Falsehood and satire on social media: does partisan-motivated reasoning influence fake news sharing?

References

• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amador, J., Oehmichen, A., & Molina-Solana, M. (2017). Characterizing political fake news in Twitter by its meta-data. ArxXiv, 1712.05999. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1712.05999
   Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. F. … Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2018). Fake news and the economy of emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154–175. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., & Rivero, G. (2015). Understanding the political representativeness of Twitter users. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 712–729. doi:10.1177/0894439314558836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M. (2017). Exposure to political disagreement in social media versus face-to-face and anonymous online settings. Political Communication, 34(2), 302–321. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1235639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, K., Davis, J., Hinckley, K., & Horiuchi, Y. (2019). Partisan motivated reasoning and misinformation in the media: Is news from ideologically uncongenial sources more suspicious? Japanese Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 129–142. doi:10.1017/S1468109919000082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, C. M. (2018). Tell Me Lies: Fake News, Source Cues, and Partisan Motivated Reasoning. [ Doctor of Philosophy]. University of California at Merced, Merced, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, N. J., Rubin, V. L., & Chen, Y. (2015). Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–4. doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, A. (2019). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on mechanical turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(3), 613–628. doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, A. (2011). Satire and dissent: Interventions in contemporary political debate. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A., & Thompson, E. (2012). Live from New York, it’s the fake news! Saturday night live and the (non) politics of parody. Popular Communication, 10(1–2), 170–182. doi:10.1080/15405702.2012.638582
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K., Ang, C., & Deravi, F. (2017). Farewell to truth? Conspiracy theories and fake news on social media. The Psychologist, 30, 36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
   Google Scholar
• Faragó, L., Kende, A., & Krekó, P. (2019). We only believe in news that we doctored ourselves: the connection between partisanship and political fake news. Social Psychology, 1(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, D., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 127–150. doi:10.1111/pops.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friggeri, A., Adamic, L., Eckles, D., & Cheng, J. (2014, June 1–4). Rumor cascades. Paper presented at the 8th international association for the advancement of artifical intelligence conference on weblogs and social media, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B. (2021). Partisan bias in the identification of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(9), 723–724. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. The Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451–462. doi:10.1177/107769908606300301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfert, A. J. I. L. (2018). Fake news: A definition. Informal Logic, 38(1), 84–117. doi:10.22329/il.v38i1.5068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart, N., Torres, R., & Negahban, A. (2017). Combatting fake news: An investigation of individuals’ information verification behaviors on social networking sites. Paper presented at the twenty-third Americas conference on information systems, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Gramlich, J. (2020). Q&A: How pew research center evaluated Americans’ trust in 30 news sources. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/24/qa-how-pew-research-center-evaluated-americans-trust-in-30-news-sources/
   Google Scholar
• Guilbeault, D., Becker, J., & Centola, D. (2018). Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), 9714–9719. doi:10.1073/pnas.1722664115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, L., Andreu Perez, L., & Ray, R. (2021). Mapping recent development in scholarship on fake news and misinformation, 2008 to 2017: Disciplinary contribution, topics, and impact. The American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 290–315. doi:10.1177/0002764219869402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. (2019). Fight or flight? Attributing responsibility in response to mixed congruent and incongruent partisan news in selective exposure media environments. Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1–26. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1566394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. (2020). Fight or flight? Attributing responsibility in response to mixed congruent and incongruent partisan news in selective exposure media environments. Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1327–1352. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1566394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardalov, M., Koychev, I., & Nakov, P. (2016, September 7–10). In search of credible news. Paper presented at the international conference on artificial intelligence: Methodology, systems, and applications, Varna, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A., & Mattson, M. E. (2011). Reading is believing: The truth effect and source credibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1705–1721. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindman, M., & Barash, V. (2018). Disinformation,‘fake news’ and influence campaigns on Twitter. Retrieved from https://www.issuelab.org/resources/33163/33163.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. doi:10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684. doi:10.1017/S0022381612000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Landrum, A., Carpenter, K., Helft, L., & Hall Jamieson, K. (2017). Science curiosity and political information processing. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 179–199. doi:10.1111/pops.12396
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86. doi:10.1017/bpp.2016.2
   Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B. (2018, September). Fake news. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/communication/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-809
