Extended-mixed methods: a new research paradigm for the creative industries

References

• Barker, R. (2019). Creatives talk technology: Exploring the role and influence of digital media in the creative process of advertising art directors and copywriters. Media Practice and Education, 20(3), 244–259. doi:10.1080/25741136.2018.1464741
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, R., Mahar, D., Cockshaw, W., & Wong, I. (2018). Personality and online news commenting behaviours: Uncovering the characteristics of those below the line. Media International Australia, 169(1), 117–130. doi:10.1177/1329878X18798695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, C., & Kerrigan, S. (Eds.). (2018). Screen production: Creative practice as a mode of enquiry. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I. (2019). TRIZ thinking heuristics to nurture future generations of creative engineers. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 86–97. doi:10.1080/22054952.2019.1699493
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I., Skiadopoulos, A., Aranda-Mena, G., Cascini, G., & Russo, D. (2019). Engineering creativity: The influence of general knowledge and thinking heuristics. In L. Chechurin & M. Collan (Eds.), Advances in systematic creativity (pp. 245–263). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2000). Approaches to social enquiry. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennen, B. (2017). Qualitative research methods for media studies (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, L. (2006, November). Practice based research: A guide, Creativity & Cognition Studios (CCS) Report; V1.0. Sydney: University of Technology. Retrieved from https://www.creativityandcognition.com/practice-based-research/
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F., & Luisi, P. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coate, B., Verhoeven, D., & Davidson, A. (2017). The cinema cities index: Comparing urban cinema cultures around the world. Media International Australia, 163(1), 163–175. doi:10.1177/1329878X17693931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffee, S. (2016). The practice of freelance print journalism. In P. McIntyre, J. Fulton, & E. Paton (Eds.), The creative system in action: Understanding cultural production and practice (pp. 100–112). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (1993). Ethnography and popular music studies. Popular Music, 12(2), 123–138. doi:10.1017/S0261143000005511
   Google Scholar
• Comunian, R. (2019). Complexity thinking as a coordinating theoretical framework for creative industries research. In S. Cunningham & T. Flew (Eds.), A research agenda for creative industries (pp. 39–57). Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., Olejniczak, E., Lenette, C., & Smedley, C. (2017). Media coverage of refugees and asylum seekers in regional Australia: A critical discourse analysis. Media International Australia, 162(1), 78–89. doi:10.1177/1329878X16667832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Criticos, H. (2021). The constrabling effect of internet radio. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 1–12. doi:10.1080/19376529.2021.1937629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems. Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800225-4.00002-1
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H. (2020). Engineering: The ultimate expression of creativity? In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity 3 (pp. 434–439). Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23752-8
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S., & Flew, T. (2019). A research agenda for creative industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R., & Sigthorsson, G. (2013). Introducing the creative industries: From theory to practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270–283. doi:10.1177/1558689808316807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2017). The good research guide for small-scale research projects (6th ed.). London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K., Fulton, J. M., & Scott, P. (2016). Detention attention: Framing a Manus Island riot. Pacific Journalism Review: Te Koakoa, 22(1), 74–92. doi:10.24135/pjr.v22i1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, P. (2019). State of play: A survey of sports journalists in Australia. Australian Journalism Review, 41(2), 155–167. doi:10.1386/ajr_00003_1
   Google Scholar
• Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, Massachusets: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D. (2018). Six equations to help conceptualize the field of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 262–267. doi:10.1177/1558689818779433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: Perspectives of past editors on the current state of the field and future directions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 423–432. doi:10.1177/1558689817729476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flew, T. (2012). The creative industries: Culture and policy. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, J. M. (2013). Communication joy: Print journalists and the experience of flow. In M. J. Pitts & T. J. Socha (Eds.), Health communication (Vol. 3, pp. 238–251). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, J. M. (2014). Mentoring and Australian journalism. Australian Journalism Review, 36(1), 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, J. M. (2016). Print journalism and the system of creativity. In P. McIntyre, J. M. Fulton, & E. Paton (Eds.), The creative system in action: understanding cultural production and practice (pp. 87–99). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Houndmills.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, J. M. (2019). Media entrepreneurship: Preparing students for work in a creative profession [online]. Australian Journalism Review, 41(1), 67–83. doi:10.1386/ajr.41.1.67_1
