Formative assessment: improvement, immediacy and the edge for learning

References

• Assessment Reform Group. (2002a). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. Retrieved from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (2002b). Testing, motivation, and learning. Cambridge: Assessment Reform Group. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (2002c). Assessment for learning. Beyond the black box. Cambridge: Assessment Reform Group. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014). Looking at classroom practice. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/classroom-practice/looking_at_clasroom_practice_interactive.pdf?sfvrsn=8
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. (2000, September/December). Research and the development of educational assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 26, 407–419.10.1080/713688540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box. Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: Department of Education and Professional Studies, King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–76.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box. Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: Department of Education and Professional Studies, King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. London: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. (2011). Looking at classroom practice. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2014, p. 75.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. (2015). The skilful teacher: On techniques, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. M. (2003). Learner-centred conditions that ensure students’ success in learning. Education. Chula Vista, 124, 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (Eds.). (2000). Discovering and exploring habits of mind. Habits of mind: A developmental series. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Crebbin, W. (2000). Revisioning learning – Contributions of postmodernism, constructivism and neurological research. University of Ballarat. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/00pap/cre00462.htm
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Implementation Unit. (2002). A guide to productive pedagogies. Classroom reflection manual. Brisbane: Teaching and Learning Branch, Education Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Dann, R. (2002). Promoting assessment as learning. Improving the learning process. London: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• de Bono, E. (1995). Mind power: Discover the secrets of creative thinking. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, C. (2002, December). The candidate as arbiter of their own learning. Paper presented at the Annual IVA International Conference, Assuring Assessment Quality, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. J. R., Zeun, P., & Stanier, R. A. (2013). Motivating student learning using a formative assessment journey. Journal of Anatomy, 224, 296–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabler, I. A., & Schroeder, M. (2002). Constructivist methods for the secondary classroom engaged minds. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, D., O’Neill, S., & Petersen, S. (2013, July). Metalanguage: The ‘teacher talk’ of explicit literacy teaching in practice. Improving Schools, 12, 119–129.10.1177/1365480213493707
   Google Scholar
• Harada, V., & Kim, L. (2003). Problem-based instruction makes learning real. Knowledge Quest, 32, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. H. (2003). Education epidemic. Transforming secondary schools through innovative networks. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. New York, NY: Routledge. Cited in Looking at Classroom practice. Interactive pdf. Australian institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2014, p. 18. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/classroom-practice
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, R. (2001). Complexity. Life at the edge of chaos (2nd ed.). London: Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2001). Rich tasks. Keynote address: Middle years of school conference. Melbourne: Edmund Barton.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, W. J. (2003). Constructivism in the classroom: Epistemology, history, and empirical evidence. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30, 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Consultative Committee on Curriculum. (1991). The basics in schooling (Report 3). Brisbane: Queensland Department of Education. Government printer.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? British Education Research Journal, 26, 599–613.10.1080/713651580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2001). Choosing and judging teachers: What heads and students teachers think matters. Research in Education, 66, 54–64.10.7227/RIE.66.5
   Google Scholar
• Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Perrot, E. (2014). Effective teaching: A practical guide to improve your teaching. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study. (2002). Coorparoo: Education Queensland. Retrieved from http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/38710673
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. (1983). Freedom to learn. New York, NY: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. (2003). Preparing for reading: Teacher resource book 1 (Learning to read: Reading to learn). Sydney: Faculty of Education, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, L. B. (1998). Eliciting critical thinking skills through questioning. The Clearing House, 71, 291–293.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Cited Australian Institute for Teaching and School. Looking at Classroom Practice 2014, p. 3. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/classroom-practice
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. (2002/2003). Assessment for learning. In M. Fullan (Ed.), Leading in a culture of change (Workshop Papers). Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Stroh, H. L., & Sink, C. A. (2002). Applying APA’s learning-centred principles to school-based group counseling. Professional School Counseling, 6, 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571–596.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeden, P., Winter, J., & Broadfoot, P. (2002). Assessment. What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge/Falmer.10.4324/9780203468920
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2003, June). Notes towards a theory of formative assessment. Paper presented at the OECD/CERI meeting, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2003). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 1(1), 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2010). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 49–65.
   Google Scholar