agencies and educational transfer. In R. Cowen, A. M. Kazamias, & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 341–357). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, J. (2005). Pfadabhängigkeit ist nicht gleich Pfadabhängigkeit! [Path dependence is not equally path dependence]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 34, 5–21. doi: 10.1007/s11617-005-0227-5
   Google Scholar
• Bogason, P., & Zølner, M. (2007). Methods for network governance research: An introduction. In P. Bogason & M. Zolner (Eds.), Methods in democratic network governance (pp. 1–20). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Social Theory, 1, 14–25. doi: 10.2307/202060
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2004). The state nobility. Konstanz: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, J. (2014). Reading standards as curriculum: The curricular and cultural politics of the common Core. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 11, 23–25. doi: 10.1080/15505170.2014.907551
   Google Scholar
• Burris, C. C., & Garrity, D. T. (2012). Opening the common core. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Caestle, F. G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H., & Pierson, C. (2010). The Oxford handbook of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59, 341–369. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100020852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., & Rhoten, D. (2002). What does globalization mean for educational change? A comparative approach. Comparative Education Review, 46, 1–9. doi: 10.1086/324053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2, 145–170. doi: 10.3102/01623737023002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, C. T. (2004). From a nation at risk to no child left behind: National education goals and the creation of federal education policy. New York, NY: Teacher College.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. (1999). Specifying globalization effects on national policy: A focus on the mechanisms. Journal of Education Policy, 1, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/026809399286468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, H. (2006). Activation policies and the changing ethical foundations of welfare. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/3784/1/activation_policies_(LSERO).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dean, H. (2007). The ethics of welfare-to-work. Policy & Politics, 35, 573–589. doi: 10.1332/030557307782453029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedering, K. (2010). Entscheidungsfindung in Bildungspolitik und Bildungspraxis [Decisionmaking in educational politics and educational practice]. In H. Altrichter & K. Maag Merki (Eds.), Handbuch neue Steuerung im Schulsystem [Handbook new school governance] (pp. 63–80). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dicke, H., Glismann, H., & Siemßen, S. J. (1994). Vocational training in Germany (Kiel Working Papers, p. 622). Kiel: Institut für Weltwirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditton, H. (2009). Möglichkeiten eines Bildungspanels zur Steuerung im Bildungswesen [Options of an Educational Panel for Educational Governance]. In R. Tippelt (Ed.), Steuerung durch Indikatoren [Governance by indicators] (pp. 127–141). Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelmann, D., & Tippelt, R. (2008). Kompetenzentwicklung in der beruflichen Bildung und Weiterbildung [Competence development in vocational and further education]. In M. Prenzel, I. Gogolin, & H.-H. Krüger (Eds.), Kompetenzdiagnostik [Competence diagnostics] (pp. 129–146). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Esmark, A. (2007). Network management in the EU: The European commission as network manager. In M. Marcussen, & J. Torfling (Eds.), Democratic network governance in Europe (pp. 252–292). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Exley, S., Braun, A., & Ball, S. J. (2011). Global education policy: Networks and flows. Critical Studies in Education, 52, 213–218. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2011.604079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltes, T., & Paysen, M. (2005). Nationale Bildungsstandards. Von der Bildungs- zur Leistungspolitik [National education standards. From education to performance politics]. Hamburg: VSA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fend, H. (2006). Neue Theorie der Schule [New theory of schooling]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. (1993). International organizations as teachers of norms: The United Nations educational, scientific, and cultural organization and science policy. International Organization, 47, 565–597. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitz, J., & Beers, B. (2002). Education management organisations and the privatisation of public education: A cross-national comparison of the USA and Britain. Comparative Education, 2, 137–154. doi: 10.1080/03050060220140548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (2012). Education and the crisis of public values. Challenging the assault on teachers, students, & public education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Graßl, H. (2008). Ökonomisierung der Bildungsproduktion. Zu einer Theorie des Konservativen Bildungsstaats [Economisation in educational production: Towards a theory of the conservative education-state]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Greinert, W.-D. (1994). The “German system” of vocational education. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, E., & Serpieri, R. (2013). Privatising education policy-making in Italy: New governance and the reculturing of a welfarist education state. Education Inquiry, 3. Retrieved from http://www.education-inquiry.net/index.php/edui/article/view/22615
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7, 7–34. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwn020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartong, S. (2012a). Basiskompetenzen statt Bildung? Wie PISA die deutschen Schulen veraendert hat [Basic competences instead of education? How PISA changed schools in Germany]. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Hartong, S. (2012b). Overcoming resistance to change. PISA, school reform in Germany and the example of Lower Saxony. Journal of Educational Policy, 27, 747–760. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2012.672657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartong, S., & Münch, R. (2012). Der Wettlauf um PISA-Punkte: Gewinner, Verlierer, Illusionen [The race for PISA-scores: Winners, losers, illusions]. Paedagogische Korrespondenz, 46, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hartong, S., & Schwabe, U. (2013). Wie “Agenten des Wandels” deutsche Bildungspolitik transformierten – ein integratives Diffusionsmodell für die Prozesse PISA und Bologna [How German education policy is changed by agents of change – an integrative diffusion-model for processes introduced by the PISA- and Bologna-reforms]. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 3, 493–515.
