Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Psychology
Revista de Psicología Social
Volume 30, 2015 - Issue 2
1,298
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers / Artículos de Investigación

The social dominance orientation in adolescence: the role of gender identity and stereotypical male and female traits / La orientación a la dominancia social en la adolescencia: el papel de la identidad de género y los rasgos estereotípicos femeninos y masculinos

, &
Pages 241-263 | Received 16 May 2013, Accepted 11 Jun 2014, Published online: 02 Apr 2015

References / Referencias

  • Batalha, L., Reynolds, K. J., & Newbigin, C. (2011). All else being equal: Are men always higher in social dominance orientation than women? European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 796–806. doi:10.1002/ejsp.829
  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215
  • Castillo-Mayén, M. R. (2011). Discriminación de género y dominancia social. Análisis de los estereotipos de género y de la influencia del priming subliminal ( Doctoral Dissertation). Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Jaén, Jaén.
  • Castillo-Mayén, M. R., & Montes-Berges, B. (2007). Escala de estereotipos de género actuales. Iniciación a la investigación, 2, a5.
  • Castillo-Mayén, M. R., & Montes-Berges, B. agosto (2009a) Mediación de la identidad de género en la orientación a la dominancia social XI Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social. Tarragona: Universidad Rovira i Virgili.
  • Castillo-Mayén, M. R., & Montes-Berges, B. agosto (2009b) Auto-asignación de estereotipos de género en mujeres y hombres como predictora de los niveles de dominancia social XI Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social. Tarragona: Universidad Rovira i Virgili.
  • Castillo-Mayén, M. R., & Montes-Berges, B. (2014). Analysis of current gender stereotypes. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1044–1060. doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.2.138981
  • Chatard, A., Guimons, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Desert, M. (2005). Domination masculine et identite de genre/Male domination and Gender Identity. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 67–68, 113–123.
  • Dambrun, M. (2001). Dominance sociale et préjuges: La régulation sociale des cognitions intergroupes (Social dominance and prejudice: The social regulation of intergroup cognitions) ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Laboratoire de psychologie sociale de la cognition, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Dambrun, M., Duarte, S., & Guimond, S. (2004). Why are men more likely to support group-based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 287–297. doi:10.1348/0144666041501714
  • Foels, R., & Pappas, C. J. (2004). Learning and unlearning the myths we are taught: Gender and social dominance orientation. Sex Roles, 50, 743–757. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000029094.25107.d6
  • Fowers, A. F., & Fowers, B. J. (2010). Social dominance and sexual self-schema as moderators of sexist reactions to female subtypes. Sex Roles, 62, 468–480. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9607-7
  • Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejuiced against women? Transaction, 5, 28–30.
  • Huang, L.-L., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 267–276. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.006
  • Kteily, N. S., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2011). Social dominance orientation: Cause or ‘mere effect’? Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 208–214. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.009
  • Lee, I.-C., Pratto, F., & Johnson, B. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029–1064. doi:10.1037/a0025410
  • López-Zafra, E., & López-Sáez, M. (2001). Por qué las mujeres se consideran más o menos femeninas y los hombres más o menos masculinos. Explicaciones sobre su autoconcepto de identidad de género. Revista de Psicología Social, 16, 193–207. doi:10.1174/021347401317351134
  • López-Barajas, D., Ortega, F., Valiente, I., & Zagalaz, M. (2010). Estudio comparativo del autoconcepto físico en adolescentes en función del género y del nivel de actividad físico-deportiva. Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 17, 38–41.
  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006
  • Montes-Berges, B., & Silván-Ferrero, M. P. (2004). Dominancia social y neosexismo: Relación con las actitudes hacia programas de acción afirmativa. Revista de Psicología Social, 19, 275–285. doi:10.1174/0213474041960487
  • Oliva, A. (2007). Adolescencia en positivo. Apuntes de Psicología, 25, 235–237.
  • Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409. doi:10.1177/0022022100031003005
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. doi:10.1080/10463280601055772
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  • Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49–68. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x
  • Pratto, F., & Stewart, A. L. (2012). Group dominance and the half-blindness of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 28–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01734.x
  • Ryan, M. K., David, B., & Reynolds, K. J. (2004). Who cares? The effect of gender and context on the self and moral reasoning. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 246–255. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00142.x
  • Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161–186. doi:10.1348/014466603322127166
  • Schmitt, M. T., & Wirth, J. H. (2009). Evidence that gender differences in social dominance orientation result from gendered self-stereotyping and group-interested responses to patriarchy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 429–436. doi:10.1111/j.14716402.2009.01520.x
  • Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687–696. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
  • Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C. M., & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: A social dominance approach. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307–331). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998–1011. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.998
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845–880. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x
  • Silván-Ferrero, M., & Bustillos, A. (2007). Adaptación de la escala de orientación a la dominancia social al castellano: Validación de la dominancia grupal y la oposición a la igualdad como factores subyacentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 22, 3–15. doi:10.1174/021347407779697485
  • Snellman, A., Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. (2009). The role of gender identification in social dominance orientation: Mediating or moderating the effect of sex? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 999–1012. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00469.x
  • Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and gender (pp. 59–96). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
  • Wilson, M. S., & Liu, J. H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187–198. doi:10.1348/014466603322127175

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.