‘Digital First’: homelessness and data use in an online service environment

References

• ABS. (2012). Australian bureau of statistics 2012 information paper – A statistical definition of homelessness (Cat No. 4922). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• ABS. (2017). Internet activity, Australia (Cat No. 8153.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• ABS. (2018). Australian bureau of statistics census of population and housing: Estimating homelessness 2016 (Cat. No. 2049.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• ACCAN. (2019, February 11) No Australian left offline: ACCAN pushes for affordable broadband (Media Release). Accan. Retrieved from http://accan.org.au/files/Media%20Releases/11.02.19%20-%20No%20Australian%20left%20offline%20-ACCAN%20pushes%20for%20affordable%20broadband.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACMA. (2017). Australian communications media authority communications report 2016–17. Canberra, Australia: Australian Communications Media Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Anangu Lands Paper Tracker Project. (2017). Submission on the social services legislation amendment (Cashless Debit Card) bill 2017. Adelaide, SA: Uniting Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2017, December 20). Australian Government response to the productivity commission inquiry into the telecommunications universal service obligation. Australian Government. Retrieved from https://www.communications.gov.au/documents/australian-government-response-productivity-commissions-inquiry-telecommunications-universal-service
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2016). Vulnerable young people: Interactions across homelessness, youth justice and child protection (Cat No. HOU 279). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2018). Specialist homelessness services annual report 2016–17 (Cat. No. HOU 299). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Audit Office (ANAO). (2017, June 27). myGov digital services (Report No. 59 of 2016–17). Canberra: Australian National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, E., Dowse, L., McCausland, R., & Clarence, M. (2012). Lifecourse institutional costs of homelessness for vulnerable groups. Sydney, NSW: Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• BCEC. (2018). Falling through the Net: The digital divide in Western Australia, focus on Western Australia report series, no. 11/18, August. Bentley, WA: Curtin University, Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. G. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication and Society, 20(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, K., Begun, S., DePrince, A., Haffejee, B., & Kaufmann, S. (2014). Utilizing technology for longitudinal communication with homeless youth. Social Work in Health Care, 53(9), 865–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanillas, J. M., Curry, E., & Wahlster, W. (2016). New horizons for a data-driven economy: A roadmap for usage and exploitation of big data in Europe. Switzerland: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. (2017). Breaking down barriers to digital government: How can we enable vulnerable consumers to have equal participation in digital government? Sydney: Australian Communications Consumer Action Network.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. (2018). Digital government: Building a 21st century platform to better serve the American people. The White House: President Barack Obama. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/egov/digital-government/digital-government.html
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. (2018). The algorithmic rise of the ‘Alt-Right’. Contexts, 17(1), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. (2016). Broadband as universal service (Report No. PE 581.977). Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS): Ron Davies.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte Access Economics. (2018). Analysis of the impact of raising benefit rates. Melbourne: Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS).
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., Hintz, A., & Cable, J. (2016). Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Finance. (2013). Australian public service mobile roadmap. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services (DHS). (2019a). About myGov. Retrieved from https://www.humanservices.gov.au/individuals/subjects/about-mygov
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services (DHS). (2019b). Telephone allowance: Who can get it? Retrieved from https://www.humanservices.gov.au/individuals/services/centrelink/telephone-allowance/who-can-get-it
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases (Working Papers 47). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, N. (2018, February 14). Use these apps to get immediate help for the homeless. LifeHacker. Retrieved from https://lifehacker.com/use-these-apps-to-get-immediate-help-for-the-homeless-1823001478
   Google Scholar
• Eardley, T., Bruce, J., & Goggin, G. (2009). Telecommunications and community wellbeing: A review of the literature on access and affordability for low-income and disadvantaged groups. Sydney: University of NSW, Social Policy Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyrich-Garg, K. M. (2010). Mobile phone technology: A new paradigm for the prevention, treatment, and research of the non-sheltered ‘street’ homeless? Journal of Urban Health, 87(3), 365–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy, A. A. (2017). Federal lifeline program: Frequently asked questions. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G. (2014). New ideas for digital affordability: Is a paradigm shift possible? Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 2(2), 4.1–4.6.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. (2016). The contemporary US digital divide: From initial access to technology maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 19(2), 234–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. L. (2014). Health benefits and barriers to cell phone use in low-income urban US neighborhoods: Indications of technology maintenance. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(3), 233–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. L., Ems, L., & Suri, R. (2014). Cell phone disconnection disrupts access to healthcare and health resources: A technology maintenance perspective. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1422–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gov.UK (2017, February 9). Government transformation strategy 2017 to 2020. Gov.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-transformation-strategy-2017-to-2020
   Google Scholar
• Halford, S., & Savage, M. (2010). Reconceptualizing digital social inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 13(7), 937–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L. (1998). Recovery from psychological trauma. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 52(S1), S98–S103. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1819.1998.0520s5S145.x
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, C., & Truman, B. (2017). Re-thinking social research: Research in an unequal world. In B. Humphries (Ed.), Re-thinking social research (pp. 1–20). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Humphry, J. (2014, August). Homeless and connected: Mobile phones and the Internet in the lives of homeless Australians. Sydney: Australian Communications Consumer Action Network.
   Google Scholar
• Humphry, J. (in press). ‘Second-class’ access: Homelessness and the digital materialization of class. In E. Polson, L. Schofield Clark, & R. Gajjala (Eds.), Routledge companion to media and class. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. (2015). Young homeless people and urban space: Fixed in mobility. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karasti, H., & Syrjänen, A. L. (2004). Artful infrastructuring in two cases of community PD. Proceedings of the eighth conference on participatory design: Artful integration: Interweaving media, materials and practices (Vol. 1, pp. 20–30). Toronto, ON: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 19 of structural analysis in the social sciences). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• McInnes, D. K., Li, A. E., & Hogan, T. P. (2013). Opportunities for engaging low-income, vulnerable populations in health care: A systematic review of homeless persons’ access to and use of information technologies. American Journal of Public Health, 103(S2), e11–e24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNaughton, C. (2008). Transitions through homelessness: Lives on the edge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, R. U. (2008). Why do the poor pay more? Exploring the poverty penalty concept. Journal of International Development, 23(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Franko, W. W. (2012). Digital cities: The Internet and the geography of opportunity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M., & Obar, J. A. (2014). The emerging mobile Internet underclass: A critique of mobile Internet access. The Information Society, 30(5), 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle, G., & Musolino, V. (2016). Connectivity costs: Telecommunications affordability for low income Australians. Sydney: Australian Communications Consumer Action Network.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, H., Parsell, C., Saunders, P., Hill, T., & Liu, E. (2018). Australian homelessness monitor 2018. Victoria: Launch Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2017). Telecommunications universal service obligation (Report No. 83). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A weberian approach to digital inequalities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, M. (2008). The culture of homelessness. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, H., Wenzel, S., Rice, E., Winetrobe, H., & Henwood, B. (2017). No digital divide? Technology use among homeless adults. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 26(1), 73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, E., Lee, A., & Taitt, S. (2011). Cell phone use among homeless youth: Potential for new health interventions and research. Journal of Urban Health, 88(6), 1175–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, P. (2013). Understanding homelessness. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(4), 384–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkorri, A., Teddlie, C., & Teddlie, C. B. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (2016, November 4). The stratifying Internet: Measuring digital inclusion in the mobile era. Digital Asia Hub. Retrieved from https://www.digitalasiahub.org/2016/11/04/the-stratifying-internet-measuring-digital-inclusion-in-the-mobile-era/
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Barraket, J., Wilson, C. K., Cook, K., Louie, Y. M., Holcombe-James, I., ... MacDonald, T. (2018). Measuring Australia’s digital divide: The Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2018, RMIT University. Melbourne, for Telstra. Retrieved from https://digitalinclusionindex.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Australian-digital-inclusion-index-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Ameringen, M., Turna, J., Khalesi, Z., Pullia, K., & Patterson, B. (2017). There is an app for that! The current state of mobile applications (apps) for DSM‐5 obsessive‐compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety and mood disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 34(6), 526–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (pp. 29–52). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Woelfer, J. P., Iverson, A., Hendry, D. G., Friedman, B., & Gill, B. T. (2011). Improving the safety of homeless young people with mobile phones: Values, form and function. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1707–1716). Vancouver, BC: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar