References
- Adema, J. (2013). Practise what you preach: Engaging in humanities research through critical praxis. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(5), 491–505.
- Anandarajan, M. (Ed.). (2010). e-Research collaboration: Theory, techniques, and challenges. Cham: Springer.
- Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (2003). e-Research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- ARC. (2020) ERA EI Review consultation paper. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.arc.gov.au/excellence-research-australia/era-ei-review
- Arthur, P. (2019). Tracing the development of the digital humanities in Australia. In S. R. Wong, H. Li, & M. Chou (Eds.), Digital humanities and scholarly research trends in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 1–18). Singapore: Information Science Reference.
- Australian Academy of the Humanities (AAH). (2018a, March). Integrated research infrastructure for humanities, arts & culture. Discussion paper. Retrieved from https://www.humanities.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/AAH-HAC-Data-Summit-Discussion-Paper.pdf
- Australian Academy of the Humanities (AAH). (2018b, October 26). Government intervention strips $4m from humanities researchers. Retrieved from https://www.humanities.org.au/2018/10/26/government-strips-4m-from-humanities-researchers/
- Australian Academy of the Humanities (AAH). (2019, August 14). Academy welcomes government investment in humanities, arts, and social sciences research infrastructure strategy. Media release. Retrieved from https://www.humanities.org.au/2019/08/14/academy-welcomes-government-investment-in-humanities-arts-and-social-sciences-research-infrastructure-strategy/
- Australian Government. (2006). National collaborative research infrastructure strategy strategic roadmap. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/34113
- Australian Government. (2008). National collaborative research infrastructure strategy strategic roadmap 2008. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/national-collaborative-research-infrastructure-strategy-strategic-roadmap-2008
- Australian Government. (2010). National collaborative research infrastructure strategy: Evaluation report. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/34205
- Australian Government. (2015). National innovation & science agenda: Welcome to the ideas boom. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/national-innovation-and-science-agenda-report
- Australian Government. (2017). 2016 National research infrastructure roadmap. Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/43736
- Australian National Data Service (ANDS). (2016). A decade of NCRIS investment in data. Share Newsletter, 26. Retrieved from https://www.monash.edu/ands/news-and-events/share-newsletter/share-26/a-decade-of-ncris-investment-in-data
- Australian Research Council (ARC). (2017). Engagement and impact assessment pilot 2017: Report. Retrieved from https://www.arc.gov.au/engagement-and-impact-assessment/ei-pilot-overview
- Australian Research Council (ARC). (2019). Engagement and impact assessment 2018–2019: National report. Online only. Retrieved from https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/EI/NationalReport/2018/
- Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P., & Tinkler, J. (2014). The impact of the social sciences: How academics and their research make a difference. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Blanke, T., & Hedges, M. (2013). Scholarly primitives: Building institutional infrastructure for humanities e-Science. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(2), 654–661.
- Bode, K., & Arthur, P. (Eds.). (2014). Advancing digital humanities: Research, methods, theories. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Boyd, J., Ferrante, A., O’Keefe, C., Bass, A., Randall, S., & Semmens, J. (2012). Data linkage infrastructure for cross-jurisdictional health-related research in Australia. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 480.
- Bruns, A., & Moon, B. (2019). One day in the life of a national Twittersphere. Nordicom Review, 40(s1), 11–30.
- Burton, A., Groenewegen, D., Love, C., Treloar, A., & Wilkinson, R. (2012). Making research data available in Australia. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(3), 40–43.
- Carletti, L. (2016). Participatory heritage: Scaffolding citizen scholarship. International Information & Library Review, 48(3), 196–203.
- Cox, J., & Tilton, L. (2019). The digital public humanities: Giving new arguments and new ways to argue. Review of Communication, 19(2), 127–146.
- Curtis, V. (2018). Online citizen science and the widening of academia: Distributed engagement with research and knowledge production. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Daniels, J., Gregory, K., & Cottom, T. M. (Eds.). (2017). Digital sociologies. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
- Davies, S. (2013). Research staff and public engagement: A UK study. Higher Education, 66(6), 725–739.
- Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE). (2018a). Facilities for the future: Underpinning Australia’s research and innovation. Government response to the 2016 National Research Infrastructure investment plan. Canberra: DESE. Retrieved from https://www.dese.gov.au/download/4190/2018-research-infrastructure-investment-plan/6225/document/pdf
- Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE). (2018b). National research infrastructure scoping studies. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/national-research-infrastructure-scoping-studies
- Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE). (2020). National research infrastructure: Funded research projects. Retrieved from https://www.dese.gov.au/funded-research-infrastructure-projects.
- Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., … de Vreese, C. (2020). An agenda for open science in communication. Journal of Communication. doi:10.1093/joc/jqz052
- Doidge, S., & Doyle, J. (2020). Australian universities in the age of Covid. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–7. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00131857.2020.1804343.
- Donovan, C., Coryn, C. L. S., & Scriven, M. (2008). The Australian research quality framework: A live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental, and cultural returns of publicly funded research. New Directions for Evaluation, 118(118), 47–60.
- Duffey, B. E., & Pooley, J. (2017). Facebook for academics. Social Media + Society, 3(1). doi:10.1177/2056305117696523
- Gold, M. K., & Klein, L. F. (Eds.). (2019). Debates in the digital humanities 2019. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Harmon, S. H., Caulfield, T., & Joly, Y. (2012). Commercialization versus open science: Making sense of the message(s) in the bottle. Medical Law International, 12(1), 3–10.
- Heise, C., & Pearce, J. M. (2020). From open access to open science: The path from scientific reality to open scientific communication. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402091590.
- Ho, S., Looi, J., Leung, Y., & Goh, T. (2020). Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore: A qualitative comparison of macro- and meso-level concerns. Public Understanding of Science, 29(2), 211–229.
- Holley, R. (2007, November 23). The Australian Newspapers Digitisation Program (ANDP): Helping communities access and explore their newspaper heritage. Keynote address, Australian Media Traditions conference. Bathurst, NSW: Charles Sturt University.
- Hooi, R., & Wang, J. (2019). Research funding and academic engagement: A Singapore case. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(2), 162–174.
- Jankowski, N. (Ed.). (2009). e-Research: Transformation in scholarly practice. New York: Routledge.
- Kennan, M., Williamson, K., & Johanson, G. (2012). Wild data: Collaborative e-Research and university libraries. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 43(1), 56–79.
- Kidd, J. (2018). Public heritage and the promise of the digital. In A. M. Labrador & N. A. Silberman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of public heritage theory and practice (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190676315.013.9
- Koziol, M. (2018, October 26). Former education minister vetoed $4.2 million in recommended university research grants. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/former-education-minister-vetoed-4-2-million-in-recommended-university-research-grants-20181026-p50c3a.html
- Kung, K. (Ed.). (2020). Reconceptualizing the digital humanities in Asia: New representations of art, history and culture. Singapore: Springer.
- Lahti, L., da Silva, F., Laine, M., Lähteenoja, V., & Tolonen, M. (2017). Alchemy & algorithms: Perspectives on the philosophy and history of open science. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 3, 1–11.
- Lawrence, A. (2012). Electronic documents in a print world: Grey literature and the internet. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 143(1), 122–131.
- Lawrence, A. (2017). Influence seekers: The production of grey literature for policy and practice. Information Services & Use, 37, 389–403.
- Lewi, H., Smith, W., Vom Lehn, D., & Cooke, S. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge international handbook of new digital practices in galleries, libraries, archives, museums and heritage sites. New York: Routledge.
- Lewis, N. (2020). Open communication science: A primer on why and some recommendations for how. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(2), 71–82.
- Lupton, D. (2015). Digital sociology. London and New York: Routledge.
- Mansell, R., & Steinmuller, E. (2020). Advanced introduction to platform economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Marks, K. (2015). The power of the humanities. Australian Academy of the Humanities. Retrieved from https://www.humanities.org.au/issue-item/the-power-of-the-humanities/
- Mcnamara, L. (2018). Understanding research impact in law: The research excellence framework and engagement with UK Governments. King’s Law Journal, 29(3), 437–469.
- Meyer, E., & Schroeder, R. (2015). Knowledge machines: Digital transformations of the science and humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Mifsud, M. (2019). To the humanities: What does communication studies give? Review of Communication, 19(2), 77–93.
- Mirowski, P. (2018). The future of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), 171–203.
- National Research Alliance. (2015, March 4). Open letter to the Prime Minister of Australia: Australia’s national research infrastructure preparing for shutdown. Retrieved from https://www.science.org.au/files/userfiles/events/documents/research-alliance-open-letter-to-the-prime-minister.pdf
- Orton-Johnson, K., & Prior, N. (Eds.). (2013). Digital sociology: Critical perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Phillips, T., Ballard, H., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2019). Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), 665–690.
- Pooley, J. (2016). Open media scholarship: The case for open access in media studies. International Journal of Communication, 10, 6148–6164.
- Probyn, E., Muecke, S., & Shoemaker, A. (Eds.). (2006). Creating value: The humanities and public engagement. Canberra: Australian Academy of Humanities.
- Procter, R., Voss, A., & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2013). Fostering the human infrastructure of e-Research. Information, Communication & Society, 16(10), 1668–1691.
- Research Quality Framework Technical Working Group on Research Impact (TWGRI). (2006). Final report: Optimal methodology for assessing research impact. Canberra: TWGRI, Department of Education, Commonwealth of Australia.
- Scharp, K., & Thomas, L. (2019). Disrupting the humanities and social science binary: Framing communication studies as a transformative discipline. Review of Communication, 19(2), 147–163.
- Schreibman, S., Siemens, R. G., & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2016). A new companion to the digital humanities. New York: Wiley Blackwell.
- Stern, N. (2016) Building on success and learning from experience: An independent review of the research excellence framework. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-excellence-framework-review
- Tehan, D. (2018, October 31). Strengthening public confidence in university research funding. Media release. Retrieved from https://ministers.dese.gov.au/tehan/strengthening-public-confidence-university-research-funding
- Tsey, K. (2019). Working on wicked problems: A strengths-based approach to research engagement and impact. Cham: Springer.
- Turner, G. (2008). Towards an Australian digital humanities archive. Australian Academy of the Humanities. Retrieved from https://www.humanities.org.au/issue-item/humanities-digital-archive/
- Turner, G., & Brass, K. (2014). Mapping the humanities, arts and social sciences in Australia. Australian Academy of Humanities. http://www.humanities.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/AAH-Mapping-HASS-2014.pdf
- University of Queensland (UQ). (2019). Engagement narrative: Built environment and design. ARC Data Portal. Retrieved from https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/EI/Web/Engagement/EngagementNarrative/29
- Van Dijck, J., de Waal, M., & Poell, T. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Western Sydney University (WSU). (2019). Engagement narrative: Language, communication, and culture. ARC Data Portal. Retrieved from https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/EI/Web/Engagement/EngagementNarrative/174