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, J. M., Scott, P., & Koutsoukos, C. K. (2020). A push from the bush: An introduction to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s Remote Communities Project. Australian Journalism Review, 42(1), 77–92. doi:10.1386/ajr_00020_1
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, C. N., Hanan, J. S., & Nail, T. (2019). What is new materialism? Angelaki, 24(6), 111–134. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2019.1684704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, E. (2018). A first look at communication theory (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Grix, J. (2018). The foundations of research (3rd ed.). London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2019). Media and communication research methods (2nd ed.). London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanusch, F., Clifford, K., Davies, K., English, P., Fulton, J. M., & Lindgren, M., & Zion, L. (2015). Australian journalism students’ professional views and news consumption: Results from a representative study. Australian Journalism Review, 37(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hanusch, F., Clifford, K., Davies, K., English, P., Fulton, J. M., Lindgren, M., & Zion, L. (2016). For the lifestyle and a love of creativity: Australian students’ motivations for studying journalism. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 160(1), 101–113. doi:10.1177/1329878X16638894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C. (2017). The songwriting coalface: Where multiple intelligences collide. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 7(3), 58–67. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622373
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C. (2018). Interstellar songwriting: What propels a song beyond escape velocity? In S. Loy, J. Rickwood, & S. Bennett (Eds.), Popular music, stars and stardom (pp. 21–36). ANU Press. doi:10.22459/pmss.06.2018.02
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. (2017). Taking a systems view of creativity: On the right path toward understanding. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 341–344. doi:10.1002/jocb.196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S. M. (2013). Accommodating creative documentary practice within a revised systems model of creativity. Journal of Media Practice, 14(2), 111–127. doi:10.1386/jmpr.14.2.111_1
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S. (2016). The spectator in the film-maker: Re-framing filmology through creative film-making practices. Journal of Media Practice, 17(2–3), 186–198. doi:10.1080/14682753.2016.1248172
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S. (2018). A 'logical' explanation of screen production as method-led research. In C. Batty & S. M. Kerrigan (Eds.), Screen Production: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry (pp. 11–28). Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S., & Callaghan, J. (2016). The filmmakers’ research perspectives: An overview of Australian and UK filmmaking research. In S. Kerrigan, K. Dooley, & B. Frankham (Eds.), Refereed Proceedings: Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association Annual Conference (pp. 1–16). Ultimo, NSW: Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S., & Callaghan, J. (2018). Filmmaking in the Academy Special Issue. Media Practice and Education, 19(3), 227–228. doi:10.1080/25741136.2018.153215
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S., & McIntyre, P. (2019). Creative filmmaking processes, procedures and practices: Embodied and internalized filmmaking agency. In C. Batty, M. Berry, K. Dooley, B. Frankham, & S. M. Kerrigan (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production (pp. 3–17). Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luckman, S., Anderson, H. S., Sinha, R. S., Rentschler, R. S., & Chalklen, C. S. (2019). ‘The devil is in the level’: Understanding inequality in Australia’s Film, TV and Radio industries. Media International Australia, 176(1), 3–18. doi:10.1177/1329878X19892772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckman, S., & Andrew, J. (2020). Craftspeople and designer makers in the contemporary creative economy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P. (2006). Creative practice as research: 'testing out' the systems model of creativity through practitioner-based enquiry. In Speculations and Innovations: Applying Practice Led Research in the Creative Industries. Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P. (2008). Creativity and cultural production: A study of contemporary Western popular music songwriting. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 40–52. doi:10.1080/10400410701841898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P. (2009). Rethinking communication, creativity and cultural Production: Outlining issues for media practice. In T. Flew (Ed.), Communication, creativity and global citizenship: Refereed Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communications Association Annual Conference. Brisbane: QUT, July 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P. (2018). Using Practitioner Based Enquiry (PBE) to examine screen production as a form of creative practice. In C. Batty & S. M. Kerrigan (Eds.), Screen Production: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry (pp. 85–102). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Houndmills.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P., Balnaves, M., Kerrigan, S., King, E., & Williams, C. (2019). Creativity and cultural production in the Hunter: An applied ethnographic study of new entrepreneurial systems in the Creative Industries. Australian Research Council. https://soci.newcastle.edu.au/hci/wp-content/uploads/sites/291/2019/03/Hunter-Creative-Industries-Final-ReportV5-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P., Davis, R., & Kishore, V. (2014). The systems model of creativity and Indian film: A study of two young music directors from Kerala, India. In V. Kishore, A. Sarwal, & P. Patar (Eds.), Bollywood and its Other(s) (pp. 110–129). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Houndmills.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P., Fulton, J. M., Paton, E. (Eds.). (2016). The creative system in action: Understanding cultural production and practice.Basingstoke, Hampshire: Houndmills.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P., & Kerrigan, S. (2020). Submission 237 to the Standing committee on communications and the arts: Australia’s creative and cultural industries and institutions. Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Communications/Arts/Submissions
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P., & Sheather, G. (2013). The Newcastle music industry: An ethnographic study of a regional creative system in action. International Journal of Music Business Research, 2(2), 36–60. http://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/international-journal-of-music-business-research-ijmbr/
   Google Scholar
• Meany, M. M. (2016). Comedy, creativity, agency: The hybrid individual. In P. McIntyre, J. M. Fulton, & E. Paton (Eds.), The creative system in action: Understanding cultural production and practice (pp. 169–184). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Molina-Azorin, J. F., & Fetters, M. D. (2019). Building a better world through mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 275–281. doi:10.1177/1558689819855864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research Research, 1(1), 48–76. doi:10.1177/2345678906292462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L., & Lawrence, B. (2000). Practitioner-based enquiry: Principles for postgraduate research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L., & McCallum, K. (2016). Drowning in our own home: A metaphor-led discourse analysis of Australian news media reporting on maritime asylum seekers. Communication Research and Practice, 2(2), 159–176. doi:10.1080/22041451.2016.1188229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., & Paulus, P. B. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 326–346). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, E. (2016). The dynamic system of fiction writing. In P. McIntyre, J. Fulton, & E. Paton (Eds.), The creative system in action: Understanding cultural production and practice (pp. 113–124). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Protogerou, A., Kontolaimou, A., & Caloghirou, A. (2017). Innovation in the European creative industries: A firm-level empirical approach. Industry and Innovation, 24(6), 587–612. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1263551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings (4th ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, D., & Bennett, T. (2018). Tastes and practices in three Australian cultural fields: Television, music and sport. Media International Australia, 167(1), 121–125. doi:10.1177/1329878X18767937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoneman, P., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2016). Quantitative research. In N. Gilbert & P. Stoneman (Eds.), Researching social life (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7. doi:10.1177/2345678906293042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., & McIntyre, P. (2020). Sound engineering in the recording studio as creative practice. In S. Zagorski-Thomas, K. Isakoff, S. Lacasse, & S. Stévance (Eds.), The Art of Record Production: Creative Practice in the Studio (pp. 155–171). Abingdon: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tubb, A., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., Patston, T., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). The development of mathematical creativity across high school: Increasing, decreasing, or both? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1–34. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1976). Stages in the creative process. In A. Rothenberg & C. R. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 69–73). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, R., van Raalte, C., & Allegrini, S. (2020). The ‘shelf-life’ of a media career: A study of the long-term career narratives of media graduates. Creative Industries Journal, 13(2), 178–193. doi:10.1080/17510694.2019.1664099
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zion, L., Dodd, A., Sherwood, M., O’Donnell, P., Marjoribanks, T., & Ricketson, M. (2016). Working for less: The aftermath for journalists made redundant in Australia between 2012 and 2014. Communication Research and Practice, 2(2), 117–136. doi:10.1080/22041451.2016.1185924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar