References
- Barca, S., & Delicado, A. (2016). Anti-nuclear mobilisation and environmentalism in Europe: A view from Portugal (1976–1986). Environment and History, 22, 497–520.
- Barke, R. P., & Jenkins‐Smith, H. C. (1993). Politics and scientific expertise: Scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy. Risk Analysis, 13, 425–439.
- Barry, J., & Ellis, G. (2011). Beyond consensus? Agonism, republicanism and a low carbon future. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to participation (pp. 29–42). London: Earthscan.
- Batel, S., & Devine‐Wright, P. (2017). Energy colonialism and the role of the global in local responses to new energy infrastructures in the UK: A critical and exploratory empirical analysis. Antipode, 49, 3–22.
- Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P., & Tangeland, T. (2013). Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion. Energy Policy, 58, 1–5.
- Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P., Wold, L., Egeland, H., Jacobsen, G., & Aas, O. (2015). The role of (de-) essentialisation within siting conflicts: An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 149–159.
- Bernardo, F., & Palma-Oliveira, J. M. (2016). Urban neighbourhoods and intergroup relations: The importance of place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 239–251.
- Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International, 30, 827–840.
- Bickerstaff, K., & Johnstone, P. (2017). The re-scaling of energy politics: UK nuclear facility siting in historical context. In S. Bouzarovski, M. J. Pasqualetti, & V. C. Broto (Eds.), The Routledge research companion to energy geographies (pp. 139–166). London: Routledge.
- Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125–136.
- Caillaud, S., & Flick, U. (2013). New meanings for old habits? Representations of climate change in France and Germany. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 26(3), 39–72.
- Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Over-coming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26, 120–123.
- Cotton, M. (2015). Structure, agency and post-Fukushima nuclear policy: An alliance-context-actantiality model of political change. Journal of Risk Research, 18, 317–332.
- Devine‐Wright, H., & Devine‐Wright, P. (2009). Social representations of electricity network technologies: Exploring processes of anchoring and objectification through the use of visual research methods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 357–373.
- Devine-Wright, P. (2013a). Explaining “NIMBY” objections to a power line: The role of personal, place attachment and project-related factors. Environment and Behavior, 45, 761–781.
- Devine-Wright, P. (2013b). Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global Environmental Change, 23, 61–69.
- Devine-Wright, P., & Devine-Wright, H. (2006). Social representations of intermittency and the shaping of public support for wind energy in the UK. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 25, 243–256.
- Devine-Wright, P., Price, J., & Leviston, Z. (2015). My country or my planet? Exploring the influence of multiple place attachments and ideological beliefs upon climate change attitudes and opinions. Global Environmental Change, 30, 68–79.
- Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Ferreira, M. (2017, 12 de Janeiro). Almaraz. A central nuclear é mesmo uma bomba-relógio? Observador. Retrieved from http://observador.pt/explicadores/almaraz-a-central-nuclear-e-mesmo-uma-bomba-relogio/
- Gregory, R., Slovic, P., & Flynn, J. (1996). Risk perceptions, stigma, and health policy. Health & Place, 2, 213–220.
- Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016). Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174–182.
- Johnstone, P. (2014). Planning reform, rescaling, and the construction of the post-political: The case of the planning act 2008 and nuclear power consultation in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 697–713.
- Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., … Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177–187.
- Lima, M. L. (2006). Predictors of attitudes towards the construction of a waste incinerator: Two case studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 441–466.
- Lima, M. L., Barnett, J., & Vala, J. (2005). Risk perception and technological development at a societal level. Risk Analysis, 25, 1229–1239.
- Malone, E., Hultman, N. E., Anderson, K. L., & Romeiro, V. (2017). Stories about ourselves: How national narratives influence the diffusion of large-scale energy technologies. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 70–76.
- Mannarini, T., Roccato, M., Fedi, A., & Rovere, A. (2009). Six factors fostering protest: Predicting participation in locally unwanted land uses movements. Political Psychology, 30, 895–920.
- Poortinga, W., Aoyagi, M., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2013). Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures before and after the Fukushima accident: A comparison between Britain and Japan. Energy Policy, 62, 1204–1211.
- Renewables Directive. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:en:PDF
- Roccato, M., Mannarini, T., & Pacilli, M. G. (2017). Ingroup identification, outgroup infrahumanization, and intention to mobilize in land use conflicts. Environment and Behavior, 50, 512–534.
- Rootes, C. (2009). Environmental movements, waste and waste infrastructure: An introduction. Environmental Politics, 18, 817–834.
- Rudolph, D., & Kirkegaard, J. K. (2018). Making space for wind farms: Practices of territorial stigmatisation in rural Denmark. Antipode, 51, 642–663.
- Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 1–12.
- Slovic, P., Layman, M., & Flynn, J. H. (1991). Risk perception, trust, and nuclear waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 33, 6–30.
- Thomas, M., Pidgeon, N., Evensen, D., Partridge, T., Hasell, A., Enders, C., … Bradshaw, M. (2017). Public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas and oil in the United States and Canada. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8, e450.
- Walker, G. (2009). Beyond distribution and proximity: Exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode, 41, 614–636.
- Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2009). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 29, 425–437.
- Wolsink, M. (2007). Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy, 35, 2692–2704.
- Zoellner, J., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Wemheuer, C. (2008). Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany. Energy Policy, 36, 4136–4141.