   Google Scholar
• Hega, G. M. (2011). Wohlfahrtsstaaten und Bildungspolitik. Nachzuegler, Vorreiter oder Ausreißer? Die Schweiz und die Vereinigten Staaten invergleichender Perspektive [Welfare states and education policy: Latecomers, pioneers, or outliers? Comparison of Switzerland and the United States]. In J. Schmid, K. Amos, J. Schrader, & A. Thiel (Eds.), Welten der Bildung? [Educational worlds] (pp. 53–99). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Hega, G. M., & Hokenmaier, K. G. (2002). The welfare state and education: A comparison of social and educational policy in advanced industrial societies. German Policy Studies, 1, 143–173.
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., Jörgens, H., & Knill, C. (2007). Transfer, Diffusion und Konvergenz von Politiken [Transfer, diffusion, and convergence in politics]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N. (2002). Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media & Society, 4, 550–574. doi: 10.1177/146144402321466813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobi, A., & Martens, K. (2007). Diffusion durch internationale Organisationen. Die Bildungspolitik der OECD [Diffusion by international organisations. The OECD education policy]. In K. Holzinger, H. Jörgens, & C. Knill (Eds.), Transfer, Diffusion und Konvergenz von Politiken [Transfer, diffusion, and convergence in politics] (pp. 247–70). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, P. H., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Active citizenship: The new face of welfare. In I. J. Goul Andersen, A. M. Guillemard, P. H. Jensen, & B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), The changing face of welfare: Consequences and outcomes from a citizenship perspective (pp. 1–14). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., & Bird, K. (2000). “Partnership” as strategy: Public private relations in education action zones. British Educational Research Journal, 4, 491–506. doi: 10.1080/713651572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaestle, C. F. (2007). Federal education policy and the changing national polity of education, 1957–2007. In C. F. Kaestle, & A. E. Lodewick (Eds.), To educate a nation: Federal and national strategies of school reform (pp. 17–40). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Kato, J. (2003). Regressive taxation and the welfare state: Path dependence and policy diffusion. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirst, M. W. (2004). Turning points: A history of American school governance. In N. Epstein (Ed.), Who’s in charge here? The tangled web of school governance and policy (pp. 14–41). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W., Döbrich, P., Gruber, H., Prenzel, M., … Tenorth, H.-E. (2003). Zur Entwicklung Nationaler Bildungsstandards [The development of national education standards]. Bonn: BMBF.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., & Edelenbos, J. (2007). Meta-governance as network management. In E. Sørensen, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 199–214). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• KMK. (1995). Standards für den Mittleren Schulabschnuss in den Fächern Deutsch, Mathematik und erste Fremdsprache [Standards for the middle school examination in German, Mathematics and first foreign language]. Bonn: Author.
   Google Scholar
• KMK. (1997). Grundsaetzliche Überlegungen zu Leistungsvergleichen innerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland – Konstanzer Beschluss. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 24.10.1997. [Konstanz resolution from Oct 24th, 1997, regarding international student assessment participation]. Bonn: Author.
   Google Scholar
• KMK. (2004). Bildungssteuerung der KMK. Erlaeuterungen zur Konzeption und Entwicklung. [Educational Regulation by the KMK. Explanations about conception and development. München: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• KMK. (2006). Gesamtstrategie der Kultusministerkonferenz zum Bildungsmonitoring [KMK strategy for educational monitoring]. München: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. (2000). Societal governance: Levels, modes, and orders of social-political interaction. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 138–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, P. E. (2010). The Gates foundation and the future of US “public” schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with Ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, L. (2013). Zwang zur freiwilligen Zusammenarbeit. Steuerungsinstrumente und interkanonale Governance in der schweizerischen Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung [Coercion for voluntary cooperation. Steering instruments and intercantonial governance in the Swiss teacher education]. Bern: Hep.
   Google Scholar
• Leuze, K., Rusconi, A., & Martens, K. (2007). New arenas of education governance: The impact of international organizations and markets on educational policy making. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (1997). The lessons of international education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 12, 253–266. doi: 10.1080/0268093970120404
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Ozga, J. (2006). Globalisation, education policy and politics. In B. Lingard & J. Ozga (Eds.), The Routledge reader in education policy and politics (pp. 65–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lütz, S. (2007). Policy-transfer und policy-diffusion [Policy transfer and policy diffusion]. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch governance [Handbook governance] (pp. 132–142). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Maranto, R., & McShane, M. Q. (2012). President Obama and education reform: The personal and the political. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. (2006). Negri, hardt, distributed governance and open source software. Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 1. Retrieved from http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/Article/122
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., Breiter, A., Idel, T.-S., Knipping, C., & Teltemann, J. (2013). Das “PISA Phänomen”: Ein Plädoyer für einen interdisziplinären Ansatz zur Erforschung von Bildungsproduktion im Kontext von Large-Scale-Assessments [The PISA-phenomenon: Addressing an interdisciplinary approach for the analysis of educational production in the context of large-scale-assesssments] (TranState Working Papers, no. 175), Bremen: University of Bremen.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. (2013). The allure of order: High hopes, dashed expectations, and the troubled quest to remake American schooling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merkens, H. (2006). Erziehungswissenschaft und Bildungsforschung [Educational science and education policy research]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H.-D. (2009). Institutionelle Isomorphie und Vielfalt – Zu einer überfälligen Korrektur in der Bildungsforschung [Institutional isomorphy and variety – About an urgent correction in education policy research]. In S. Koch, & M. Schemmann (Eds.), Neo-Institutionalismus in der Erziehungswissenschaft [Neo-institutionalism in educational science] (pp. 292–307). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. (1999). The changing cultural content on the nation state: A world society perspective. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), State/culture. state-formation after the cultural turn (pp. 123–141). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–181. doi: 10.1086/231174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Hannan, M. T. (1976). National development and the world system: Educational, economic, and political change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Krücken, G., & Kuchler, B. (2005). Weltkultur: Wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen [World culture and the penetration of western principles]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 4, 649–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
   Google Scholar
• Miron, G., Urschel, J. L., Mathis, W. J., & Tornquist, E. (2010). Schools without diversity: Education management organizations, charter schools, and the demographic stratification of the American school system. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, K. H. (2011). The quest for regional hub of education: Growing heterarchies, organizational hybridization, and new governance in Singapore and Malaysia. Journal of Education Policy, 1, 61–81. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2010.498900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münch, R. (2009). Globale Eliten, lokale Autoritaeten: Bildung und Wissenschaft unter dem Regime von PISA, McKinsey & Co [Global elites, local authorities: Education and science under the regime of PISA, McKinsey & Co.]. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Munck, R. (2003). Neoliberalism, necessitarianism and alternatives in Latin America: There is no alternative (TINA)? Third World Quarterly, 3, 495–511. doi: 10.1080/0143659032000084438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGA, CCSSO, & Achieve. (2008). Benchmarking for success: Ensuring U.S. students receive a world-class education. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Obinger, H., & Starke, P. (2009). Are welfare states converging? Recent social policy developments in advanced OECD countries. In I. Dingeldey & H. Rothgang (Eds.), Governance of welfare state reform (pp. 113–141). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24, 149–162. doi: 10.1080/02680930902733121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, C. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267. doi: 10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare: Understanding the changing geographies of social welfare provision. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. W., & Solga, H. (2010). Analyzing the nexus of higher education and vocational training in Europe: A comparative-institutional framework. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 705–721. doi: 10.1080/03075070903295829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raidt, T. (2010). Ökonomische Perspektiven auf Bildung–Beobachtungen zu deutschen Widerstaenden [Economic perspectives on education – observations of German resistance]. In H. Barz (Ed.), Handbuch Bildungsfinanzierung [Handbook of educational financing] (pp. 51–59). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). National curricula: World models and national historical legacies. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (1983). The troubled crusade: American education, 1945–1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of battles over school reform. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, R. (2011). Something in common. The common core standards and the next chapter in American education. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Arenas of standardizers. In N. Brunsson, & B. Jacobsson (Eds.), A world of standards (pp. 100–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheja, B. (2006). Der Wandel von Bildungssystemen am Beispiel von Deutschland und Polen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der PISA-Studie [The change of educational systems – an exemplary comparison of Germany and Poland with emphasis on the PISA-study]. Cologne: University of Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. (2006). Die Rolle von Ideen und Deutungsmustern in der Politik: Wissenspolitologische Perspektiven auf Netzwerke [The role of ideas and interpretation patterns in politics: Knowledge perspectives on networks]. In B. Hollstein, & F. Straus (Eds.), Qualitative Netzwerkanalyse [Qualitative network analysis] (pp. 99–123). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, J. (2010). Wohlfahrtsstaaten im Vergleich: Soziale Sicherungssysteme in Europa: Organisation, Finanzierung, Leistungen und Probleme [Welfare states in comparison: Social security in Europe: Organisation, financing, performances and problems]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. B. (2003). The emerging state leadership role in education reform: Notes of a participant observer. In D. T. Gordon (Ed.), A nation reformed? American education after 20 years a nation at risk (pp. 131–151). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2008). The global diffusion of markets and democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 3, 573–596. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloane, P. F., & Dilger, B. (2005). The Competence Clash – Dilemmata bei der Übertragung des “Konzepts der nationalen Bildungsstandards” auf die berufliche Bildung [The competence clash – dilemmas of the adaption of NES in vocational education]. bwp@, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending: Building comparative policy studies. In G. Steiner-Khamsi, & F. Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2000). Think tank transnationalisation and non-profit. Analysis, advice and advocacy. Global Society, 2, 153–172. doi: 10.1080/13600820050008421
   Google Scholar
• Tepe, M. (2007). Die Pfadabhaengigkeitsthese in der vergleichenden Wohlfahrtsstaatenforschung. Eine explorative Clusteranalyse staatlicher Altersvorsorge [Path-dependency theory in comparative welfare analysis. An explorative cluster analysis of public retirement provisions]. In D. Wagner, C. Lattemann, S. Kupke, & A. Legel (Eds.), Governance-theorien oder governance als theorie? [Governance-theories or governance as theory?] (pp. 165–181). Berlin: wvb.
   Google Scholar
• Tillmann, K.-J., Dedering, K., Kneuper, D., Kuhlmann, C., & Nessel, I. (2008). PISA als Bildungspolitisches Ereignis. Fallstudien in vier Bundeslaendern. [Pisa as an education policy event: Case studies of four federal states in Germany]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zanten, A. (2002). Educational change and new cleavages between head teachers, teachers and parents: Global and local perspectives on the French case. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 289–304. doi: 10.1080/02680930210127568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinovskis, M. A. (2009). From a nation at risk to no child left behind: National education goals and the creation of federal education policy. New York, NY: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. (2012). Standardisation and legitimacy: Two central concepts in research on educational borrowing and lending. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 411–427). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wirt, F. M., & Kirst, M. W. (1997). The political dynamics of American education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar