1,383
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The role of fashion influencers’ attractiveness: A gender-specific perspective

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Agthe, M., & Spoerrle, M. (2009). On the context sensitivity of the sexual attribution bias: A replication and extension to situations of failure. The Open Psychology Journal, 2(1), 19–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350100902010019
  • Agthe, M., Spörrle, M., & Försterling, F. (2008). Success attributions and more: Multidimensional extensions of the sexual attribution bias to failure attributions, social emotions, and the desire for social interaction. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1627–1638.
  • Agthe, M., Spörrle, M., Frey, D., Walper, S., & Maner, J. K. (2013). When romance and rivalry awaken. Human Nature, 24(2), 182–195.
  • Agthe, M., Spörrle, M., & Maner, J. K. (2010). Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Anti-attractiveness bias in organizational evaluation and decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1151–1154.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2021). Sexual orientation. Accessed 22 September 2021. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20110722080052/http://www.healthyminds.org/More-Info-For/GayLesbianBisexuals.aspx
  • American Psychological Association. (2015). Definitions related to sexual orientation and gender diversity in APA documents. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Psychological Association. (2021). Answers to your questions for a better understanding of sexual orientation and homosexuality. Accessed 22 September 2021. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/orientation
  • Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 100–109.
  • Antil, J., Burton, R., & Robinson, M. (2012). Exploring the challenges facing female athletes as endorsers. Journal of Brand Strategy, 1(3), 292–307.
  • Aslam, H., Brown, J., Nikolaev, E., & Reading, E. (2019). Gender and play in goblin dice. In 20th International conference on intelligent games and simulation, GAME-ON 2019(pp. 19–25). Breda, Netherlands: EUROSIS.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
  • Baker, M. J., & Churchill, G. A. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 538–555.
  • Balabanis, G., & Chatzopoulou, E. (2019). Under the influence of a blogger: The role of information-seeking goals and issue involvement. Psychology and Marketing, 36(4), 342–353.
  • Barry, B., & Phillips, B. J. (2016). The fashion engagement grid: Understanding men’s responses to fashion advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 438–464.
  • Bekk, M., Spörrle, M., Völckner, F., Spieß, E., & Woschée, R. (2017). What is not beautiful should match: How attractiveness similarity affects consumer responses to advertising. Marketing Letters, 28(4), 509–522.
  • Berkowitz, L., & Hatfield, E. (1976). Equity theory: Toward a general theory of social interaction. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Bernini-Hodel, D., Agustsson, E., Timofte, R., Affolter, S., & Patcas, R. (2017). Using artificial intelligence to evaluate the impact of orthognathic therapy on apparent age and facial attractiveness. In Christos, K. ed. The 93rd European orthodontic society congress (EOS 2017)(p. SP52). Montreux, Switzerland: ETH Zurich.
  • Bhutada, N. S., & Rollins, B. L. (2015). Disease-specific direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals: An examination of endorser type and gender effects on consumers’ attitudes and behaviors. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 11(6), 891–900.
  • Bleske-Rechek, A., & Lighthall, M. (2010). Attractiveness and rivalry in women’s friendships with women. Human Nature, 21(1), 82–97.
  • Bower, A. B., & Landreth, S. (2001). Is beauty best? Highly versus normally attractive models in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 1–12.
  • Boyd, T. C., & Shank, M. D. (2004). Athletes as product endorsers: The effect of gender and product relatedness. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13(2), 82–93.
  • Burmann, C., Schaefer, K., & Maloney, P. (2008). Industry image: Its impact on the brand image of potential employees. Journal of Brand Management, 15(3), 157–176.
  • Byrne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. (1968). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 36(2), 259–271.
  • Calvo, M. G., Gutiérrez-García, A., & Beltrán, D. (2018). Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(6), 1233–1247.
  • Chen, H. (2018). College-aged young consumers‘ perceptions of social media marketing: The story of Instagram. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 39(1), 22–36.
  • Chen, Y. H., Hsu, I. C., & Lin, C. C. (2010). Website attributes that increase consumer purchase intention: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1007–1014.
  • Chesler, P. (2009). Woman’s inhumanity to woman. Chicago, IL: Lawrence Hill Books.
  • Childers, C. C., Lemon, L. L., & Hoy, M. G. (2019). #Sponsored #Ad: Agency perspective on influencer marketing campaigns. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 40(3), 258–274.
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Rhoads, K. V. L. (2001). Human behavior and the marketplace. Marketing Research, 13(3), 8–13.
  • Cialdini, R. B. (2011). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York, NY: Collins.
  • Courtney, A. E., & Whipple, T. W. (1983). Sex stereotyping in advertising. Lexington, MA: Free Press.
  • De Soto, C. B., & Kuethe, J. L. (1959). Subjective probabilities of interpersonal relationships. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(2), 290–294.
  • De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828.
  • Der Stroth, J. A., Michael, S. A., & Sedov, A. (2019). Citizen influencers on instagram: A quantitative study of persuasiveness and purchase intentions within the fashion industry (Student thesis). Linnaeus University, Sweden, Europe.
  • Dholakia, R. R., & Sternthal, B. (1977). Highly credible sources: Persuasive facilitators or persuasive liabilities? Journal of Consumer Research, 3(4), 223–232.
  • Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290.
  • Eichhorn, B. R. (2014). Common method variance techniques. Cleveland state university, department of operations & supply chain management. Cleveland, OH: SAS Institute Inc.
  • Elias, N., & Colvin, R. (2020). A third option: Understanding and assessing non-binary gender policies in the United States. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(2), 191–211.
  • Enzendorfer, M., & Haller, P. (2020). Intersex and education: What can schools and queer school projects learn from current discourses on intersex in Austria? In D. A. Francis, J. I. Kjaran, & J. Lehtonen (Eds.), Queer social movements and outreach work in schools(pp. 261–284). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 226–235.
  • Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304–341.
  • Feltman, C. E., & Szymanski, D. M. (2018). Instagram use and self-objectification: The roles of internalization, comparison, appearance commentary, and feminism. Sex Roles, 78(5–6), 311–324.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  • Försterling, F., Preikschas, S., & Agthe, M. (2007). Ability, luck, and looks: An evolutionary look at achievement ascriptions and the sexual attribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 775–788.
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206.
  • Gannon, V., & Prothero, A. (2018). Beauty bloggers and YouTubers as a community of practice. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(7–8), 592–619.
  • Gröppel-Klein, A., & Spilski, A. (2019). Verhaltenswissenschaftliche grundlagen zur markenführung. In F. R. Esch (Ed.), Handbuch markenführung(pp. 43–69). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
  • Gutiérrez-García, A., Beltrán, D., & Calvo, M. G. (2019). Facial attractiveness impressions precede trustworthiness inferences: Lower detection thresholds and faster decision latencies. Cognition & Emotion, 33(2), 378–385.
  • Haas, A., & Gregory, S. W. (2005). The impact of physical attractiveness on women’s social status and interactional power. Sociological Forum, 20(3), 449–471.
  • Haferkamp, N., & Krämer, N. C. (2011). Social comparison 2.0: Examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(5), 309–314.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Hansen, I., Erlandsson, R., & Mokhtari, H. (2013). Celebrity endorsement: A gender perspective of consumer behavior in the fashion industry (Student thesis). Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
  • Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Harmon, R. R., & Coney, K. A. (1982). The persuasive effects of source credibility in buy and lease situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(2), 255–260.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, R., Jean, R.-J. B., & Daekwan Kim, R. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
  • Henshaw, S., Estes, L., & Olsen, L. (2018). Inter-female hostility: Attractiveness and femininity vs. likeability. Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies, 35(1), 4.
  • Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62.
  • Hsu, C. K., & McDonald, D. (2002). An examination on multiple celebrity endorsers in advertising. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(1), 19–29.
  • Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204.
  • Hund, E. (2017). Measured beauty: Exploring the aesthetics of Instagram’s fashion influencers. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on social media & society(pp. 1–5). Toronto, ON: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Jack, D. C. (1999). Behind the mask: Destruction and creativity in women’s aggression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jalilvand, M. R., & Samiei, N. (2012). The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and purchase intention. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30(4), 460–476.
  • Jin, S. V., & Muqaddam, A. (2019). Product placement 2.0: “Do brands need influencers, or do influencers need brands?”. Journal of Brand Management, 26(5), 522–537.
  • Joseph, W. B. (1982). The credibility of physically attractive communicators: A review. Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 15–24.
  • Juhlin, L., & Soini, M. (2018). How do influencer marketers affect brand associations? A semiotic instagram study in the sports fashion industry (Student thesis). Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
  • Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13.
  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128.
  • Kerin, R. A. (1979). Black model appearance and product evaluations. Journal of Communication, 29(1), 123–128.
  • Kim, W. B., & Choo, H. J. (2019). The effects of SNS fashion influencer authenticity on follower behavior intention -focused on the mediation effect of fanship. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 43(1), 17–32.
  • Klaus, N., & Bailey, A. A. (2008). Celebrity endorsements: An examination of gender and consumers’ attitudes. American Journal of Business, 23(2), 53–62.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
  • Kock, N., & Gaskins, L. (2014). The mediating role of voice and accountability in the relationship between internet diffusion and government corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technology for Development, 20(1), 23–43.
  • Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580.
  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
  • Leiner, D. J. (2013). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Post hoc identification of meaningless data in internet surveys. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2361661
  • Linnér, E., Taha, S., & Carlsson, J. (2018). What characterizes an influential instagram fashion influencer? A descriptive research (Student thesis). Linnaeus University, Småland, Sweden.
  • Lo, S. K., Hsieh, A. Y., & Chiu, Y. P. (2013). Contradictory deceptive behavior in online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1755–1762.
  • Lohmöller, J. B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag HD.
  • Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73.
  • Loya, B. N., Cowan, G., & Walters, C. (2006). The role of social comparison and body consciousness in women’s hostility toward women. Sex Roles, 54(7–8), 575–583.
  • Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Rouby, D. A., & Miller, S. L. (2007). Can’t take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 389–401.
  • Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
  • Marcoulides, G. A. (2009). Modern methods for business research. Abingdon, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Martelli, M., Majaj, N. J., & Pelli, D. G. (2005). Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Journal of Vision, 5(1), 58–70.
  • McGloin, R., & Denes, A. (2018). Too hot to trust: Examining the relationship between attractiveness, trustworthiness, and desire to date in online dating. New Media & Society, 20(3), 919–936.
  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181–215.
  • Menon, T., & Thompson, L. (2007). Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Self-enhancing biases in threat appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 45–60.
  • Merriam-Webster. (2021). Definition of CISGENDER. Accessed 22 September 2021. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cisgender
  • Mishra, P., Dhar, U., & Raotiwala, S. (2001). Celebrity endorsers and adolescents: A study of gender influences. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 26(4), 59–66.
  • Mizock, L., & Lundquist, C. (2016). Missteps in psychotherapy with transgender clients: Promoting gender sensitivity in counseling and psychological practice. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3(2), 148–155.
  • Mowen, J. C. (1980). On product endorser effectiveness: A balance model approach. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 3, 41–57.
  • Murchison, G., Adkins, D., Conard, L., Ehrensaft, D., Elliott, T., & Hawkins, L. (2016). Supporting and caring for transgender children. Human rights campaign. Accessed 22 September 2021. Retrieved from https://www.hrc.org/resources/supporting-caring-for-transgender-children
  • Netemeyer, R., Bearden, W., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
  • Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
  • Ostberg, J. (2012). Masculinity and fashion. In C. C. Otnes & L. T. Zayer (Eds.), Gender, culture, and consumer behavior(pp. 255–283). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG). (2004). Our trans children: A publication of the PFLAG transgender network (TNET). Washington, DC: PFLAG Transgender Network.
  • Patzer, G. L. (1983). Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness. Journal of Business Research, 11(2), 229–241.
  • Peetz, T. B., Parks, J. B., & Spencer, N. E. (2004). Sport heroes as sport product endorsers: The role of gender in the transfer of meaning process for selected undergraduate students. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13(3), 141–150.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81.
  • Porter, S., Ten Brinke, L., & Gustaw, C. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(6), 477–491.
  • Praxmarer, S. (2011). How a presenter’s perceived attractiveness affects persuasion for attractiveness-unrelated products. International Journal of Advertising, 30(5), 839–865.
  • Putrevu, S. (2004). Communicating with the sexes: Male and female responses to print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 51–62.
  • Reichert, T., Latour, M. S., & Kim, J. Y. (2007). Assessing the influence of gender and sexual self-schema on affective responses to sexual content in advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 29(2), 63–77.
  • Reniers, R. L. E. P., Murphy, L., Lin, A., Bartolomé, S. P., Wood, S. J., & Ginsberg, S. D. (2016). Risk perception and risk-taking behaviour during adolescence: The influence of personality and gender. PLoS One, 11(4), e0153842.
  • Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 199–226.
  • Richards, C., Bouman, W. P., Seal, L., Barker, M. J., Nieder, T. O., & T’Sjoen, G. (2016). Non-binary or genderqueer genders. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 95–102.
  • Rocha, M. A. V., Hammond, L., & Hawkins, D. (2005). Age, gender and national factors in fashion consumption. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 9(4), 380–390.
  • Sakib, M. D. N., Zolfagharian, M., & Yazdanparast, A. (2020). Does parasocial interaction with weight loss vloggers affect compliance? The role of vlogger characteristics, consumer readiness, and health consciousness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101733.
  • Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2019). Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281.
  • Shan, Y., Chen, K. J., & Lin, J. S. (2020). When social media influencers endorse brands: The effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive. International Journal of Advertising, 39(5), 590–610.
  • Sharma, P. N., & Kim, K. H. (2013). A comparison of PLS and ML bootstrapping techniques in SEM: A Monte Carlo study. In H. Abdi, W. W. Chin, V. Esposito Vinzi, G. Russolillo, & L. Trinchera (Eds.), New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods(pp. 201–208). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Shechory-Bitton, M., & Zvi, L. (2015). The effect of offender’s attractiveness and subject’s gender on judgments in swindling. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(4), 559–570.
  • Simmons, R. (2011). Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls. New York, NY: Harcourt.
  • Smith, D. L. (2004). Why we lie: The evolutionary roots of deception and the unconscious mind. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Smith, G. (2001). The 2001 general election: Factors influencing the brand image of political parties and their leaders. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(9–10), 989–1006.
  • Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742.
  • Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R., & Leavitt, C. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 252–260.
  • Trivedi, J. P. (2018). Measuring the comparative efficacy of an attractive celebrity influencer vis-à-vis an expert influencer - a fashion industry perspective. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 11(3), 256–271.
  • Von Mettenheim, W., & Wiedmann, K. P. (2021). The complex triad of congruence issues in influencer marketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(5), 1277–1296.
  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 151–176.
  • Whittler, T. E., & DiMeo, J. (1991). Viewers’ reactions to racial cues in advertising stimuli. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(6), 37–46.
  • Wiedmann, K. P., Hennigs, N., Schmidt, S., & Wuestefeld, T. (2014). Drivers and outcomes of brand heritage: Consumers’ perception of heritage brands in the automotive industry. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 205–220.
  • Wiedmann, K. P., & Von Mettenheim, W. (2020). Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise–social influencers’ winning formula? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(5), 707–725.
  • Wilkie, M. (1995). Scent of a market. American Demographics, 17(8), 40–46.
  • Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.
  • Zhao, N., Zhou, M., Shi, Y., & Zhang, J. (2015). Face attractiveness in building trust: Evidence from measurement of implicit and explicit responses. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(5), 855–866.
  • Zietek, N. (2016). Influencer marketing: The characteristics and components of fashion influencer marketing (Student thesis). University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.