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (Vol. 10). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., & Wueller, J. (2017). Fake news: A legal perspective. Journal of Internet Law, 20(10), 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (1979). Psychometrics and psychology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langin, K. (2018, March 8). Fake news spreads faster than true news on Twitter—thanks to people, not bots. Science magazine. Retrieved from https://www-science-org.access.library.miami.edu/content/article/fake-news-spreads-faster-true-news-twitter-thanks-people-not-bots
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F. … Rothschild, D. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. doi:10.1126/science.aao2998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker, M. (2016). Motivated reasoning, political information, and information literacy education. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(3), 511–528. doi:10.1353/pla.2016.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 65(3), 567–574. doi:10.1177/107769908806500301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.19
   Google Scholar
• Newhagen, J., & Nass, C. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 66(2), 277–284. doi:10.1177/107769908906600202
   Google Scholar
• Olan, F., Jayawickrama, U., Arakpogun, E. O., Suklan, J., & Liu, S. (2022). Fake news on social media: The impact on society. Information Systems Frontiers. doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10242-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdalga, D. (2018). Fake News and Social Endorsement Cues: Do the Number of Likes, Shares and Comments Influence Engagement with Inaccurate News Articles? [ Bachelor of Science honors thesis]. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, Y. (2018). Fake news propagation and detection: A sequential model. Management Science, 66(5), 1826–1846. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Who falls for fake news? The roles of analytic thinking, motivated reasoning, political ideology, and bullshit receptivity. SSRN Electronic Journal, 88(2), 1–63. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3023545
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019a). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2521–2526. doi:10.1073/pnas.1806781116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019b). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188(7), 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pundir, V., Devi, E. B., & Nath, V. (2021). Arresting fake news sharing on social media: A theory of planned behavior approach. Management Research Review, 44(8), 1108–1138. doi:10.1108/MRR-05-2020-0286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, J. (2020). Does social disagreement attenuate partisan motivated reasoning? A test case concerning economic evaluations. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1245–1261. doi:10.1017/S0007123418000315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, Y. M., de Moura, G. A., Desidério, G. A., de Oliveira, C. H., Lourenço, F. D., & de Figueiredo Nicolete, L. D. (2021). The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Journal of Public Health, 29(5), 1–10. doi:10.1007/s10389-021-01658-z
   Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., & Van Der Linden, S. (2019a). The fake news game: Actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research, 22(5), 570–580. doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., & Van der Linden, S. (2019b). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–10. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, V. L., Conroy, N., Chen, Y., & Cornwell, S. (2016). Fake news or truth? using satirical cues to detect potentially misleading news. Paper presented at the proceedings of the second workshop on computational approaches to deception detection, San Diego, California, U.S.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2018). The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior, 83(6), 278–287. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. The Association for Computing Machinery’s Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Explorations Newsletter, 19(1), 22–36. doi:10.1145/3137597.3137600
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, C. (2016). This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. Buzzfeed News. Retrieved from https://newsmediauk.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Buzzfeed-_This_Analysis_Shows_How_Viral_Fake_Election_News_Stories_Outperformed_Real_News_On_Facebook_-_BuzzFeed_News.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, C., Strapagiel, L., Shaban, H., Hall, E., & Singer-Vine, J. (2016). Hyperpartisan Facebook pages are publishing false and misleading information at an alarming rate. Buzzfeed News. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/partisan-fb-pages-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. (2017). Infographic: Beyond fake news–10 types of misleading news–thirteen languages. Retrieved from https://eavi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/beyond-fake-news_COLOUR_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (1999). Exploring receivers’ criteria for perception of print and online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(2), 373–386. doi:10.1177/107769909907600213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Singh, D., Virk, G. S., & Salo, J. (2020). Sharing of fake news on social media: Application of the honeycomb framework and the third-person effect hypothesis. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 57, 102197. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C., Jr, Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” a typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teel, C., & Verran, J. A. (1991). Focus on psychometrics. Factor comparison across studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 14(1), 67–72. doi:10.1002/nur.4770140110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, M. (2022). The fake news effect: Experimentally Identifying motivated reasoning using trust in news. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Library.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, N. E. (1998). The effect of common variance and structure pattern on random data eigenvalues: Implications for the accuracy of parallel analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(4), 541–568. doi:10.1177/0013164498058004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2018). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028–2049. doi:10.1177/1461444817712086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vegetti, F., & Mancosu, M. (2020). The impact of political sophistication and motivated reasoning on misinformation. Political Communication, 37(5), 678–695. doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1744778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. doi:10.1126/science.aap9559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. France. Retrieved from http://tverezo.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/PREMS-162317-GBR-2018-Report-desinformation-A4-BAT.pdf
   Google Scholar