Influence of using a pen-and-paper or computer-based approach on engineering students’ self-efficacy during idea generation

References

• Adánez, A. M. 2005. “Does Quantity Generate Quality? Testing the Fundamental Principle of Brainstorming.” The Spanish Journal of Psychology 8 (2): 215–220. doi:10.1017/S1138741600005096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. 1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (2): 357. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R. 2012. “Academic Self-efficacy: From Educational Theory to Instructional Practice.” Perspectives on Medical Education 1 (2): 76–85. doi:10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baer, J. 2015. “The Importance of Domain-specific Expertise in Creativity.” Roeper Review 37 (3): 165–178. doi:10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2006. “Guide for Constructing Self-efficacy Scales.” In Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, edited by F. Pajares, and T. Urdan, 307–337. Greenwhich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Becattini, N., and G. Cascini. 2016. “Improving Self-efficacy in Solving Inventive Problems with TRIZ.” In Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking, edited by G. E. Corazza and S. Agnoli, 195–213. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I. 2017. “Engineering Creativity – How To Measure It?” In N. Huda, D. Inglis, N. Tse, and G. Town (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (pp. 321–328). Manly, Australia: School of Engineering, Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I., A. Belski, V. Berdonosov, B. Busov, M. Bartlova, E. Malashevskaya, and N. Tervonen 2015. “Can Simple Ideation Techniques Influence Idea Generation: Comparing Results from Australia, Czech Republic, Finland and Russian Federation.” In A. Oo, A. Patel, T. Hilditch, and S. Chandran (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (pp. 474–483). Geelong, Australia: School of Engineering, Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I., and I. Belski 2008. “Cognitive Foundations of TRIZ Problem-solving Tools.” Paper presented at the TRIZ-Future Conference, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I., J. Baglin, and J. Harlim. 2013. “Teaching TRIZ at University: A Longitudinal Study.” International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (2): 346–354. Retrieved 22 May 2020. http://www.ijee.ie/latestissues/Vol29-2/08_ijee2691ns.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belski, I. 2007. Improve Your Thinking: Substance-Field Analysis. Melbourne: TRIZ4U.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I. 2019. “TRIZ Thinking Heuristics to Nurture Future Generations of Creative Engineers.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 24 (2): 86–97. (early online access). doi:10.1080/22054952.2019.1699493.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-S., Y.-H. Chien, K.-C. Yu, Y.-H. Chu, and M. Y.-C. Chen. 2016. “Effect of TRIZ on the Creativity of Engineering Students.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 19: 112–122. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, Y. P., and Z. M. Don. 2013. “Effects of Computer-based Educational Achievement Test on Test Performance and Test Takers’ Motivation.” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (5): 1889–1895. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, Y. P. 2012. “Effects of Computer-based Testing on Test Performance and Testing Motivation.” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (5): 1580–1586. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clariana, R., and P. Wallace. 2002. “Paper–based versus Computer–based Assessment: Key Factors Associated with the Test Mode Effect.” British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (5): 593–602. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. 2000. “Defining and Measuring Creativity: Are Creativity Tests Worth Using?” Roeper Review 23 (2): 72–79. doi:10.1080/02783190009554069.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. 2015. Creativity in Engineering: Novel Solutions to Complex Problems. San Diego, CA: United States: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, S. R., E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert. 2014. “Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (3): 417–449. doi:10.1002/jee.20048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engineers Australia. 2017. “Stage 1 Competency Standard for Professional Engineer.“ Retrieved22 May 2020. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2017-03/Stage%201%20Competency%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, A., D. Monticolo, M. Camargo, and M. Bourgault. 2016. “Creativity Support Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 21: 109–122. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadd, K. 2011. TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, A., T. Goldfinch, and K. Willey 2017. “Characterising the Learning Dispositions of First Year Engineering Students.” In N. Huda, D. Inglis, N. Tse, and G. Town (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education. Manly, Australia: School of Engineering, Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Harlim, J., and I. Belski. 2013. “Long-term Innovative Problem Solving Skills: Redefining Problem Solving.” International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (2): 280–290. Retrieved 20 May 2020. https://www.ijee.ie/latestissues/Vol29-2/03_ijee2686ns.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlim, J., and I. Belski. 2015. “Learning TRIZ: Impact on Confidence When Facing Problems.” Procedia Engineering 131: 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.352.
   Google Scholar
• Ilevbare, I. M., D. Probert, and R. Phaal. 2013. “A Review of TRIZ, and Its Benefits and Challenges in Practice.” Technovation 33 (2–3): 30–37. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershaw, T., K. Holtta-Otto, and Y. S. Lee 2011. “The Effect of Prototyping and Critical Feedback on Fixation in Engineering Design.” Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, Massachusetts: USA.
   Google Scholar
• Leeson, H. V. 2006. “The Mode Effect: A Literature Review of Human and Technological Issues in Computerized Testing.” International Journal of Testing 6 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0601_1.
   Google Scholar
• Male, S. A., M. B. Bush, and E. S. Chapman 2009. “Identification of Competencies Required by Engineers Graduating in Australia.” Paper presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Marakas, G. M., and J. J. Elam. 1997. “Creativity Enhancement in Problem Solving: Through Software or Process?” Management Science 43 (8): 1136–1146. doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.8.1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, M., and T. Schrier. 2015. “Digital or Printed Textbooks: Which Do Students Prefer and Why?” Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism 15 (2): 166–185. doi:10.1080/15313220.2015.1026474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehrle, M. G. 2005. “How Combinations of TRIZ Tools are Used in Companies–results of a Cluster Analysis.” R&D Management 35 (3): 285–296. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00390.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, C. S., A. Patil, and P. Mertova. 2009. “Re-engineering Graduate Skills–a Case Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (2): 131–139. doi:10.1080/03043790902829281.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, A., and M. Ranieri. 2019. “Comparing Paper‐based and Electronic Multiple‐choice Examinations with Personal Devices: Impact on Students’ Performance, Self‐efficacy and Satisfaction.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (3): 1495–1506. doi:10.1111/bjet.12644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikou, S. A., and A. A. Economides. 2016. “The Impact of Paper-based, Computer-based and Mobile-based Self-assessment on Students’ Science Motivation and Achievement.” Computers in Human Behavior 55: 1241–1248. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., and K. Garland. 2008. “Computer-vs. Paper-based Tasks: Are They Equivalent?” Ergonomics 51 (9): 1352–1375. doi:10.1080/00140130802170387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puente-Díaz, R. 2016. “Creative Self-efficacy: An Exploration of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Applied Implications.” The Journal of Psychology 150 (2): 175–195. doi:10.1080/00223980.2015.1051498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, P., and K. Jablokow 2010. “Psychological Inertia and the Role of Idea Generation Techniques in the Early Stages of Engineering Design.” Paper presented at the Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference Villanova, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, M., J. Bendick, E. Holm, and W. Hertel. 2011. “Economic Impact of Biofouling on a Naval Surface Ship.” Biofouling 27 (1): 87–98. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.542809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, T., I. Belski, J. Harlim, J. Baglin, R. Ferguson, and T. Molyneaux 2011. “Do We Succeed in Developing Problem-solving skills-The Engineering Students’ Perspective.” Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education Fremantle, Western Australia. Retrieved 20 May 2020. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=257273676366977;res=IELENG
   Google Scholar
• Treffinger, D. J., S. G. Isaksen, and K. B. Stead-Dorval. 2006. Creative Problem Solving: An Introduction. 4th ed. Ed, L. Elwood. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, A., and I. Belski 2019. “Exploring Differences in Perceived Problem-solving and Creativity Skills between Novice and Experienced Engineering Students.” In 30th Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2019): Educators Becoming Agents of Change: Innovate, Integrate, Motivate, Brisbane, Australia. Engineers Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, A., I. Belski, and M. Hamilton 2016. “Engaging Engineering Students in Creative Problem Solving Tasks: How Does It Influence Future Performance.” In 44th SEFI Conference, Tampere, Finland (pp. 12–15).
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, A., I. Belski, and M. Hamilton. 2017. “Developing Creativity and Problem Solving Skills of Engineering Students: A Comparison of Web and Pen and Paper Based Approaches.” European Journal of Engineering Education 42 (6): 1309–1329. doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1291584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, A., I. Belski, M. Hamilton, and S. Adams. 2019. “Creativity in Electrical Engineering Degree Programs: Where Is the Content?” IEEE Transactions on Education 62 (4): 288–296. doi:10.1109/TE.2019.2912834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., and J. V. Nickerson. 2017. “A Literature Review on Individual Creativity Support Systems.” Computers in Human Behavior 74: 139–151. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn, S., J. Herman, and R. Stewart. 2017. “Evaluation of Performance and Perceptions of Electronic Vs. Paper Multiple-choice Exams.” Advances in Physiology Education 41 (4): 548–555. doi:10.1152/advan.00138.2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappe, S. E., and J. Tise 2019. “Work in Progress: Engineering Students’ Changing Conceptions of the Value of Creativity.” Paper presented at the 8th Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES 2019), Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar