A systematic social observation tool to measure the restorative potential of urban settings / Diseño de una herramienta de observación social sistemática del potencial restaurador de espacios urbanos

References / Referencias

• Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Benfield, J. A., Bell, P. A., Troup, L. J., & Soderstrom, N. (2010). Does anthropogenic noise in national parks impair memory? Environment and Behavior, 42, 693–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public places urban spaces. The dimensions of urban design. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W., & Curtis, S. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health and Place, 14, 544–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavnar, M. M., Kirtland, K. A., Evans, M. H., Wilson, D. K., Williams, J. E., Mixon, G. M., & Henderson, K. A. (2004). Evaluating the quality of recreation facilities: Development of an assessment tool. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 22(1), 96–114.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, K. J., Livi Smith, A. D., & Rodriguez, D. (2007). The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., & Durrheim, K. (2004). Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 455–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L., Sallis, J., Conway, T., Chapman, J., Saelens, B., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidlow, C., van Kempen, E., Smith, G., Triguero-Mas, M., Kruize, H., Gražulevičienė, R., … Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2018). Development of the natural environment scoring tool (NEST). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 29(April 2017), 322–333.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8, 23–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han, K.-T. (2003). A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 209–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, T. (2004). Restorative environments. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 273–279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., & Chernick, K. K. (2000). Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., & Rector, A. E. (2008). Perceived danger and judged likelihood of restoration. Environment and Behavior, 41, 387–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoehner, C. M., Ivy, A., Ramirez, L. K. B., Handy, S., & Brownson, R. C. (2007). Active neighborhood checklist: A user-friendly and reliable tool for assessing activity-friendliness | Active living research. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21, 534–538. Retrieved from https://activelivingresearch.org/active-neighborhood-checklist-user-friendly-and-reliable-tool-assessing-activity-friendliness
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature. A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., & Silvennoinen, H. (2008). Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health and Place, 14, 636–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006). The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 11, 204–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindal, P. J., & Hartig, T. (2013). Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, E., Corraliza, J. A., Collado, S., & Sevillano, V. (2016). Preference, restorativeness and perceived environmental quality of small urban spaces. Psyecology, 7, 152–177. doi:10.1080/21711976.2016.1149985
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Soto, J., & López-Lena, M. M. (2010). Percepción de cualidades restauradoras y preferencia ambiental. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 27, 183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Menatti, L., & Casado da Rocha, A. (2016). Landscape and health: Connecting psychology, aesthetics and philosophy through the concept of affordance. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 571. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnery, J. R., & Lim, B. (2005). Measuring crime prevention through environmental design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22, 330–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrín, F., Hernández-Fernaud, E., Hess, S., & Hernández, B. (2017). Discrimination of urban spaces with different level of restorativeness based on the original and on a shorter version of Hartig et al.’s perceived restorativeness scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickelson, J., Wang, A. R., Mitchell, Q. P., Hendricks, K., & Paschal, A. (2013). Inventory of the physical environment domains and subdomains measured by neighborhood audit tools: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., & Hartig, T. (2011). Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10, 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschardt, K. K., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, E., Gatersleben, B., & Sowden, P. T. (2016). Associations with bird sounds: How do they relate to perceived restorative potential? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 136–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Juan, C., Subiza-Pérez, M., & Vozmediano, L. (2017, December). Restoration and the city: The role of public urban squares. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer-McDaniel, N., Dunn, J. R., Minian, N., & Katz, D. (2010). Rethinking measurement of neighborhood in the context of health research. Social Science and Medicine, 71, 651–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer-McDaniel, N., O’Brien Caughy, M., O’Campo, P., & Gearey, W. (2010). Examining methodological details of neighbourhood observations and the relationship to health: A literature review. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 277–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, B., Coyle, A., Gatersleben, B., & Ungar, S. (2015). Exploring nature experiences of people with visual impairments. Psyecology, 6, 287–327.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliabitlity. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E. (2005). Visual permeability, locomotive permeability, safety and enclosure. Environment & Behavior, 37, 587–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subiza-Pérez, M., Vozmediano, L., & San Juan, C. (2017). Restoration in urban settings: Pilot adaptation and psychometric properties of two psychological restoration and place bonding scales. Psyecology, 8, 234–255.
   Google Scholar
• Subiza-Pérez, M., Vozmediano, L., & San Juan, C. (in press). Pretest-posttest field studies on psychological restoration: A descriptive review and reflections for the future. Landscape Research, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thwaites, K., Simkins, I., & Mathers, A. (2011). Toward socially restorative urbanism: Exploring social and spatial implications for urban restorative experience. Landscape Review, 13(2), 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S. E. Kellert & E. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valera, S., Pérez-Tejera, F., Anguera, M. T., & Sicilia, L. (2018). Evaluating the uses and environmental characteristics of 40 public parks and squares in Barcelona by means of systematic observation/Evaluación de los usos y características ambientales de 40 parques y plazas en Barcelona mediante observación sistemátic. Psyecology, 9, 118–151.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K., & Green, S. (2001, November). Literature review of public space and local environments for the cross cutting review: Final report. Oxford Centre for Sustainable Development Oxford Brookes University. Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/10358
   Google Scholar