Readable, audible, navigable: accessible communication for the non-profit health sector

References

• Baker, P. M., Fairchild, A. M., & Pater, J. (2012). E-Accessibility and municipal Wi-Fi: Exploring a model for inclusivity and impairment. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 2(2), 52–66. doi:10.4018/jicthd.2010040104
   Google Scholar
• Barak, A., & Sadovsky, Y. (2008). Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing-impaired adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1802–1815. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, K., & Glendinning, C. (2011). Making choices about support services: Disabled adults’ and older people’s use of information. Health & Social Care in the Community, 19(3), 272–279. doi:10.1111/hsc.2011.19.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanck, P. (2014). The struggle for web eQuality by persons with cognitive disabilities. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(1), 4–32. doi:10.1002/bsl.2101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2002). Disability discourses for online identities. Disability & Society, 17(3), 327–344. doi:10.1080/09687590220139883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheatham, L. P. (2012). Effects of internet use on well-being among adults with physical disabilities: A review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(3), 181–188. doi:10.3109/17483107.2011.625071
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K. L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., & Sweetser, K. D. (2010). Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 90–92. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson, A. (2012). Social media and the not-for-profit sector in New Zealand: A pilot study of large not-for-profit organisations ( Unpublished research report). Massey University, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Ellcessor, E. (2010). Bridging disability divides: A critical history of web content accessibility through 2001. Information, Communication & Society, 13(3), 289–308. doi:10.1080/13691180903456546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, A., & Ferri, B. A. (2012). Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(4), 192–200. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01230.x
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2011). Americans living with disability and their technology profile. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, A. P., Petrie, H., & Power, C. (2011). Empirical results from an evaluation of the accessibility of websites by dyslexic users. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Accessible Design in the Digital World (Vol. 792, pp. 41–53). Lisbon: CEUR-WS.org.
   Google Scholar
• Given, L. M., Forcier, E., & Rathi, D. (2013). Social media and community knowledge: An ideal partnership for non‐profit organizations. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Development. (2014). Disability action plan 2014–2018. Wellington: Office for Disability Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., & Tahir, M. (2001). Homepage usability: 50 websites deconstructed. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Obst, P., & Stafurik, J. (2010). Online we are all able bodied: Online psychological sense of community and social support found through membership of disability‐specific websites promotes well‐being for people living with a physical disability. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(6), 525–531. doi:10.1002/casp.v20:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilling, D., & Barrett, P. (2008). Text communication preferences of deaf people in the United Kingdom. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(1), 92–103. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilling, D., Barrett, P., & Floyd, M. (2004). Disabled people and the Internet: Experiences, barriers and opportunities. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisan, F. (2011). Disabled people, digital campaigns, and contentious politics: Upload successful or connection failed? In R. Scullion, D. Lilleker, D. Jackson, & R. Gerodimos (Eds.), The media, political participation, and empowerment (pp. 175–191). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. doi:10.1177/1461444813487959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, M. R., & López, A. J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for Internet use. The Information Society, 26(1), 48–64. doi:10.1080/01615440903423245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viehland, D., & Zhao, F. (2008). An empirical analysis of homepage design in New Zealand. International Journal of Principles and Applications of Information Science and Technology, 2(1), 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Watling, S. (2011). Digital exclusion: Coming out from behind closed doors. Disability & Society, 26(4), 491–495. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.567802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willock, J. (2010). Design vs. disability ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hull School of Art & Design, Hull, UK. Retrieved from http://newmedia.artdesignhull.ac.uk/jwillock/media/dissertation-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Morris, C., & Candler, D. (2013). Dignity, diversity and democracy through inclusive design: Designing an accessible website for ‘Dignity for Disability. Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 63(2), 26.1–26.17. doi:10.7790/tja.v63i2.418
   Google Scholar
• World Wide Web Consortium. (2008). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Retrieved February 20, 2015, from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
   Google Scholar