The amalgamation of media use practices and food practices in a school setting: methodological reflections on doing non-media-centric media research with children

References

• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2009). Creative visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society, 31(4), 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. California, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estalella, A., & Criado, T. S. (2018). Introduction: Experimental collaborations. In A. Estalella & T. S. Criado (Eds.), Experimental collaborations: Ethnography through fieldwork devices (pp. 1–30). New York: Berghahn Books, EASA Series 34.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemann, N. O. (2011). Mediatization theory and digital media. Communications – the European Journal of Communication Research, 36(1), 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. California, CA: California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. (2009). Suitable cooking? Performances and positionings in cooking practices among Danish women. Food, Culture & Society, 12(3), 357–377.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. (2010). Consumption challenged: Food in medialised everyday life. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. (2016a). Fokusgrupper [Focus groups]. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. (2016b). Everyday mothering and the media food ‘soup’: Comparing contested food and mothering across genres in two different social contexts. In L. Leer & K. Povlsen (Eds.), Food and media: Practices, distinctions and heterotopias (pp. 149–168). Routledge: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B., & Jensen, I. (2011). Doing “Healthier” food in everyday life? A qualitative study of how Pakistani Danes handle nutritional communication. Critical Public Health, 21(4), 471–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepp, A. (2012). Medialization and the ‘molding force’ of the media. Communications, 37(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E., & Silverstone, R. (Eds.). (1992). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, A., Schatzki, T., & Shove, E. (2016). The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hurdley, R. (2007). Focal points: Framing material culture and visual data. Qualitative Research, 7(3), 355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Krajina, Z. (2014). Negotiating the mediated city: Everyday encounters with public screens. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krajina, Z., Moores, S., & Morley, D. (2014). Non-media-centric media studies: A cross-generational conversation. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(6), 682–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogager, S. G. S. (2012). Når piger og drenge bruger medier og mad: En metode-eksperimenterende mediebrugsanalyse i 4. og 9. klasse [When girls and boys use media and food. An experimental media use analysis in 4th and 9th grade] (PhD Dissertation). University of Aarhus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Krogager, S. G. S. (2015). Mediemad i udvalg: Om udvælgelse og produktion af tekster om mad [On selection and production of texts on food]. In N. J. Graakjær & I. B. Jessen (Eds.), Selektion: Om udvælgelse af medietekster til analyse (pp. 101–121). MÆRKK – Æstetik og Kommunikation, nr. 4 . Aarhus: Systime Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Krogager, S. G. S. (2016). Children cooking media food. Exploring media (food) literacy through experimental methods. In L. Leer & K. Povlsen (Eds.), Food and media: Practices, distinctions and heterotopias (pp. 185–196). Routledge: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Leer, J., Krogager, S. G. S., Povlsen, K. K., & Pedersen, S. H. (2019). Gender and children’s food practices: A qualitative, Danish study of 12- to 14-year old children in a school setting. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 27(3), 181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leer, J., & Povlsen, K. K. (Eds.). (2016). Food and media: Practices, distinctions and heterotopias. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marner, A. (2013). Digital media embedded in Swedish art education – A case study. Education Inquiry, 4(2), 355–373.
   Google Scholar
• Marner, A., & Örtegren, H. (2013). Four approaches to implementing digital media in art education. Education Inquiry, 4(4), 671–688.
   Google Scholar
• Meah, A. (2017). Fathers, food practices and the circuits of intimacy in families in Northern England. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(8), 1145–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moores, S. (2000). Media and everyday life in modern society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moores, S. (2012). Media, place and mobility. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moores, S. (2018). Digital Orientations: Non-media-centric media studies and non-representational theories of practice. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1986). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (2007). Media, modernity and technology. The geography of the new. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (2012). Television, technology, and culture: A contextualist approach. The Communication Review, 15(2), 79–105.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D., & Brunsdon, C. (1999). The nationwide television studies. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D., & Silverstone, R. (1990). Domestic communications: Technologies and meanings. Media, Culture and Society, 12(1), 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, N. (2018). On the engagement with social theory in food studies: Cultural symbols and social practices. Food, Culture & Society, 22(1), 78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2016). Is small the only beautiful? Making sense of ‘large phenomena’ from a practice-based perspective. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 98–113). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. G. S., & Povlsen, K. K. (2010). Eksperimenterende gruppeinterviews med børn om mad, medier og lyst [Experimental group interviews with children about food, media and desire]. In T. Bjørner (Ed.), Den oplevede virkelighed: 11 eksempler på kvalitativ metode i praksis (pp. 129–146). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2010). Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 23–33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K. (1990). Herbert Blumer and the life history tradition. Symbolic Interaction, 13(2), 125–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povlsen, K. K. (2016). ’I (never) just google’: Food and media practices. In J. Leer & K. K. Povlsen (Eds.), Food and media: Practices, distinctions and heterotopias (pp. 129–148). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Povlsen, K. K., Leer, J., Krogager, S. G. S., & Pedersen, S. H. (forthcoming). Children as co-designers and co-producers in Danish schools. London: Bloomsbury series on Transitions in Childhood and Youth Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies. An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organisation of normality. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tække, J., & Paulsen, M. (2017). Undervisning og de tre digitale bølger – Distraktion, koncentration og engagement [Teaching and the three digital waves – Distraction, concentration and engagement]. Læring & Medier (LOM), 10(18).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 25(1), 3–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toft-Nielsen, C., & Krogager, S. G. S. (2015). Gaming practices in everyday life. An analytical operationalization of field theory by means of practice theory. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 31(58), 68–84.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. (2008). Dimensions of a social theory of taste. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1(3), 321–336.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. (2016). The practice of eating. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A., Cheng, S., Olsen, W., & Southerton, D. (2007). Changes in the practice of eating: A comparative analysis. Acta Sociologica, 50(4), 365–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warde, A., & Trentmann, F. (2017). The handbook of the history of consumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wartella, E., & Reeves, B. (1985). Historical trends in research on children and the media: 1900–1960. Journal of Communication, 35(2), 118–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, W. J., Dickinson, A. M., Meah, A., & Short, F. (2016). Reflections on the use of visual methods in a qualitative study of domestic kitchen practices. Sociology, 50(3), 470–485.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L., & Warde, A. (2017). Eating together and eating alone: Meal arrangements in British households. British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 97–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar